Advanced Search Results

Chander Kesh vs Robin Baleja, Chief Executive Officer (Ceo), Delhi Can ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Right to Information

$~2 to 4* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CONT.CAS(C) 313/2026 and CM APPL.18003/2026(2) SONU .....Petitioner+ CONT.CAS(C) 314/2026 and CM APPL.18004/2026(3) CHANDER KESH .....Petitioner+ CONT.CAS(C) 316/2026 and CM APPL.18002/2026(4) DINESH .....PetitionerPresence: Mr. Sanjay...

Dinesh vs Robin Baleja, Chief Executive Officer (Ceo), Delhi Cantonmen ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Right to Information

$~2 to 4* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CONT.CAS(C) 313/2026 and CM APPL.18003/2026(2) SONU .....Petitioner+ CONT.CAS(C) 314/2026 and CM APPL.18004/2026(3) CHANDER KESH .....Petitioner+ CONT.CAS(C) 316/2026 and CM APPL.18002/2026(4) DINESH .....PetitionerPresence: Mr. Sanjay...

Sonu vs Robin Baleja, Chief Executive Officer (Ceo), Delhi Cantonment ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Right to Information

$~2 to 4* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CONT.CAS(C) 313/2026 and CM APPL.18003/2026(2) SONU .....Petitioner+ CONT.CAS(C) 314/2026 and CM APPL.18004/2026(3) CHANDER KESH .....Petitioner+ CONT.CAS(C) 316/2026 and CM APPL.18002/2026(4) DINESH .....PetitionerPresence: Mr. Sanjay...

Flight Lieutenant H.B. Misra Vs. Air Marshal M.S. Bawa, Air Officer an ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Contempt of Court

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 6, Rule 16

Reported in : 1991CriLJ1402

Advocate for Respondent : D.P. Singh and V.K. Singh, Advs.

Acts/Rules/Orders: Civil procedure Code (CPC) - Order 6, Rule 16OrderR.S. Dhavan, J.1. When this court had heard this contempt petition and delivered its order of 26 May, 1990, the issue was on the non-compliance of the...

Court on Its Own Motion Vs. State of Jharkhand

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Land Acquisition

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (PIL). No. 2774 of 2013 with W.P. (PIL) No. 3114 pf 2012 with W.P.(PIL) No. 638 of 2015 Court On its Own Motion.................. Petitioner (In W.P.(PIL)...

Ram Shanker Yadav Vs. Regional Manager, South Region, U.P. Forest Corp ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Service

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Forest Corporation Service Regulations, 1985 - Regulations 6(4), 16(3) and 16(3)(30)

Reported in : (1999)3UPLBEC2119

Advocate for Respondent : V.K. Singh, Adv.

D.K. Seth, J.1. In all these cases common questions of law and facts being involved, by consent of parties it was agreed that those may be taken up together. with permission of the Court, counsel for...

Present:- Mr. Puneet Gupta Advocate Vs. Chandigarh Administration and ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Education

CWP No.17187 of 2012 (O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 1 CWP No.17187 of 2012 (O&M) Date of decision:21.05.2013 The Managing Committee and another ....Petitioners Versus Chandigarh Administration and others...

Amit Sharma and Others. vs the State Govt of Nct of Delhi & Anr

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Hitesh Vali, Ms. Sudha Shukla, Mr. Amit Panchal

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 7677/2025 AMIT SHARMA AND OTHERS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. V.K. Singh, Advocate.versusTHE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Hitesh Vali, APP...

Raj Kumar Singh and Another Vs. District Inspector of Schools, Azamgar ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Service

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Intermediate Education Act, 1921; Uttar Pradesh Intermediate Education Regulations, 1921 - Regulations 100 and 101

Reported in : 1998(4)AWC655

Advocate for Respondent : S.C. and K.R. Singh

D.K. Seth, J.1. By an order dated 3rd November. 1997, prior approval was accorded for filling up the two posts of Assistant Clerks and four posts ofPeons. Accordingly, petitioners No. 1 and 2 were appointed on...

Ram Murat S/O Shri Santoo Vs. Commissioner, Azamgarh Division,

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Election

Acts : Essential Commodities Act, 1955 - Sections 3 and 5; Uttar Pradesh General Clauses Act, 1904 - Sections 2(14) and 24; Uttar Pradesh Scheduled Commodities (Regulation of Distribution) Order, 1990 - Sections 3 and 4; Uttar Pradesh Scheduled Commodities Distribution (Amendment) Order, 2004 - Sections 21, 27 and 28

Reported in : 2006(4)AWC3419

Advocate for Respondent : Anju Kumar, ;V.K. Singh, ;Deepak Jaiswal and ;Gulab Chand, Advs. and ;S.C.

R.K. Rastogi, J.1. The petitioners in all these 32 writ petitions were licensees of the fair price shops. Their licences have been cancelled on the ground that either they themselves or their wives or other family...