Advanced Search Results

S.C. Dubey Vs. Union of India

Court : Delhi

Subject : Labour and IndustrialConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 86(2000)DLT523

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Mukul Rohtagi, Senior Advocate and ; Mr.V. Shekhar, Adv.

ORDERK. Ramamoorthy, J. 1. The second respondent is a public sector undertaking engaged in the manufacture of electronic instruments and manufacture of colour TVs and engaged in other activities with reference to electronics. The Headquarters of...

Kartongen Kemi Och Forvaltning Ab and ors. Vs. State Through Cbi

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 227 and 228; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 120B, 161, 420 and 465; Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 - Sections 5(1) and 5(2); Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 63 and 78(6)

Reported in : 2004(72)DRJ693

Advocate for Respondent : Mukul Rohtagi, Addl. Solicitor General, ; Navin Chawla, ; N

J.D. Kapoor, J.1. The petitioners, M/s A.B. Bofors, S.P. Hinduja, G.P. Hinduja and P.P. Hinduja, have through these petitions challenged the impugned order dated 14.11.2002 passed by the learned Special Judge whereby he has charged them...

Tata Industries Ltd. and anr. Vs. Grasim Industries Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 11, 11(6) and 11(12); Companies Act, 1956; LCIA Arbitration Rules

Reported in : AIR2008SC2970; 2008(3)ARBLR1(SC); 2008BusLR683(SC); (2008)4CompLJ220(SC); JT2008(7)SC575; (2008)7MLJ734(SC); 2008(9)SCALE717; (2008)10SCC187; 2008(2)LC825(SC); 2008AIRSCW5015; 2008(4)CivilLJ91

Advocate for Respondent : K.K. Venugopal and ; Shyam Diwan, Sr. Advs., ; Abhishek Manu Si

V.S. Sirpurkar, J.1. Two companies, first being M/s. Tata Industries Ltd., and the second being M/s. Apex Investments (Mauritius) Holding Private Limited (hereinafter referred to Applicant Nos. 1 and 2 respectively) have approached this Court under...

Bharat Coking Coal Ltd. Vs. Karam Chand Thapar and Bros. Pvt. Ltd. and ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Civil

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 136 and 226; Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971; Coking Coal Mines (Natiolisation) Act, 1972 - Sections 2, 3, 6, 7, 7(1), 7(2) and 8; Mines Act, 1952

Reported in : JT2002(9)SC267; (2003)1SCC6

Advocate for Respondent : A.M. Singhvi, Sr. Adv. and ; Jayant Bhushan, Adv.

Banerjee, J.1. Leave granted.2. It is for the purposes of protecting, conserving and promoting scientific development of the resources of coking coal being a need to meet the growing requirements of iron and steel industry and...

Delhi Financial Corporation Vs. V.P. Puri and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 12, Rule 6

Reported in : 2007(1)AWC618(SC); 2006(13)SCALE277

Advocate for Respondent : P.V. Kapur, Sr. Adv., ; Anjali K. Varma, ; Niraj Gupta and

D.K. Jain, J.1. Challenge in this petition is to the order, dated 31.8.2006, passed by a Division Bench of the Delhi High Court, affirming the order passed by a learned Single Judge, whereby the application filed...

Novartis Ag Vs. Wander Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 148 - Order 21, Rule 90 - Order 23, Rule 3; Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 28

Reported in : AIR2005Delhi154; 114(2004)DLT625; 2004(77)DRJ520

Advocate for Respondent : A.S. Chandhiok, Sr. Adv., ; Sudhanshu Batra, ; Ruchi A. Mah

Mukul Mudgal, J.1. By this application the defendant is seeking extension of time to perform certain obligations in respect of settlement between the parties dated 20th August, 2002 approved by this Court. It is not in...

Modi Rubber Ltd. Vs. Guardian International Corp.

Court : Delhi

Subject : SICA

Acts : Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 - Sections 16 and 18; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 82; Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 6, 6.1, 9, 11, 17, 18, 19 to 24, 25 and 36; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 27, 32, 39 and 56; Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 10, 14, 14(1), 16, 21, 23, 41, 41(1) and 42; Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 18, 20 and 41; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 148A - Order 38, Rule 5 - Order 39; LCIA Rules; Constitution of India - Articles 16 and 226

Reported in : 2007(2)ARBLR133(Delhi); 141(2007)DLT822

Advocate for Respondent : A.S. Chandhiok and ; Rajiv Nayar, Sr. Advs., ; Mann, ;

Gita Mittal, J.1. This petition raises two very interesting questions which are required to be answered. The first question raised is whether a party can seek interim relief on the ground that the other side has...

State of Uttaranchal. Vs. M/S Golden Forest Co. (P) Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Property Civil

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Reorganisation Act, 2000 - Section 91 ; Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950 - Sections 154(1), 166, 167, 167(2) ;

1. Leave granted.2. The only question which arises for consideration in these appeals is whether the Board of Revenue, U.P. could hear and decide the revisions filed by the appellant after creation of the State of...

Shagun Mahila Udyogik Sahakari Sanstha Maryadit Vs. State of Maharasht ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Maharashtra Co operative Societies Act, 1960.; Constitution of India - Article 32; Public Trust Act, 1950,; Societies Registration Act, 1860,; Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, ; Company registered under the Companies Act, 1956. ; Prevention of Food Adulteration Act ; Food Adulteration Prohibition Act, 1954.

1. Leave granted. 2. The instant appeal is directed against the final judgment and order of the High Court of judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench at Nagpur dated 9th September, 2010, in Writ Petition No. 4210...

Permanent Building Management and Fund Committee Vs. Naraina Industrie ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Property

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2

Reported in : 1999VIAD(Delhi)466; 82(1999)DLT353

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Mukul Rohatgi Sr. Advocate and ; Mr. Man Mohan, Adv.

ORDERVikramjit Sen, J.1. This application under Order XXXIX, Rules 1 and 2 was filed along with the plaint praying inter alias that the Defendants be restrained from letting out any portion of building of the Association...