Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: ms satpute · Page 1 of about 8 results (0.037 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Apr 28 2014

Ashok Shikshan Sanstha and Others Vs. S.N. Dutonde and Others

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

Decided on : Apr-28-2014

Subject : Education

B.P. Dharmadhikari, J. 1. Dispute is about a public trust having registration number PTR no. F-47 by name Ashok Educational Society duly registered under the Bombay Public Trust Act, hereinafter referred to as BPT Act. Petitioners...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 06 2015

Gramin Shikshan Prasarak Mandal and Another Vs. Laxman Shyamrao Parate ...

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

Decided on : Apr-06-2015

Subject : Education

Oral Judgment: 1. Heard Shri A.D. Mohgaonkar, the learned advocate for the petitioners, Ms. Kirti Satpute, the learned advocate for the respondent no.1 and Shri D.B. Patel, the learned A.G.P. for the respondent no.2. 2. Rule....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 06 2008

Mahadeo Rama Vaidya and anr. Vs. State of Maharashtra and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : May-06-2008

Subject : CivilLimitation

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 4, 4(1), 6, 9, 12(2), 18, 23, 24, 51A and 54; Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation Act, 1961 - Sections 3(2), 32, 32(1), 32(2), 32(3), 33, 33(3), 33(5), 34, 34(1) and 34(2)

Reported in : 2008(5)ALLMR342; 2008(6)BomCR463; 2008(6)MhLj659

Advocate for Respondent : Anjan De and ;K. Satpute, Advs. in F.A. Nos. 349, 351/2008 for respondent No. 1 and in F.A. No. 350, 352, 476/2008 and in C.Appln. No. 8595/2007 in F.A. ST. No. 13723/2007 for respondent Nos. 1 and 2,

Dharmadhikari B.P., J.1. Parties had stated that all these Appeals under Section 54 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter referred to as 1894 Act) are connected and can be decided together finally at the stage of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Oct 17 2011

All Residents of Balaji Ward Vs. State of Maharashtra, and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Oct-17-2011

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Maharashtra Regional And Town Planning Act, 1966 - Section 126, 10, 45(1); Constitution of India - Articles 226 ; Land Acquisition Act - Section 11A, 4(1)

1] Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. 2] The petitioners are owners of Survey No. 34/3, area 0.41 ares situated at Mouza Chandrapur, Rayatwari, Patwari Halka No. 8, Bandobust No. 29, Tq. & District Chandrapur....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 04 2013

Lalit Vs. Vandana and Others

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

Decided on : Mar-04-2013

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Respondent : Ms. Satpute

Oral Judgment: Heard Dr. Jamal, learned counsel for the petitioner and Ms. Satpute, learned counsel for the respondents. 2. Rule. Rule returnable forthwith by consent of learned counsel for the parties. 3. The petitioner feels aggrieved...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 21 2011

Rosemary Dzuvichu and Another Vs. the State of Nagaland and Others

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Oct-21-2011

Subject : Land Acquisition

1. The instant writ petition is filed seeking a direction to the respondents to immediately hold elections for Municipal Councils and Town Councils throughout Nagaland with one-third of the seats reserved for women in accordance with...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 05 2013

Abc Vs. Commissioner of Police and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-05-2013

Subject : Education

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Salwan

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on: Judgment delivered on: % + 30.01.2013 05.02.2013 W.P.(C.) No. 12730/2005 and C.M. Nos. 9505/2005, 13315/2005 & 12222/2007 ABC Through: ..... Petitioner Ms. Jayshree...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 12 2011

Court Its Own Motion Vs. U.O.i.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-12-2011

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 21

Advocate for Respondent : Mr.A.S. Chandhiok, Adv.

1. The present public interest litigation was initiated suo motu by this Court taking into consideration a newspaper report dated 29th August, 2010 published in the Hindustan Times that a destitute woman breathed her last on...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial