Advanced Search Results

Kashinath Shivba Khillare Vs. Fuley Magasvarg Vikas Mahamandal

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Service

Acts : Employment Service Rules 1983 - Rule 15

1]Heard Mrs. Deshpande for petitioner, advocate Marathe for respondent no.1, advocate Rahul Dhande for respondent no.3 & 4 and learned A.G.P. Shri Sonak for respondent no.2. Nobody appears for respondent no.5. 2] Short grievance of advocate...

Niranjan Laxminarayan Yeddeloo Vs. the State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Schedule 8 of 5 ; Maharashtra Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes, De-notified Tribes (Vimukta Jatis), Nomadic Tribes, Other Backward Classes and Special Backward Category (Regulation of Issuance & Verification of) Caste Certificates Act

Advocate for Respondent : Mrs. Deshpande, Shri. Mohgaonkar

1. The applicant/ petitioner employee of Respondent No. 3 has sought review of the judgment dated 09.04.2009 passed by this Court in Writ Petition No. 1505 of 2006. The Hon'ble Apex Court permitted its filing when...

Marotirao Bhaurao and ors. Vs. Kashinath Singh Gangusingh Raut

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Tenancy

Reported in : (1989)91BOMLR743

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Deshpande

V.V. Kamat, J.1. These three revision applications are preferred by three tenants of the same landlord under the provisions of Section 26 of the Hyderabad Houses (Rent, Eviction and Lease) Control Act, 1954 challenging their eviction...

The Official Assignee Vs. Madholal Sindhu

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Company

Reported in : AIR1947Bom217; (1946)48BOMLR828

Leonard Stone, Kt., C.J.1. This is an appeal from the judgment of Mr. Justice Bhagwati dated September 17, 1945.2. In the action the plaintiff, respondent No. 1 in this Court, sought a declaration and consequential relief...

Murlidhar Chandiram Gyanchandani Vs. Jai Agencies Through Proprietor A ...

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

Subject : Education

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Deshpande

Oral Judgment: Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. Heard finally with the consent of the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondent. 2. By this petition, the original complainant in Summary Criminal...

Dwarkadas Nathamal Vs. Vimal Alias Yamuna and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 2, Rules 1 and 2, 2(2) and 2(3) - Order 21, Rules 100 and 103; Limitation Act - Sections 2 - Schedule - Article 109

Reported in : AIR1964Bom42; (1963)65BOMLR588; ILR1964Bom68

Advocate for Respondent : D.R. Baxy and ;G.B. Gandhe, Advs.

1. The question which falls for decision in this Second Appeal is whether the suit filed by the appellant to recover mesne profits of the years 1951-52 and 1952-53 is barred under Order 2, Rule 2...

Dr. D.K. Belsare Vs. Nagpur University

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Service

Reported in : (1980)82BOMLR494

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. K.H. Deshpande

Deshpande, J.1. This is a writ petition filed by the petitioner challenging the appointment of respondent No. 3 by the Nagpur University, the respondent No. 1 to the Post of professor of Zoology in the University...

Executive Engineer and Others Vs. Ragho S/O Laxman Badkal and Others

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Respondent : Mrs. Deshpande

Oral Judgment: These appeals and cross appeals are arising from the judgment and award passed in between 28.9.2006 to 20.10.2006 by the Reference Courts at Kelapur - Pandharkawada, district : Yavatmal. The particulars of the survey...

Vithalrao Udhaorao Uttarwar and ors. Vs. the State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 13(2), 14, 15, 15(3), 16, 17, 19, 19(1), 21, 22, 25, 25(1), (2), (2A), (2B), (3), (4), (5) and (6),29(1), 31, 31(2), 31-A, 31-B, 31-C, 32, 33, 34, 35, 37, 39, 50, 53(1), 53(2), 132, 133, 226, 277, 245, 246, 268, 269, 270, 271, 272, 273, 274, 275, 276, 277, 278, 279, 301, 352, 354, 355, 357, 358, 359(1), 359(1-A), 360, 367, 368 and 394; Constitution (Fortieth Amendment) Act; Constitution (Twenty-Ninth Amendment) Act, 1972; Constitution (First Amendment) Act, 1951; Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Lowering of Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961 - Sections 2, 2-A, 2(5), 22(5), 2(9), 2(21), 2(30), 3, 3(1), 3(2), 3(14), 4, 4(1), 4(2), 5, 5(1), 8, 9, 10, 10(1), 4(1), 11, 12, 12(2), 13, 13(2), 13(3), 14, 15, 16, 16(3), 17, 17(1), 18, 21, 21-A(1), 21(4), 23, 27, 28

Reported in : AIR1977Bom99

Advocate for Respondent : R.W. Adik, Adv. General, M.M. Qazi and Naik, A.G.P.

Masodkar, J. 1. These 2661 cases have clogged the Court's corridors for considerable time, challenging the provisions of the Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961 (Act No. 27 of 1961) as amended by the...

Manvirsingh Malkhan Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Service

Reported in : (1984)86BOMLR681

Ginwala, J.1. The petitioner, by this writ petition, assails his exclusion from consideration by the departmental promotion committee for promotion to the post of Aerodrome Officer in September 1976 and February 1978, when, according to him,...