Advanced Search Results
Mangalore Stock Exchange Vs. Securities and Exchange Board of India
SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT
Nov-02-2005
Right to Information
(2006)67SCL27SAT
ORDERS ON THE MAINTAINABILITY OF THE APPEAL BEFORE THE SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL 1. We have heard the learned senior counsel for the appellant, Mr.Umesh Shetty, and Mr. Kumar Desai, the learned senior counsel for the respondent....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSharad D. Khadepau and anr. Vs. Dena Bank and ors.
DRAT Mumbai
Feb-25-2005
Land Acquisition
1. This miscellaneous appeal is filed by the appellants/ original defendant Nos. 2 (a) and 2 (b) being aggrieved by the order dated 3rd December, 2003 passed by the learned Presiding Officer of Debts Recovery Tribunal-III,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCentral Warehousing Corporation (a Govt. of India Undertaking) Vs. For ...
Mumbai
Dec-16-2009
ArbitrationCivil
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 2(3), 5, 7 and 8; ;Presidency Small Cause Courts Act, 1882 - Sections 17, 18, 19, 21, 22, 24, 33, 41, 41(1) and 41(2); ;Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971; Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 34, 40; Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999; Provincial Small Cause Court Act, 1887; ;Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947 - Sections 28 and 28(1); Bombay Government Premises (Eviction) Act, 1955; Bombay Municipal Corporation Act; Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Act, 1976; Maharashtra Rent Control Act; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 9A; Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 - Sections 10A; Medical University Act - Sections 5(5); Industrial Disputes Act - Sections 10(1
2010(1)MhLj658
Umesh Shetty, ;Sharila D'Souza, ;Roshan D'Souza and ;Mitesh Naik, Advs., i/b., Umesh Shetty & Co.
A.M. Khanwilkar, J.1. The question as referred by the Learned Single Judge of this Court for consideration of the larger Bench, is as follows:Whether in view of the provision of Section 5 of the Arbitration and...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Nahalchand Laloochand Pvt. Ltd.Vs. Panchali Co-operative Housing Socie ...
Supreme Court of India
Aug-31-2010
Land Acquisition
Maharashtra Ownership Flats Act, 1963 - Sections 2(a-1),3(2)(h), 4(1)(a)(v),10,11, Rule 9 of 1964; Maharashtra Apartment Ownership Act, 1970; Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966; Transfer of Property Act
1.Of these seven appeals which arise from the judgment dated April 25, 2008 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay (Appellate Jurisdiction), five are at the instance of the original plaintiff and the other...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBajaj Electricals Ltd. Vs. Canara Bank and anr.
DRAT Mumbai
May-08-2006
Land Acquisition
IV(2006)BC144
1. The short but important question, which arises in this appeal for decision is about the appropriation of a sum of Rs. 7,67,821/- which was deposited under Section 21 of the Recovery of Debts Due to...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskEsquire Shipping and Trading Pvt. Ltd. a Company Incorporated Under th ...
Mumbai
Apr-16-2009
CommercialCivil
Bombay Landing and Wharfage Fees Act, 1882; Maharashtra Maritime Board Act, 1996 - Sections 24 and 105; Indian Contract Act, 1872; Major Port Trusts Act, 1963; Limitation Act; Constitution of India - Articles 32 and 226
2009(4)BomCR176
Umesh Shetty and ;Yamini Chandran, Advs., i/b., Umesh Shetty and Company, for respondent No. 1
P.B. Majmudar, J.1. By way of this writ petition, the petitioner, which is a private limited company, has invoked the writ jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India with a prayer...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBank of Maharashtra Vs. Ellora Steels Ltd. and ors.
DRAT Mumbai
Mar-30-2005
Land Acquisition
III(2005)BC205
1. All these appeals can be disposed of by this common judgment and order as they are arising out of common judgment and order dated 4.4.2003 passed by the learned Presiding Officer of Debts Recovery Tribunal,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSatnam Overseas Ltd. Vs. M.V. Oocl Ability and ors.
Mumbai
Apr-03-2009
Civil
Contract Act - Sections 230; Multimodal Transportation of Goods Act, 1993
2009(5)BomCR275
N. Sumnani and ;Rahul Narichania, Advs., i/b., ;Bhat and ;Saldhana, Advs. for defendants 4 and 5 and ;Umesh Shetty and ;Yaamin Chandran, Advs., i/b., ;Umesh Shetty and Co. for defendants 6 and 7
Ganoo R.Y., J.1. The plaintiffs have filed, the suit for recovery of US Dollars 84870/-along with interest at the rate of 12% per annum from the date of filing of the suit till realisation. By prayer...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/S. Associated Constructions. Vs. Mormugoa Port Trust.
Mumbai
Jul-29-2010
Arbitration and Conciliation
Arbitration and Conciliation Act,1996 - Section 11,
Mr.Umesh Shetty,;Ms Geeta Channe,;M/s.Mulla and Mulla and C.B.and C.,Advs.
1 This is an application under section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act,1996 for the appointment of an Arbitrator.2 There is no dispute that the parties had entered into an agreement which contains an arbitration...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDeluxe Enterprises Vs. Board of Trustees of the Port of Bombay
Mumbai
Jan-09-1995
Excise
Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rule 206(3)
1995LC16(Bombay); 1995LC246(Bombay); 1995(77)ELT513(Bom)
Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud and ;Mr. Umesh Shetty, Advs.
ORDERG. R. Majithia, J.1. Rule returnable forthwith. 2. Learned counsel for the respondents waives service. 3. The petitioners have challenged the order No. SW/SPL. AUCTION SALE No. 4/4-1/13429 of 1994-95, dated December 2, 1994 cancelling sale...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »