Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: ms sandhya goswami and · Page 1 of about 15 results (0.038 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Oct 22 2013

State of Rajasthan Vs. Ucchab Lal Chhanwal

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-22-2013

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Respondent : Ms. Sandhya Goswami, Mr. Santosh Mishra

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.9544 OF2013(Arising out of S.L.P. (C) No.21202 of 2011) State of Rajasthan … Appellant Versus Ucchab Lal Chhanwal …Respondent WITH CIVIL APPEAL No.9545 OF2013(Arising out...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 01 2004

Chandi Prasad and ors. Vs. Jagdish Prasad and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-01-2004

Subject : PropertyLimitation

Acts : Limitation Act, 1963 - Schedule - Article 136; Limitation Act - Sections 15(1) - Schedule - Articles 182 and 183; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 2(2), 47, 48, 48(1), 96 and 100

Reported in : 2004(6)ALD75(SC); 2005(5)ALLMR(SC)339; 2005(1)ARC630; 2004(4)AWC3208(SC); 2004(3)BLJR1938; 2004(5)CTC67; [2005(1)JCR141(SC)]; JT2004(8)SC255; 2004(3)KLT654(SC); (2004)4MLJ1

Advocate for Respondent : Sandhya goswami, ; M.P. Shorawala and ; P.K. Chakravarty,

S.B. Sinha, J. INTRODUCTION :1. What would be the date from which a decree becomes enforceable for execution thereof within the meaning of Article 136 of the Limitation Act, 1963 (the Act) is the question involved...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 13 2014

Bastiram Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-13-2014

Subject : Criminal

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL No.758 OF2004Bastiram ....Appellant Versus State of Rajasthan ....Respondent WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL No.403 OF2014(Arising out of Special Leave Petition (Crl.) No.5240 of 2004) AND CRIMINAL...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Aug 18 1993

Gore Lal Shakya Vs. Maharaj Singh Yadav and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-18-1993

Subject : Election

Acts : Representation of the People Act, 1951 - Sections 116-A, 80-A, 81, 82, 86(1), 82(a), 81(3)

Reported in : 1995Supp(3)SCC407

S.R. Pandian and; Kuldip Singh, JJ.1. This appeal under Section 116-A of the Representation of the People Act, 1951 (for short ‘the Act’) is against the order dated 10-8-1990 passed by the High Court of Allahabad...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 16 1996

Maulvi Issa Qureshi Vs. District Judge, Deoria and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-16-1996

Subject : CivilProperty

Reported in : 1996VIIAD(SC)397; JT1996(8)SC175; 1996(6)SCALE487; (1996)5SCC731; [1996]Supp4SCR734

Advocate for Respondent : Sandhya Goswami, Adv.

ORDER1. Leave granted.2. We have heard learned Counsel on both sides.3. These two appeals by special leave arise against the orders of the high Court of Allahabad dated 15.11.1995 & 1.3.1995 made in Revision Petition No....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 04 2000

Rajendra Vithal Raut Vs. Gangadhar Dilip Sopal

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : May-04-2000

Subject : Election

Acts : Bombay High Court (Original Side) Rules, 1980 - Rule 126; Representation of People Act, 1951 - Sections 81, 82 and 86(1)

Reported in : AIR2000Bom419; 2000(3)ALLMR573; 2000(4)BomCR26; (2000)2BOMLR843; 2000(3)MhLj671

Advocate for Respondent : A.Y. Sakhare and ;L.M. Acharya, for ;Dilip Gangadhar Sopal, Advs.

ORDERR. M. Lodha, J.1. Heard Mr. M. M. Vashi, the learned Counsel for the petitioner and Mr. A. Y. Sakhare, the learned Counsel for Mr. Dilip Gangadhar Sopal. 2. By means of this chamber summons taken...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 20 2003

State of Rajasthan Vs. Sheo Singh and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-20-2003

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 147, 149 and 302;

Reported in : AIR2003SC1783; 2003CriLJ1569; JT2003(3)SC611; RLW2003(2)SC311; 2003(2)SCALE324; (2003)9SCC55

Advocate for Respondent : S.R. Bajwa, Sr. Adv., ; Ruchi Kohli and ; Sushil Kumar Jain

B.N. Agrawal, J.1. The five respondents along with nineteen other accused persons were charged and tried and by judgment dated 3rd February, 1993 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Jhalawar, other nineteen accused persons were acquitted...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 06 2004

State of Rajasthan Vs. Bhanwar Singh and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : May-06-2004

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 109, 302 and 307; Arms Act - Sections 27

Reported in : AIR2004SC3754; 2004(2)ALD(Cri)342; 2004CriLJ3345; RLW2004(3)SC433; 2004(5)SCALE711; (2004)10SCC709; 2004(2)LC1089(SC)

Advocate for Respondent : Sushil Kumar, Sr. Adv., ; Sanjay Jain, ; Vinay Arora and

B.N. Agarwal, J. 1. Application for permission to file SLP is allowed.2. Leave granted.3. Respondents Bhanwar Singh and Dharma Ram along with accused Vishnu were tried and by judgment rendered by trial court, accused Vishnu was...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 22 2014

State of U.P. Vs. Narendra and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-22-2014

Subject : Criminal

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NOs. 1551-1554 OF2008State of Uttar Pradesh …..Appellant versus Narendra and others ….Respondents JUDGMENT M.Y. EQBAL, J.These appeals by special leave by the State are...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 01 1999

Sukhar Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-01-1999

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 6, 32 and 33; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 307; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 161

Reported in : AIR1999SC3883; 1999(2)ALD(Cri)899; (2000)1CALLT52(SC); 2000CriLJ29; 1999(3)Crimes191(SC); JT1999(7)SC537; 1999(6)SCALE280; (1999)9SCC507

ORDERPattanaik, J.1. The appellant stood charged for the offence under Section 307 IPC for causing injury to Nakkal on 17.4.78 at 7.30 a.m. near the Chak in village Tejalhera in the district of Mjuzaffarnagar. On the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial