Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: mr umesh shetty · Page 1 of about 11 results (0.040 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Nov 02 2005

Mangalore Stock Exchange Vs. Securities and Exchange Board of India

Court : SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

Decided on : Nov-02-2005

Subject : Right to Information

Reported in : (2006)67SCL27SAT

ORDERS ON THE MAINTAINABILITY OF THE APPEAL BEFORE THE SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL 1. We have heard the learned senior counsel for the appellant, Mr.Umesh Shetty, and Mr. Kumar Desai, the learned senior counsel for the respondent....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 25 2005

Sharad D. Khadepau and anr. Vs. Dena Bank and ors.

Court : DRAT Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-25-2005

Subject : Land Acquisition

1. This miscellaneous appeal is filed by the appellants/ original defendant Nos. 2 (a) and 2 (b) being aggrieved by the order dated 3rd December, 2003 passed by the learned Presiding Officer of Debts Recovery Tribunal-III,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 16 2009

Central Warehousing Corporation (a Govt. of India Undertaking) Vs. For ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Dec-16-2009

Subject : ArbitrationCivil

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 2(3), 5, 7 and 8; ;Presidency Small Cause Courts Act, 1882 - Sections 17, 18, 19, 21, 22, 24, 33, 41, 41(1) and 41(2); ;Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971; Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 34, 40; Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999; Provincial Small Cause Court Act, 1887; ;Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947 - Sections 28 and 28(1); Bombay Government Premises (Eviction) Act, 1955; Bombay Municipal Corporation Act; Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Act, 1976; Maharashtra Rent Control Act; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 9A; Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 - Sections 10A; Medical University Act - Sections 5(5); Industrial Disputes Act - Sections 10(1

Reported in : 2010(1)MhLj658

Advocate for Respondent : Umesh Shetty, ;Sharila D'Souza, ;Roshan D'Souza and ;Mitesh Naik, Advs., i/b., Umesh Shetty & Co.

A.M. Khanwilkar, J.1. The question as referred by the Learned Single Judge of this Court for consideration of the larger Bench, is as follows:Whether in view of the provision of Section 5 of the Arbitration and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Aug 31 2010

Nahalchand Laloochand Pvt. Ltd.Vs. Panchali Co-operative Housing Socie ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-31-2010

Subject : Land Acquisition

Acts : Maharashtra Ownership Flats Act, 1963 - Sections 2(a-1),3(2)(h), 4(1)(a)(v),10,11, Rule 9 of 1964; Maharashtra Apartment Ownership Act, 1970; Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966; Transfer of Property Act

1.Of these seven appeals which arise from the judgment dated April 25, 2008 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay (Appellate Jurisdiction), five are at the instance of the original plaintiff and the other...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 08 2006

Bajaj Electricals Ltd. Vs. Canara Bank and anr.

Court : DRAT Mumbai

Decided on : May-08-2006

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : IV(2006)BC144

1. The short but important question, which arises in this appeal for decision is about the appropriation of a sum of Rs. 7,67,821/- which was deposited under Section 21 of the Recovery of Debts Due to...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 16 2009

Esquire Shipping and Trading Pvt. Ltd. a Company Incorporated Under th ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-16-2009

Subject : CommercialCivil

Acts : Bombay Landing and Wharfage Fees Act, 1882; Maharashtra Maritime Board Act, 1996 - Sections 24 and 105; Indian Contract Act, 1872; Major Port Trusts Act, 1963; Limitation Act; Constitution of India - Articles 32 and 226

Reported in : 2009(4)BomCR176

Advocate for Respondent : Umesh Shetty and ;Yamini Chandran, Advs., i/b., Umesh Shetty and Company, for respondent No. 1

P.B. Majmudar, J.1. By way of this writ petition, the petitioner, which is a private limited company, has invoked the writ jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India with a prayer...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 30 2005

Bank of Maharashtra Vs. Ellora Steels Ltd. and ors.

Court : DRAT Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-30-2005

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : III(2005)BC205

1. All these appeals can be disposed of by this common judgment and order as they are arising out of common judgment and order dated 4.4.2003 passed by the learned Presiding Officer of Debts Recovery Tribunal,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 03 2009

Satnam Overseas Ltd. Vs. M.V. Oocl Ability and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-03-2009

Subject : Civil

Acts : Contract Act - Sections 230; Multimodal Transportation of Goods Act, 1993

Reported in : 2009(5)BomCR275

Advocate for Respondent : N. Sumnani and ;Rahul Narichania, Advs., i/b., ;Bhat and ;Saldhana, Advs. for defendants 4 and 5 and ;Umesh Shetty and ;Yaamin Chandran, Advs., i/b., ;Umesh Shetty and Co. for defendants 6 and 7

Ganoo R.Y., J.1. The plaintiffs have filed, the suit for recovery of US Dollars 84870/-along with interest at the rate of 12% per annum from the date of filing of the suit till realisation. By prayer...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 29 2010

M/S. Associated Constructions. Vs. Mormugoa Port Trust.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-29-2010

Subject : Arbitration and Conciliation

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act,1996 - Section 11,

Advocate for Respondent : Mr.Umesh Shetty,;Ms Geeta Channe,;M/s.Mulla and Mulla and C.B.and C.,Advs.

1 This is an application under section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act,1996 for the appointment of an Arbitrator.2 There is no dispute that the parties had entered into an agreement which contains an arbitration...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 09 1995

Deluxe Enterprises Vs. Board of Trustees of the Port of Bombay

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jan-09-1995

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rule 206(3)

Reported in : 1995LC16(Bombay); 1995LC246(Bombay); 1995(77)ELT513(Bom)

Advocate for Respondent : Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud and ;Mr. Umesh Shetty, Advs.

ORDERG. R. Majithia, J.1. Rule returnable forthwith. 2. Learned counsel for the respondents waives service. 3. The petitioners have challenged the order No. SW/SPL. AUCTION SALE No. 4/4-1/13429 of 1994-95, dated December 2, 1994 cancelling sale...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial