Advanced Search Results

Arun Kaushal Advocate and anr. Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India, 1950 - Articles 226

Reported in : 1999IIIAD(Delhi)107

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Rakesh Tikku, ; Mr. Mukul Gupta and ; Ms. Rekha Palli

ORDERDevinder Gupta, A.C.J.1. The All India Institute of Medical Sciences (hereinafter referred to as the 'AIIMS') is a premier medical institution of the country and a center of excellence for learning. It was established by the...

Dr. Anurag JaIn and ors. Vs. the Director, All India Institute of Medi ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Constitution

Reported in : 2002VIAD(Delhi)204; AIR2002Delhi378; 98(2002)DLT406; 2002(62)DRJ816

Advocate for Respondent : Mukul Gupta and ; Maninder Singh, Advs.

Manmohan Sarin, J. 1. The petitioners, four in number, have filed this writ petition seeking a writ of mandamus to the respondents to conduct the counselling and filling up of the seats of MDS Course in...

Krishan Kumar Singh (Dr.) Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 1999IIIAD(Delhi)385; 79(1999)DLT332; 1999(49)DRJ701

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Sanjeev Sachdeva, ; Mr. Jamil Khan, ; Mr. Mukul Gupta

ORDERK. Ramamoorthy, J.1. The petitioner, who was Professor & Head of the Department, Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, AIIMS, New Delhi, attained the age of superannuation on the 30th of September, 1998. Before that date some time...

Dr. Sandeep Agarwala and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16 and 142; Institute Act - Sections 10 and 10(5); AIIMS Act, 1956; Recruitment Rules - Rules 13, 15 and 18; Kerala Subordinate Services Rules - Rule 9E

Reported in : 2002IVAD(Delhi)909; 2002(64)DRJ389

Advocate for Respondent : Maninder Singh, ; Ankur Talwar and ; Mukul Gupta, Advs.

Khan, (J) 1. Petitioners are the products of a stale-mate created mainly in the wake of interim order passed by this court dated 15.11.94 in connected CWP No. 4223/94 filed by Faculty Association of All India...

Smt. Pushpa Arya Vs. the Director, A.i.i.M.S. and Others

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : All India Institute of Medical Sciences Regulation, 1958 - Regulation 26; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 16

Reported in : 94(2001)DLT60

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Mukul Gupta, Adv.

ORDERDr. Mukundakam sharam, J.1. The question that falls for consideration in the present writ petition is for determination of the actual seniority position of the petitioner, who is working as a Nursing Sister in All India...

Dr. Hari Prakash Vs. All India Institute of Medical Sciences

Court : Delhi

Subject : Election

Acts : Dentists Act, 1948 - Sections 3 and 5; Bihar Co-operative Societies Act, 1935

Reported in : 2001IVAD(Delhi)429; AIR2001Delhi296; 91(2001)DLT199; 2001(58)DRJ746

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Manider Singh, Adv. for Dental Council of India and ; Mr. Mukul Gupta for AIIMS, Adv.

ORDERManmohan Sarin, J. 1. The petitioner Dr. Hari Prakash, head of the Dental Faculty of the respondent All India Institute of Medical Sciences (hereinafter referred to as AIIMS). has filed this writ petition. He seeks quashing...

Centre for Public Interest Litigation Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : All India Institute of Medical Sciences Act, 1956 - Sections 2, 3, 4, 6, 6(1), 6(2), 7, 7(1), 10(3), 11, 11(1), 11(5), 15, 17, 18, 25, 26, 28, 29 and 29(1); ;All-India Institute of Medical Sciences (Amendment) Act, 2000 - Sections 6(1); ;Agricultural Marketing Act, 1958; CCS Conduct Rules - Rule 2(10), 7, 7(1), 7(3), 4, 9, 12A, 14 and 56; Central Government Rules; ;All India Institute of Medical Sciences Regulations, 1999 - Regulation 4, 4(3), 4(4), 4(5), 5, 9, 24, 30, 30(2), 30(3), 31 and 32; ;Constitution of India - Articles 102, 103(2) and 226

Reported in : 139(2007)DLT289

Advocate for Respondent : Gopal Subramaniam, ASG, ; R. Venkataramani, ; Mukul Gupta

Swatanter Kumar, J.1. Centre for Public Interest Litigation (CPIL), a registered Society stated to have been formed for the purposes of conducting public interest litigation in an organized manner approached this Court under Article 226 of...

S.K. Srivastava Vs. All India Institute of Medical Sciences and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Contract

Acts : Telegraph Act, 1885 - Sections 4

Reported in : AIR2001Delhi282; 2000(57)DRJ774

Advocate for Respondent : Piyush Sharma, Adv. for Respondent 3, ; Mukul Gupta, Adv. for Respondents 1 and 2 and ;

ORDERManmohan Sarin, J. 1. Rule.With the consent of the parties, writ petition is taken up for disposal.The petitioner, an unemployed graduate who was allotted MTNL STD/ISD booth in the premises of respondent No. 1 & 2...

Anita Malik Vs. A.i.i.M.S. and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Fundamental and Supplementary Rules - Rules 50, 50(5) and 53(4)

Reported in : 129(2006)DLT136

Advocate for Respondent : Mukul Gupta and ; Ankur Jain, Advs.

S. Ravindra Bhat, J.1. Issue Rule. Mr. Mukul Gupta, learned counsel waives notice of Rule. With consent of counsel for parties, the matter was heard for disposal.2. The petitioner in these proceedings was appointed as Sister...

Dr. Kuldeep Verma and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 120B, 420, 474 and 511

Reported in : 99(2002)DLT25

Advocate for Respondent : Harish Salve, Solicitor General and ; Navin Chawla, Adv. for respondent No. 1, ;

Manmohan Sarin, J.1. Petitioners numbering 23, who are Doctors, holding MBBS Degrees and are the applicants for admission to MD/MS and MDS courses, had taken All India Post Graduate Medical Entrance Examination-2002, for short (AIPGMEE-2002), conducted...