Advanced Search Results
H.P. Lakshmidevaraje Urs Vs. G.P. Asharani Alias Nandini
Karnataka
Jun-20-2002
FamilyCivil
Family Courts Act, 1984 - Sections 7(1) and 8; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 9 - Order7, Rules 10 and 11
AIR2002Kant399; I(2003)DMC303; 2002(5)KarLJ280
M.S. Varadarajan, Adv.
ORDERV. Gopala Gowda, J.1. Being aggrieved by the order dated 25-6-2001 rejecting I.A. No. II in O.S. No. 511 of 1998 passed by the Trial Court, the first defendant has presented this revision petition. The said...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of Karnataka and ors. Vs. M. Muniraju
Karnataka
Feb-25-2002
Property
Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 - Sections 38, 49, 49C, 63, 67, 67(3), 91 and 96; Karnataka Land Grant Rules, 1969 - Rule 7; Limitation Act, 1963 - Schedule - Articles 65 and 112; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 9, 80, 80(1) and 100 - Order 27, Rules 2 and 8B - Order 41, Rule 2 - Order 42, Rule 1; Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 182, 186 and 187; Constitution of India - Article 226; Karnataka Land Revenue Rules - Rule 108; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 63, 65 and 66
AIR2002Kant287; ILR2002KAR2923; 2003(1)KarLJ291
M.S. Varadarajan, Adv. in R.S.A. No. 960 of 1997 and ;K.S. Nagaraj Rao Associatesin R.S.A. Nos. 1003 to 1005 of 1997
V. Gopala Gowda, J.1. These second appeals are filed by the defendants-State Government and others questioning the legality and correctness of the judgments and decrees passed by the Principal Civil Judge (Senior Division), Bangalore Rural District,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSeshasayee Paper and Boards Limited Vs. Deputy Commercial Tax Officer, ...
Chennai
Jul-23-1981
Sales Tax
Central Sales Tax Act - Sections 5(1)
[1984]56STC8(Mad)
K.S. Bakthavatsalam, Additional Government Pleader
Balasubrahmanyan, J. 1. The only question in this sales tax revision is whether a turnover of Rs. 4,29,642.18 is entitled to exemption from the Central Sales Tax Act on the score that the sales comprised therein...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Bombay Burmah Trading Corporation Limited, a Company Incorporated Unde ...
Chennai
Oct-27-1980
Tenancy
(1981)1MLJ433
V. Balasubrahmanyan, J.1. The petitioner, Bombay Burmah Trading Corporation Limited, owns a tea estate in a place called Mudis in Anai Malais. This is a place where the petitioner's employees and other residents in the locality...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Nilgiris Co-operative Marketing Society Limited, Represented by It ...
Chennai
Apr-26-1983
Labour and Industrial
(1984)1MLJ7
ORDERT. Sathiadev, J.1. Petitioner seeks to set aside order of first respondent, dated 13th March, 1979, informing petitioner that it may got registered as a factory by applying for registration and grant of licence under Factories...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskR.Thiagarajan Vs. 1)The Superintendent of Police,
Chennai
Sep-03-2014
Education
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED :03. 09.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.MANIKUMAR AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.S.RAVI HABEAS CORPUS PETITION(MD)No.1039 of 2014 R.Thiagarajan ... Petitioner Vs. 1) The Superintendent of Police, Trichy...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKamu Alias Kamala Ammal Vs. M. Manikandan and anr.
Supreme Court of India
Sep-26-1997
Civil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 33, Rule 5
1999(I)OLR(SC)319; (1998)8SCC522
ORDER1. Leave granted. 2. The only question is whether permission to sue as an indigent person can be granted without going into the question whether there is any cause of action shown in the plaint. In...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKumaraswami Gounder and ors. Vs. Subba Gounder and ors.
Chennai
Feb-07-1977
FamilyProperty
AIR1977Mad353
Mr. Varadarajan
1. Defendants 2 to 4 and 6 to 9 in O. S. No. 17 of 1965 on the file of the Subordinate Judge of Coimbatore, are the appellants. The plaintiffs came to court for a partition...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKumaraswami Gounder and ors. Vs. Subba Gounder and ors.
Chennai
Feb-07-1977
Property
(1978)1MLJ305
Mr. Varadarajan
Ramaprasada Rao, J.1. Defendants 2 to 4 and 6 to 9 in O.S. No. 17 of 1965 on the file of the Subordinate Judge of Coimbatore, are the appellants. The plaintiffs came to Court for a...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskArulmigu Kapaleeswarar Temple, Represented by Its Executive Officer Vs ...
Chennai
Sep-12-1995
Labour and Industrial
(1996)1MLJ29
ORDERRengasamy, J.1. This appeal is against the order of the Commissioner for Workmen's Compensation-I (Deputy Commissioner of Labour-I), Madras, awarding a compensation of Rs. 67,200 to the first respondent herein, whose son by name Ramu died...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- Next ›
- Last »