Advanced Search Results

Larsen and Toubro Limited Vs. Konkan Railway Corporation Limited

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 11(6 and 8); Uncitral Model Law - Articles 6 and 11; Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 8

Reported in : 1999(3)ALLMR390; 1999(2)BomCR167; (1999)1BOMLR888; 1999(1)MhLj905

Advocate for Respondent : Ms. K.S. Bhagalia, Adv.

ORDERDr. B.P Saraf, J.1. This is a petition under sub-section (6) of section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, ('Act') for appointment of arbitrators to adjudicate the disputes and differences between the parties arising...

Prakash Harishchandra Muranjan Vs. Mumbai Metropolitan Region Developm ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Property

Acts : Land Acquisition Act; Mumbai Metropolitan Region Development Authority Act, 1974 - Sections 4, 4A, 4A(2), 7(5), 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 16A, 17 and 17(1); Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 - Sections 61, 63, 299 and 351; Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966; Maharashtra Slum Areas Act, 1971; Mumbai Metropolitan Region Development Authority (Amendment) Act, 1989; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 43, Rule 1

Reported in : 2007(1)ALLMR639; 2007(3)BomCR192

Advocate for Respondent : Kiran Bhagalia, Adv.

D.B. Bhosale, J.1. This Appeal from order under Order 43 Rule 1 (r) of the Code of Civil Procedure, challenges the order dated 23.8.2006, rendered by the City Civil and Sessions Court, Greater Mumbai, in Notice...

Motibagh Co-operative Housing Society Limited and anr. Vs. Pune Munici ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 - Sections 21(4), 22, 22A, 26, 29, 31, 31(1) and 126(4); Land Acquisition Act - Sections 6; Development Control Rules; Development Control Regulations

Reported in : AIR2005Bom304; 2005(3)ALLMR27; 2005(4)BomCR549

Advocate for Respondent : R.G. Ketkar, Adv. in W.P. No. 347/1993 for respondent Nos. 1 to 3 and in W.P. No. 2890/1993 for respondent No. 1 and ;P.M. Patil, A.G.P. in W.P. No. 347/1993 for respondent Nos. 4 to 7 and in W.P. No.

Bobde S.A., J.1. The petitioners in both these petitions are owners of land situate at Yeravada, Pune, within the limits of Pune Municipal Corporation, Motibagh Co-operative Housing Society Limited is owner of land admeasuring 83 areas...

Jaideep and Others Vs. Uday

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Education

Advocate for Respondent : Ms. Bhagalia

Oral Judgment: 1. Rule. With the consent of the Learned Counsel for the parties made returnable forthwith and heard. 2. The Writ Jurisdiction of this Court is invoked against the order dated 9-1-2014 passed by the...

Sunda Associates Vs. Ajit Kisanlal Agarwal

Court : Mumbai

Subject : PropertyLimitation

Acts : Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 - Sections 22, 23, 24, 39, 40, 43, 43(2), 43(3) and 43(4); Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 4 to 24; Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 18(1) and 18(2); Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 34 and 34(3)

Reported in : 2005(4)ALLMR69; 2005(5)BomCR428; 2005(3)MhLj362

Advocate for Respondent : S.N. Chandrachood, Adv.

Ranjana Desai, J.1. The petitioner is the original applicant. It is a proprietary concern. The petitioner's case is that the petitioner owns Flat No. 6 situate on the Third Floor, in the premises known as Sunda...

Mrs. Manisha Sandeep Gade Vs. Sandeep Vinayak Gade

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Family

Acts : Hindu Marriage Act, 1956 - Sections 13(1), 16(1), 20, 23(1), 25 and 27; Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act, 1956 - Sections 18 and 18(1); Evidence Act - Sections 3; Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 10 and 10(1)

Reported in : AIR2005Bom180; 2005(1)ALLMR564; 2005(1)BomCR554; I(2005)DMC173

Advocate for Respondent : Majula Rao and ;Kokila Kalra, Advs.

H.L. Gokhale, J.1. These two appeals filed by a wife seek to challenge the common judgment and order dated 12th February 2004 passed by Family Court No. III at Pune in Petition No. A-827 of 2000...

The Union of India, through the Indian Army, HQ, MGandG Area, through ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Respondent : Ms. Kiran Bhagalia

R.G. Ketkar, J. 1. By an Administrative Order dated 25.8.2015 passed by the Honourable Chief Justice, this Special Bench was reconstituted for hearing of the above petition and other connected matters from the Division Benches available...

Adarsh Co-op. Housing Society Ltd. A Society registered under Maharash ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Khambata

R.G. Ketkar, J. 1. By administrative order dated 25.08.2015 passed by the Hon'ble the Chief Justice, this Special Bench was reconstituted for hearing of above Petition and other connected matters from the Division Benches available at...

Chenab Bridge Project Undertaking vs.northern Railway and Anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. J.K.Singh, Ms. Madhulika Agrawal, Ms. Suchitra A. Chitate

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: April 08, 2019 % + W.P.(C) 3375/2019, CM No.15459/2019 CHENAB BRIDGE PROJECT UNDERTAKING ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Mukul Rohatgi and Mr. Dayan Krishnan,...