Advanced Search Results
Yeshwant Tukaram Raut Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.
Mumbai
Dec-12-1996
PropertyConstitution
Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 5A; Constitution of India - Article 14
1997(3)ALLMR35; 1997(4)BomCR442
C.R. Sonawane, A.G.P. for respondent Nos. 1 and 2 and ;G.S. Hegde, Adv. for respondent No. 3
V.P. Tipnis, J.1. The petitioner is a resident of Virar and survey number 264/A/33 of village Virar is owned by the petitioner having 1/3rd share in the said land and 2/3rd belonging to the petitioner's deceased...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPratibha Sambaji Kubal Vs. Ravindra Hindustan Platinum Pvt. Ltd. and o ...
Mumbai
Sep-19-1986
Labour and Industrial
Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 - Sections 10; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 25F, 25G, 25H and 25O
[1987(54)FLR328]; (1994)IIILLJ279Bom
Mahesh Bhat and ;H.M. Madon, Advs.
Pendse, J.1. These two petitions impugn the judgment and order passed by the 2nd respondent, a Member of the Industrial Court, on 17th July 1982.2. The petitioners in the petitions were appointed by the 1st respondents...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Askindu D/O. Vishnu Mahajan Vs. National Safety Council and ors.
Mumbai
Aug-05-1987
Labour and Industrial
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 25, 33C(2); National Safety Council Service Rules - Rule 16
(1995)IIILLJ341Bom
S.K. Talsania, Adv. I/b., Crawford Bayley and Co.
Bharucha, J.1. This appeal is directed against the order of summary rejection of the writ petition filed by the Appellant. Pendse, J. gave no reasons for the rejection. Having heard counsel in detail we are satisfied...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
irene Fernandes Vs. Neo Pharma (Pvt.) Ltd.
Mumbai
Jan-20-1997
Labour and Industrial
(1997)99BOMLR633
Shri. Kuldeep Singh
V.P. Tipnis, J.1. As these petitions raise common questions of law and fact they were heard together and are being disposed of by this common judgment.2. In writ petition No. 1630 of 1994 the petitioner was...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAirlines CabIn Crew Association Vs. Indian Airlines Corporation and Ot ...
Mumbai
Jul-21-1986
Labour and Industrial
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2
(1987)ILLJ285Bom
1. By this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners are seeking following reliefs :(a) The respondent No. 1 Corporation be restrained from enforcing the terms and conditions of service under...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskA.G. Kher Vs. Atlas Copco (India) Ltd. and Others
Mumbai
Mar-15-1989
Labour and Industrial
Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971; Industrial Disputes Act - Sections 25-F; Constitution of India - Article 14
(1992)ILLJ423Bom
1. This petition arises out of the complaint filed by the present petitioner in the Labour Court at Pune making grievance about unfair labour practice in the form of victimisation, by colourable exercise of the employer's...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNational Textile Corporation (South Maharashtra) Limited Vs. Shri Mhmd ...
Mumbai
Mar-28-2001
LimitationLabour and Industrial
Bombay Industrial Relations Act, 1946 - Sections 42(4), 78, 78(1)(A), 79 and 84; Bombay Industrial Relations Rules - Rule 53; Constitution of India - Article 226; Limitation Act
2001(3)ALLMR712; 2001(4)BomCR498; (2001)3BOMLR210; 2001(4)MhLj724
Ms. Nitisha Mhatre and ;Mr. P.M. Patel, Advs.
ORDERR.J. Kochar. J.1. The basic and salient feature of the Bombay Industrial Relations Act. 1946 is prompt action within the prescribed period by any party who is either affected by any change effected by the other...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIndiana Ebgubeerung Works (Bombay) Pvt. Ltd. Vs. the Presiding Officer ...
Mumbai
Jul-28-1995
Labour and Industrial
(1998)IIILLJ720Bom
B. N. Srikrishna, J. 1. This writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenges an Award of the 5th Labour Court, Bombay, dated 31st August, 1994 made in Reference (IDA) No. 507 of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskManeck Gopal Divekar Vs. Phoenix Mills Limited and ors.
Mumbai
Sep-10-1987
Labour and Industrial
Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 - Sections 30 and 30(1)
(1987)89BOMLR456; (1993)IIILLJ69Bom
B.N. Srikrishna, Adv. for Respondent No. 1
H.H. Kantharia, J. 1. Quite an interesting and important question of law that is canvassed in this Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is the interpretation of the term 'reinstatement' in labour...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskN.L. Mehta Cinema Ent. P. Ltd. Vs. Vijay G. Shivgan and ors.
Mumbai
Jan-07-1988
Labour and Industrial
Bombay Shops and Establishments Act, 1948 - Sections 66
(1993)IIILLJ351Bom
Nishita Mhatre and ;P.M. Patel, Advs. for R-1
H.H. Kantharia, J. 1. In this writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by the petitioners-employers, and award dated 7th January, 1985, made by the learned Presiding Officer, Second Labour Court, Bombay...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next ›
- Last »