Advanced Search Results
Madhu Parumala Vs. Speaker, Kerala Legislative Assembly
Kerala
Jul-21-2006
Constitution
Constitution of India - Articles 25, 26, 173, 188, 193, 210, 226 and 348
AIR2007Ker18; 2006(3)KLT558
Murali Purushothaman,; Roy Chacho, Sr. Government Pleader,;
K.S. Radhakrishnan, J.1. The question that is posed for consideration in this case is whether the oath taken in the name of Allah by respondents 6 to 16 occupying seats in the Kerala State Legislative Assembly...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSuresh Vs. State of Kerala
Kerala
Feb-11-2005
ConstitutionElection
Kerala Panchayat Raj Act, 1994 - Sections 153(3) and 153(4); Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16(4), 243D, 243D(2) and 243D(4); Constitution of India (73rd Amendment) Act, 1992
2005(1)KLT848
Murali Purushothaman, Adv.,; M.K. Aboobacker, Government Pleader and;
K.S. Radhakrishnan, J.1. Whether reservation of the office of the President of a Grama Panchayat exclusi vely to woman belonging to Scheduled Caste/Scheduled Tribe community under the second proviso to Section 153(4)(d) of the Kerala Panchayat...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBalasubramanian Vs. Chandradas
Kerala
Mar-22-2006
Civil
Municipality Act, 1994 - Sections 4, 5, 6, 9, 10(2), 10(4), 11(3), 12, 12(1), 12(5), 14, 29, 43(2), 64(1A), 143(1), 143(1A) and 143(2); Constitution (Seventy Fourth) Amendment Act 1992; Constitution of India - Articles 226, 243T and 334; Kerala Municipality (Election of Chairperson and Deputy Chairperson) Rules 1998; Kerala Municipality (Election of Chairperson and Deputy Chairperson) Rules 1995 - Rule 6(3)
2006(2)KLT467
Murali Purushothaman,; T.A. Shaji,; V.V. Nandagopal Namb
K.S. Radhakrishnan, J.1. The cardinal question that has come up for consideration before us is whether we should issue a writ of quo warranto against a duly elected Deputy Chairperson of a Municipality on the sole...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Balasubramanyan Vs. State of Kerala
Kerala
Nov-15-2005
CivilElection
Kerala Municipality Act, 1994 - Sections 4(1), 4(2), 5, 7, 10, 11, 11(3), 12, 12(1), 12(5), 12(8A), 14, 15, 15(8), 18, 18(2), 18(3), 19(11), 20, 20(1), 22(1), 23, 29, 36, 36(2), 51, 143, 143(1), 143(2), 143(18), 143A, 143(1A) and 143(1B); Representation of the People Act - Sections 81, 81(3) and 117; Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 4(1), 5A and 17(1); Madhya Pradesh Municipality Act, ;Punjab Municipal Act, 1911 - Sections 47, 47(1), 47(2) and 47(3); Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 17(1) and 33(2); Constitution of India - Articles 62, 62(1), 143, 173, 180(2), 188, 193, 194, 198, 199(4), 200, 212, 219, 226, 243ZG and 320(3)
2005(4)KLT882
Murali Purushothaman,; P. Gopinath,; V. Chitambaresh
K.M. Joseph, J.1. The principal question which arises in both these writ petitions is whether the oath taken by the third respondent in W.P.(C) No. 28913/05 who is none other than the first petitioner in W.P.(C)...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMadhu Vs. State Election Commission
Kerala
Dec-11-2003
Election
Kerala Municipalities Act, 1994 - Sections 91 and 92
2004(1)KLT49
Murali Purushothaman,; Subash Chand and; M.A. Thomaskutt
K. Balakrishnan Nair, J.W.P.(C) No. 35632/031. The petitioners in this Writ Petition are the Councillors of the 3rd respondent Municipality. Feeling aggrieved by the steps taken by the 1st respondent State Election Commission to disqualify them,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNaseera Beevi Vs. State Election Commission
Kerala
Mar-09-2004
ElectionCivil
Kerala Local Authorities (Prohibition of Defection) Act, 1999
2004(1)KLT1108
Murali Purushothaman and; T.R. Ramachandran Nair, Advs.
K. Balakrishnan Nair, J.1. The petitioners are the members of Navaikulam Grama Panchayat in Thiruvananthapuram istrict. They are challenging Ext.P11 order of the Election Commission. By the said order, the Commission has held that they have...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRajaji Mathew Thomas Vs. the Election Commission of India
Kerala
Mar-21-2011
Constitution
Constitution of India - Articles 324, 327, 328, 226, 32, 324(1)
ILR2011(1)Ker30
SRI.MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN, Adv.
1. The writ petition is filed with the prayers as follows: "i) Issue a writ in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents 1 and 2 not to interfere with the implementation of the subsidized rice...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPathumma Vs. State Election Commission
Kerala
May-25-2004
ElectionCivil
Kerala Local Authorities (Prohibition of Defection) Act, 1999 - Sections 2 and 3
2004(2)KLT568
Murali Purushothaman and; T.R. Ramachandran Nair, Advs.
M. Ramachandran, J. 1. The Kerala Local Authorities (Prohibition of Defection) Act, 1999 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) authorises, under Section 4 of the Act, the State Election Commission to decide any question as to...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJoseph Master Vs. Secretary, B.P.O.
Kerala
Jun-21-2006
Constitution
Kerala Panchayat Raj Act, 1986 - Sections 157, 157(1), 157(2), 157(3), 157(6), 157(8), 157(9), 157(13) and 157(14)
2006(3)KLT512
Murali Purushothaman and; N. Nandakumara Menon, Advs.
Thottathil B. Radhakrishnan, J.1. Sri. Murali Purushothaman appears for the first respondent and Sri. N. Nandakumara Menon appears for the second respondent. Heard counsel for parties.2. Petitioner took charge as the Vice President of the second...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMohammedkutty Vs. Sadanandan
Kerala
Jan-08-2010
Election
Kerala Panchayat Raj Act, 1994 - Sections 30, 30(2), 35, 35(1), 36, 36(2), 84, 84(2), 98, 100, 101, 102, 107(1), 107(2), 149, 149(3), 150 and 159; ;Representation of the People Act - Sections 147, 149, 150, 151 and 151A
2010(1)KLT1018
Murali Purushothaman and; A. Ranjith Narayanan, Advs.
P.R. Raman, J.1. The appellant contested the bye-election to the Koduvally Grama Panchayat from Ward No. II on 23.1.2007. The first respondent was also a contesting candidate from the same Ward. The result of the election...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »