Advanced Search Results
Lal Woollen and Silk Mills Pvt. Vs. Collector of Central Excise
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Aug-12-1985
Excise
(1985)(5)LC2340Tri(Delhi)
Mr. Vakharia
1. The appellants M/s Lal Woollen and Silk Mills (Private) Limited are engaged in dyeing of Worsted Woollen Yarn falling under Tariff Item No.18-B, C.E.T. They have been receiving duty paid grey yarn, under permission granted...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe State Vs. Jayantilal Gokuldas
Gujarat
Apr-02-1962
Commercial
(1963)4GLR105
Mr. Vakharia
N.M. Miabhoy, J.1. This is a group of 23 appeals in one of which two questions relating to municipal law and in the rest one such question arise for decision. The facts involved in all the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSwastik Product of Baroda Vs. Superintendent of Customs
Gujarat
Mar-30-1977
Excise
1989(21)LC162(Gujarat)
Mr. Vakharia
S. Obul Reddi, C.J.1. In this petition the petitioner, Swastik Products prays quashing of the impugned notices at Annexures 'A' 'B' and 'C' issued to it and the impugned orders of the respondents at Annexures 'A',...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
J.D. Patel and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Gujarat
Dec-11-1974
Excise
Central Excises Act, 1944
1978(2)ELT540(Guj); (1975)GLR1083
B.K. Mehta, J.1. Petitioner No. 1 is a partner of petitioner No. 2 firm carrying on business of manufacturing Resins and inter-lining material used by tailors and garment makers for collars of shirts and bush-shirts at...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHirji Madha Vs. Nagji Kurji and ors.
Gujarat
Apr-18-1963
Civil
(1964)5GLR289
M.R. Mody, J.1. This civil revision application raises an interesting question regarding the interpretation of Section 25(H) of the Bombay Agricultural Debtors Relief Act 1947 which is hereinafter referred to asthe Act.2. This matter relates to...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHashmukhlal Harjivandas Sanghvi Vs. Ishwarlal Jethalal Parekh and ors.
Gujarat
Sep-23-1985
Civil
(1986)1GLR257
A.S. Qureshi, J.1. The petitioner herein has challenged the order dated 26th August 1985 passed by the learned Judge, Small Causes Court, Surat, whereby the court had appointed a Commissioner with the direction to prepare a...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAnilbhai Natubhai Patel Vs. Jayrajbhai Jayantibhai Patel and 7 ors.
Gujarat
Feb-23-2006
Election
;Gujarat Municipalities Act, 1963 - Sections 32, 32(4), 33(1), 36 and 36(2); ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 202; ;Bombay Prohibition Act - Sections 65, 66(1), 67, 67IA, 68, 81, 118 and 119; ;Representation of the People Act, 1951 - Sections 62(5), 97 and 101; ;Copy Right Act - Sections 68A; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 302; ;Constitution of India - Article 226
(2006)2GLR1233
L. Nageshwar Rao and; Asim Pandya, Advs. for; H.L. Patel
M.S. Shah, J.1. In these petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution, three councillors of Anand Municipality have challenged the election of the first respondent herein (Jayrajbhai Jayantibhai Patel) as President of the Anand Municipality on...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAtul Gunvantrai Bhatt Vs. Commissioner of Police and ors.
Gujarat
Mar-09-1981
Criminal
1982CriLJ1895; (1981)GLR1117
B.J. Divan, C.J.1. The petitioner herein is the brother of one Bhaskar Gunvantrai Bhatt who has been detained under the provisions of Section 3, Sub-section (2), of the National Security Act, 1980 (hereinafter referred to as...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShyamprakash Spinning Mills Ltd. and anr. Vs. Administrator Madahavpur ...
Gujarat
Feb-26-2008
Banking
Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 - Sections 19(3) and 22
AIR2008Guj84; [2009]148CompCas624(Guj); (2008)2GLR1298
M.K. Vakharia, Adv. for Respondent 1 and;Government Pleader for Respondent 3
Jayant Patel, J.1. When the Civil Application came up for hearing, the main Special Civil Application is taken up for final hearing.2. The facts as such are not dispute, and in brief can be narrated as...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRampuri Kalupuri Swami and anr. Vs. Nathalal Ishwarbhai Hargovanbhai S ...
Gujarat
Dec-24-1974
Tenancy
Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 - Sections 32-P(2) and 32-PP
AIR1976Guj53; (1976)0GLR81
M.B. Shah, Adv.
J.B. Mehta, J.1. The Petitioners tenants who were in actual possession of the land in question have filed this Petition as their application under S. 32-PP of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act. 1948. hereinafter...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »