Advanced Search Results

Kuldeep Sugandh vs State of Nct & Anr & Anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Ajay Vikram Singh, Mr. Vikas Pahwa, Mr. Ayush Puri, Mr. Sultan Haider Jafri, Ms. Urvija Sharma, Mr. Ajay Vikram Singh, Mr. Anirudh Bakhru, Mr. Shadmaan Siddiqui, Mr. Vaibhav Prasad Singh

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Reserved on: 15th October, 2025 Pronounced on: 12th January, 2026 + CRL.M.C. 2985/2024, CRL.M.A. 11536/2024 (for interim directions), CRL.M.A. 24957/2025 (for filing additional documents), CRL.M.A.24958/2025 (Exemption)...

Kuldeep Sugandh vs State of Nct of Delhi and Anr

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Ajay Vikram Singh, Mr. Vikas Pahwa, Mr. Ayush Puri, Mr. Sultan Haider Jafri, Ms. Urvija Sharma, Mr. Ajay Vikram Singh, Mr. Anirudh Bakhru, Mr. Shadmaan Siddiqui, Mr. Vaibhav Prasad Singh

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Reserved on: 15th October, 2025 Pronounced on: 12th January, 2026 + CRL.M.C. 2985/2024, CRL.M.A. 11536/2024 (for interim directions), CRL.M.A. 24957/2025 (for filing additional documents), CRL.M.A.24958/2025 (Exemption)...

Sumit Mehta Vs. State of Nct of Delhi

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. M.N. Dudeja, Mr. Vikas Pahwa, Mr. Pranyab Pathak

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % BAIL APPLN. NO. 1479/2012 Date of Decision:18. h December, 2012 + # ! Sumit Mehta ....Petitioner Through: Mr. Aman Lekhi, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Ankur...

Mohd. Usman @ Haji Vs Commissioner of Police and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Respondent : Ms. Zubeda Begum, Mr. Vikas Pahwa, Mr. Saurabh Soni , Mr. Sumit Kaul, Advs.

1. Whether reporters of local paper may be allowed to see the judgment? No2. To be referred to the reporter or not? Yes2. Whether the judgment should be referred in the digest? Yes1. The grievance of...

Naresh Goyal vs.state of Nct of Delhi & Anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Ravi Nayak, Mr. Vikas Pahwa, Ms. Sima Gulati, Ms. Yashasvika Sharma, Mr. Anurag Nasiar, Mr. Sachin Choudhary

$~21 + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:-"10th July, 2018 CRL. M.C.3224/2015 NARESH GOYAL ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Ramesh Gupta, Sr. Adv. versus with Mr. Lalit Choudhary, Adv. STATE OF NCT...

Goyal Mg Gases pvt.ltd. Vs.ind Syndergy Limited & Ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Vikas Pahwa, Mr. Siddharth Agarwal, Mr. S. Santanam Swaminadhan, Ms. Nishtha Khurana, Mr. Sanjay Shukla

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~4-33. * + % TR.P.(CRL.) Nos. 37-66/2016 GOYAL MG GASES PVT LIMITED Date of Decision:19. 01.2017 ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Pramod Kumar Dubey, Mr. Rohit Priya Ranjan,...

Pushkar Mal Verma Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Delivered on :05. 03.2015 CRL.A.124/2013 REKHA SHARMA ….. Appellant ….. Respondent Versus CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Appellant For...

Ajit Singh Sangwan Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Delivered on :05. 03.2015 CRL.A.124/2013 REKHA SHARMA ….. Appellant ….. Respondent Versus CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Appellant For...

Nirmal Devi Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Delivered on :05. 03.2015 CRL.A.124/2013 REKHA SHARMA ….. Appellant ….. Respondent Versus CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Appellant For...

Rekha Sharma Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Delivered on :05. 03.2015 CRL.A.124/2013 REKHA SHARMA ….. Appellant ….. Respondent Versus CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Appellant For...