Advanced Search Results

Brihan Mumbai Electric Supply Transport Undertaking and anr. Vs. Laqsh ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 - Sections 460A, 460K, 460K(C), 460L, 460M, 460M(1) and 460M(2); Constitution of India - Articles 19(1) and 226

Reported in : AIR2010SC5; 2010(1)BomCR87; (2009)8MLJ1554(SC); 2009(14)SCALE247; (2010)1SCC620; 2010(1)LC21(SC); 2009AIRSCW7528

P. Sathasivam, J.1. Leave granted.2. All these appeals are directed against the final order and judgment dated 19.11.2008 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay in Writ Petition No. 1344 of 2007 whereby the...

Shree Maheshwar Hydel Power Corporation Ltd. Vs. Chitroopa Palit and a ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2; Constitution of India - Article 19, 19(1) and 19(2)

Reported in : AIR2004Bom143; 2004(2)BomCR137

Advocate for Respondent : Mihir Desai and ;Sonali Kunekar, Advs., i/b., ;Haresh Mehta & Co.

S. Radhakrishnan J.1. By this appeal, the appellant Company is challenging an order dated 29th March, 2003 whereby the learned Judge of the Bombay City Civil Court has dismissed the Notice of Motion and has declined...

Aruna Ramchandra Shanbaug. Vs. Union of India and Others.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Section 302, 304, 306, 309, Article 21; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Section 241(b) ; Universal Determination of Death Act - Section 1, 2, 3(6)

Reported in : AIR2011SC1290

1. Heard Mr. Shekhar Naphade, learned senior counsel for the petitioner, learned Attorney General for India for the Union of India Mr. Vahanvati, Mr. T. R. Andhyarujina, learned Senior Counsel, whom we had appointed as amicus...

People for Elemination of Stray Troubles by Its Convener Dr. Rosario M ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960 - Sections 2, 3, 4 to 10, 11 to 13, 13(3), 15, 20, 20(3), 25J, 25J(2) and 28 to 41; Goa Municipalities Act, 1968 - Sections 278, 278(1), 278(2), 278(3), 278(4), 278(5) and 278A; Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 - Sections 191BA, 191BA(1), 191BA(2), 191BA(3) and 191BA(4); Maharashtra Municipalities Act, 1975 - Sections 13, 40, 41(1) and 41(3); State of Jammu and Kashmir Government Servants (Prevention of Corruption) Act, 1962; Right to Information Act (RTI); Uttar Pradesh Municipalities Act, 1957 - Sections 6R(2); West Bengal Municipalities (Amendment) Act; Industrial Disputes (Appellate Tribunal) Act, 1950; Madhya Pradesh Municipalities Act, 1978; Employees' Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952; Acquisition Act, 1976 - Sec

Reported in : 2009(1)BomCR501

Advocate for Respondent : Subodh Kantak, Adv. General, ;Manish Salkar, AGP and ;B.V. Phadnis, Advs. for Respondent Nos. 1 to 4 in W.P.(PIL) No. 111 of 2005, ;Norma Alvaris, Adv. for Resp. Nos. 5, 6 and 7 in W.P.(PIL) No. 111 o

S. Radhakrishnan, J.1. In the above, the following questions have been>referred to us by the Hon'ble the Chief Justice:(1) Whether in the circumstances and seriousness of the problem, the danger posed and the menace caused by...

Ranchhoddas Govinddas Banatwala

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Family

Reported in : (1976)78BOMLR219; 1976MhLJ636

Madon, J.1. The interesting question which arises in this petition is whether movable property other than a liquidated sum of money is a debt as contemplated by Part X of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, so...

Omprakash Verma and ors. Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Acts : A.P. Land Reforms (Ceiling on Agricultural Holdings) Act, 1973 - Sections ; 6(1), 8(1) - he Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 - Sections 6(1).8(1),10(1),23,10(3),20(1) ,6(1),

1) These appeals are directed against a common judgment and final order dated 17.01.2007 passed by the High Court of Judicature, Andhra Pradesh at Hyderabad in Writ Petition Nos. 4121, 4141, 4144 and 5776 of 2006...

Indian Railways Catering and Vs. Cox and Kings India Ltd. and anr

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

* THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on: 28.11.2011 % Judgment delivered on:06.01.2012 + FAO(OS) 433-35 OF 2011 INDIAN RAILWAYS CATERING and TOURISM CORP. LTD. ... APPELLANT Through: Mr. Goolam E. Vahanvati,...

Ashoka Kumar Thakur Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors. (Obc Judgment)

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India (Ninety-Third Amendment) Act, 2005 - Article 15(5); ;Central Educational Institutions (Reservation in Admission) Act, 2006 - Sections 2, 2(24), 3, 4, 5, 6, 9, 9(1), 10, 12, 13 and 55; ;Societies Registration Act, 1960; ;Civil Rights Act, 1964; ; Constitution of India (86th Amendment) Act; Constitution of India (42nd Amendment) Act; ;Madras Provincial and Subordinate Services Rule, 1942; Kerala State and Subordinate Services Rules - Rules 5 and 13AA; ;Constitution of India - Articles 3(4), 12 to 35, 38, 38(1), 38(2), 39, 41, 45, 46, 47, 51A, 51A(3), 109, 117, 136, 143(1), 162, 226, 227, 292, 323A2D, 323B3D, 325, 330, 332, 334, 337, 329A(4), 334, 335, 337, 340, 341, 341(1), 342, 358, 359, 366(24), 366(25), 368, 368(2) and 371D(5); Reciprocal Insurance A

Reported in : 2008(56)BLJR1292; 2008(3)CTC97; [2008(3)JCR176(SC)]; JT2008(5)SC1; (2008)3MLJ1105(SC); 2008(5)SCALE1; (2008)6SCC1; 2008AIRSCW2899; 2008(3)Supreme331; 2008(2)LH(SC)1534; [2008] 4 SCR 1

K.G. Balakrishnan, C.J.1. Reservation for admission in educational institutions or for public employment has been a matter of challenge in various litigations in this Court as well as in the High Courts. Diverse opinions have been...

Jal Mahal Resorts P.Ltd. Vs. K.P.Sharma and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELALTE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.4912 OF2014(Arising out of SLP (Civil) 17701/2012) Jal Mahal Resorts P. Ltd. ..Appellant Versus K.P. Sharma & Ors. ..Respondents With CIVIL APPEAL NO.4913 OF2014(Arising...

Government Pleader Vs. the Groundnut Extraction Export Development Ass ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Reported in : (1977)79BOMLR226

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Vahanvati

Madon, J.1. The petitioner has filed this application in revision purporting to do so under Section 5(2) of the Bombay Court-fees Act, 1959.2. The facts which have given rise to this application are that on December...