Advanced Search Results
State of Rajasthan Vs. Ucchab Lal Chhanwal
Supreme Court of India
Oct-22-2013
Land Acquisition
Ms. Sandhya Goswami, Mr. Santosh Mishra
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.9544 OF2013(Arising out of S.L.P. (C) No.21202 of 2011) State of Rajasthan … Appellant Versus Ucchab Lal Chhanwal …Respondent WITH CIVIL APPEAL No.9545 OF2013(Arising out...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskChandi Prasad and ors. Vs. Jagdish Prasad and ors.
Supreme Court of India
Oct-01-2004
PropertyLimitation
Limitation Act, 1963 - Schedule - Article 136; Limitation Act - Sections 15(1) - Schedule - Articles 182 and 183; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 2(2), 47, 48, 48(1), 96 and 100
2004(6)ALD75(SC); 2005(5)ALLMR(SC)339; 2005(1)ARC630; 2004(4)AWC3208(SC); 2004(3)BLJR1938; 2004(5)CTC67; [2005(1)JCR141(SC)]; JT2004(8)SC255; 2004(3)KLT654(SC); (2004)4MLJ1
Sandhya goswami, ; M.P. Shorawala and ; P.K. Chakravarty,
S.B. Sinha, J. INTRODUCTION :1. What would be the date from which a decree becomes enforceable for execution thereof within the meaning of Article 136 of the Limitation Act, 1963 (the Act) is the question involved...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBastiram Vs. State of Rajasthan
Supreme Court of India
Feb-13-2014
Criminal
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL No.758 OF2004Bastiram ....Appellant Versus State of Rajasthan ....Respondent WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL No.403 OF2014(Arising out of Special Leave Petition (Crl.) No.5240 of 2004) AND CRIMINAL...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Gore Lal Shakya Vs. Maharaj Singh Yadav and ors.
Supreme Court of India
Aug-18-1993
Election
Representation of the People Act, 1951 - Sections 116-A, 80-A, 81, 82, 86(1), 82(a), 81(3)
1995Supp(3)SCC407
S.R. Pandian and; Kuldip Singh, JJ.1. This appeal under Section 116-A of the Representation of the People Act, 1951 (for short ‘the Act’) is against the order dated 10-8-1990 passed by the High Court of Allahabad...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMaulvi Issa Qureshi Vs. District Judge, Deoria and ors.
Supreme Court of India
Aug-16-1996
CivilProperty
1996VIIAD(SC)397; JT1996(8)SC175; 1996(6)SCALE487; (1996)5SCC731; [1996]Supp4SCR734
Sandhya Goswami, Adv.
ORDER1. Leave granted.2. We have heard learned Counsel on both sides.3. These two appeals by special leave arise against the orders of the high Court of Allahabad dated 15.11.1995 & 1.3.1995 made in Revision Petition No....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRajendra Vithal Raut Vs. Gangadhar Dilip Sopal
Mumbai
May-04-2000
Election
Bombay High Court (Original Side) Rules, 1980 - Rule 126; Representation of People Act, 1951 - Sections 81, 82 and 86(1)
AIR2000Bom419; 2000(3)ALLMR573; 2000(4)BomCR26; (2000)2BOMLR843; 2000(3)MhLj671
A.Y. Sakhare and ;L.M. Acharya, for ;Dilip Gangadhar Sopal, Advs.
ORDERR. M. Lodha, J.1. Heard Mr. M. M. Vashi, the learned Counsel for the petitioner and Mr. A. Y. Sakhare, the learned Counsel for Mr. Dilip Gangadhar Sopal. 2. By means of this chamber summons taken...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of Rajasthan Vs. Sheo Singh and ors.
Supreme Court of India
Feb-20-2003
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 147, 149 and 302;
AIR2003SC1783; 2003CriLJ1569; JT2003(3)SC611; RLW2003(2)SC311; 2003(2)SCALE324; (2003)9SCC55
S.R. Bajwa, Sr. Adv., ; Ruchi Kohli and ; Sushil Kumar Jain
B.N. Agrawal, J.1. The five respondents along with nineteen other accused persons were charged and tried and by judgment dated 3rd February, 1993 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Jhalawar, other nineteen accused persons were acquitted...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of Rajasthan Vs. Bhanwar Singh and ors.
Supreme Court of India
May-06-2004
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 109, 302 and 307; Arms Act - Sections 27
AIR2004SC3754; 2004(2)ALD(Cri)342; 2004CriLJ3345; RLW2004(3)SC433; 2004(5)SCALE711; (2004)10SCC709; 2004(2)LC1089(SC)
Sushil Kumar, Sr. Adv., ; Sanjay Jain, ; Vinay Arora and
B.N. Agarwal, J. 1. Application for permission to file SLP is allowed.2. Leave granted.3. Respondents Bhanwar Singh and Dharma Ram along with accused Vishnu were tried and by judgment rendered by trial court, accused Vishnu was...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of U.P. Vs. Narendra and ors.
Supreme Court of India
Sep-22-2014
Criminal
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NOs. 1551-1554 OF2008State of Uttar Pradesh …..Appellant versus Narendra and others ….Respondents JUDGMENT M.Y. EQBAL, J.These appeals by special leave by the State are...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSukhar Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh
Supreme Court of India
Oct-01-1999
Criminal
Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 6, 32 and 33; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 307; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 161
AIR1999SC3883; 1999(2)ALD(Cri)899; (2000)1CALLT52(SC); 2000CriLJ29; 1999(3)Crimes191(SC); JT1999(7)SC537; 1999(6)SCALE280; (1999)9SCC507
ORDERPattanaik, J.1. The appellant stood charged for the offence under Section 307 IPC for causing injury to Nakkal on 17.4.78 at 7.30 a.m. near the Chak in village Tejalhera in the district of Mjuzaffarnagar. On the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »