Advanced Search Results
Stak Cable Arts and ors. Vs. Union Bank of India and ors.
DRAT Mumbai
Jun-10-2005
Land Acquisition
(2006)129CompCas269NULL
Mrs. Fadia
1. This appeal is sought to be filed by the appellants/original judgment-debtors. They have not filed any substantive appeal (so far) against the judgment and order passed by the learned Presiding Officer of the Debts Recovery...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskArvind Steel Company and ors. Vs. Union Bank of India
DRAT Mumbai
Jun-30-2003
Land Acquisition
II(2005)BC151
1. These two appeals can be conveniently disposed of by this common Judgment and Order because though the bills and amount of recovery in these appeals are different, the respondent Bank is the same and pleadings...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSaraswati TIn Containers Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Meta Cans and Others
Mumbai
Dec-05-1997
Commercial
Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 10; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 9, Rules 6 and 13 - Order 37, Rules 2 and 4 - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2 ; Limitation Act, 1963 - Schedule - Articles 164 and 181; Companies Act, 1956; Partnership Act, 1932; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 148
1998(2)ALLMR12; 1998(1)BomCR137; (1998)1BOMLR14
S.N. Fadia, Adv., i/b K.J. Hakani
ORDERS.S. Nijjar, J.1. The plaintiffs have filed this summary suit under the provisions of Order XXXVII, Rule 2 of the Civil Procedure Code claiming that the defendants be ordered and decreed jointly and severally to pay...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›