Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: murali · Page 1 of about 8,005 results (0.304 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Nov 28 2002

Valluri Siva Kumar Rajah Vs. Koppuravuri Bhagavathi Devi and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Nov-28-2002

Subject : Contempt of Court

Acts : Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 - Sections 2

Reported in : 2003(2)ALD101

Advocate for Respondent : Ramakrishna, Adv. for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2, ;Bhaskara Lakshmi, SC for High Court of A.P. for Respondent No. 3 and ;Rama Rao, Government Pleader for Home for Respondent Nos. 4 and 5

P.S. Narayana, J.1. Heard Sri Srinivasa Murthy, the learned Counsel representing the petitioner, Sri Rama Krishna, the learned Counsel representing Respondents 1 and Respondent 2, Smt. Bhaskara Lakshmi, the learned Counsel representing Respondent 3 and the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 12 2003

Sutari Venkata Rama Brahmachari and ors. Vs. Jaggavarapu Ramakrishnamm ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-12-2003

Subject : Contract

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 100

Reported in : 2003(4)ALT418

Advocate for Respondent : S. Lakshma Reddy, Adv.

P.S. Narayana, J.1. Sri V. Parabrahma Sastri, the learned counsel representing the appellants had raised the following substantial question of law in the present second appeal: 'Whether the appellate Court had not erred in not considering...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 29 2004

Sarojben Wd/O Mangalbhai Somabhai Vaghri Vs. Ramji Mandir Trust

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Jul-29-2004

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947 - Sections 5(8) and 23A; Constitution of India - Article 226; Indian Electricity Act, 1910

Reported in : AIR2005Guj5; (2005)3GLR2041

Advocate for Respondent : Yatin Soni, Adv. for Respondent No. 1/1 in Letters Patent Appeal Nos. 1080 of 2002 and 1159 to 1162 of 2004

M.S. Shah, J.1. These appeals are directed against common judgment and order dated 4th October, 2001 of the learned Single Judge allowing Special Civil Application Nos. 4280 to 4294 of 2001, by which, the learned Single...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Dec 15 2011

Shantha and ors. Vs. V.Murali and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Dec-15-2011

Subject : Trusts

Acts : Madras Hindu Religious Endowments Act 1926 - Sections 84, 9(5) ; Indian Trust Act, 1982 - Section 34

One Shantha, wife of late Venkatarama Naidu; one Sasikala, wife of Thiru Venkatesan and daughter of late Venkatarama Naidu; and one Rajalakshmi, wife of Thiru Srinivasan and daughter of late Venkatarama Naidu have filed CRP No.3067...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 11 2004

Bhatt Indravadan Nathalal Vs. State of Gujarat

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Feb-11-2004

Subject : Property

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 4, 5A, 6, 9, 50 and 52; Gujarat Municipalities Act - Sections 2(22), 65(2), 69, 80, 80(2), 146, 147, 148 and 258; Bombay District Municipal Act; Bombay Municipal Boroughs Act, 1925 - Sections 52; Legislatures vide Constitution (74th Amendment) Act, 1992; General Act; Constitution of India - Articles 243P to 243ZG and 254; Land Acquisition Act, 1864

Reported in : (2004)2GLR1365

Advocate for Respondent : Harsha Devani, AGP for Respondent Nos. 1-2 and; Murali N. Devnani, Adv. for Respondent No. 4

K.A. Puj, J.1. Since common issue is involved in all these matters, the same are being disposed of by this common judgment.2. In Special Civil Application No. 4716 of 2002, there are in all 11 petitioners...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 21 2006

Madhu Parumala Vs. Speaker, Kerala Legislative Assembly

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Jul-21-2006

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 25, 26, 173, 188, 193, 210, 226 and 348

Reported in : AIR2007Ker18; 2006(3)KLT558

Advocate for Respondent : Murali Purushothaman,; Roy Chacho, Sr. Government Pleader,;

K.S. Radhakrishnan, J.1. The question that is posed for consideration in this case is whether the oath taken in the name of Allah by respondents 6 to 16 occupying seats in the Kerala State Legislative Assembly...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 11 2005

Suresh Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Feb-11-2005

Subject : ConstitutionElection

Acts : Kerala Panchayat Raj Act, 1994 - Sections 153(3) and 153(4); Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16(4), 243D, 243D(2) and 243D(4); Constitution of India (73rd Amendment) Act, 1992

Reported in : 2005(1)KLT848

Advocate for Respondent : Murali Purushothaman, Adv.,; M.K. Aboobacker, Government Pleader and;

K.S. Radhakrishnan, J.1. Whether reservation of the office of the President of a Grama Panchayat exclusi vely to woman belonging to Scheduled Caste/Scheduled Tribe community under the second proviso to Section 153(4)(d) of the Kerala Panchayat...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 22 2006

Balasubramanian Vs. Chandradas

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Mar-22-2006

Subject : Civil

Acts : Municipality Act, 1994 - Sections 4, 5, 6, 9, 10(2), 10(4), 11(3), 12, 12(1), 12(5), 14, 29, 43(2), 64(1A), 143(1), 143(1A) and 143(2); Constitution (Seventy Fourth) Amendment Act 1992; Constitution of India - Articles 226, 243T and 334; Kerala Municipality (Election of Chairperson and Deputy Chairperson) Rules 1998; Kerala Municipality (Election of Chairperson and Deputy Chairperson) Rules 1995 - Rule 6(3)

Reported in : 2006(2)KLT467

Advocate for Respondent : Murali Purushothaman,; T.A. Shaji,; V.V. Nandagopal Namb

K.S. Radhakrishnan, J.1. The cardinal question that has come up for consideration before us is whether we should issue a writ of quo warranto against a duly elected Deputy Chairperson of a Municipality on the sole...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 26 2008

The Kerala Christian Professional College Management Federation Vs. th ...

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Sep-26-2008

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Right to Information Act (RTI); MCI Rules

Reported in : AIR2009Ker105

Advocate for Respondent : S. Krishnamoorthy and; Murali Purusho-thaman, Advs.

ORDERV. Giri, J.1. Common issues arise for consideration in all these writ petitions. Therefore, they have been heard together and are being disposed of by this common judgment.2. Since the pleadings are more comprehensive in Writ...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 27 2009

Devaraj Dhanram Vs. Firebricks and Potteries P. Ltd. and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jul-27-2009

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 10F, 397, 398 and 399

Reported in : [2009]151CompCas37(Kar); [2010]97SCL281(Kar)

Advocate for Respondent : A. Murali, Adv. for respondent Nos. 1 and 6 to 9

D.V. Shylendra Kumar, J.1. This is an appeal under Section 10F of the Companies Act, 1956 (for short, 'the Act') filed by a shareholder of the first respondent-company, who had petitioned the Company Law Board, Additional...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial