Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: mr ukil · Page 1 of about 18 results (0.043 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Feb 20 2002

Dilip Kumar Chatterjee Vs. Coal India Limited and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Feb-20-2002

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 12 and 226

Reported in : (2003)1CALLT405(HC)

Gorachand De, J.1. The writ petitioner, Shri Dilip Kumar Chatterjee, a senior Technical Inspector, Grade A at the Regional Sales Office, Coal India Limitedfiled this application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 07 1993

Muhammad RaisuddIn Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Apr-07-1993

Subject : ConstitutionCriminal

Acts : Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 - Sections 3, 3(1) and (3), and 4;; Constitution of India - Articles 19(1), 226 and 311(2);; Income Tax - Section 296-UD

Reported in : AIR1993Cal262

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Dipankar Gupta, Solicitor General, ;Mr. Gopal Law, ;Mr. S.K. Kundu, ;Mrs. Arati Dutta, ;Mr. S.C. Ukil and ;Mrs. Chhabi Roy (Das), Advs.

ORDERA.M. Bhattacharjee, C.J. 1. By a Notification issued under the provisions of S. 3 of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 Jammat-e-Islami Hind (hereinafter referred to as JEIH) has been declared to be an Unlawful Association...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 19 2002

Jagadamba Fiscal Services Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Birla Corporation Ltd. and anr ...

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Apr-19-2002

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958

Reported in : (2002)3CALLT87(HC)

Advocate for Respondent : Pratap Chatterjee, ;S. Basu and ;S. Maitra, Advs.

J.K. Biswas, J. 1. The defendant No. 1 in a pending suit is the appellant before us. Before we go into the merits of this appeal, let us first dispose of the application for leave to...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

May 15 1992

Subhasis Bakshi and ors. Vs. State of West Bengal and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : May-15-1992

Subject : ServiceConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 226; ;Bengal Medical Act, 1914 - Sections 15, 18 and 20; ;Bengal Medical Act, 1915; ;Paschim Banga Ayurvedic System of Medicine Act, 1961; ;Paschim Banga Unani System of Medicine Act, 1979

Reported in : (1993)1CALLT272(HC)

Advocate for Respondent : U.C. Ukil and ;Chabbi Das, Advs.

Khwaja Mohammad Yusuf, J.1. The writ petitioners, 55 in number, have underwent the Diploma course of Community Medical Service in Medical Institutions duly recognized by the State Medical Faculty of West Bengal, namely, the Institute of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 08 2002

State Vs. Urmi Ghoshal

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : May-08-2002

Subject : ConstitutionMotor Vehicles

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19 and 226; ;Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 110 and 190(2); ;Central Motor Vehicles Rules, 1989 - Rules 115, 115(2), 116, 116(1) and 126; ;West Bengal Motor Vehicles Rules, 1989 - Rule 258

Reported in : AIR2002Cal192,(2003)2CALLT151(HC)

Advocate for Respondent : Dipankar Ghosal, ;R.L. Moitra and N.I. Khan, Advs. in M.A.T. No. 2392 of 2000

A.K. Mathur, C.J. 1. Both the appeals and the connected public interest litigation and a writ petition involve common question of law, therefore, they are being disposed of by a common order. 2. The State has...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 20 2006

Raymond Ltd. (Jkft Division) Vs. H.V. Doshi and Brothers Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jan-20-2006

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Companies Act; ;Negotiable Instruments Act - Sections 138, 139 and 141; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 155(2), 156(1), 186, 200 and 482; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 120B, 420, 465, 467, 468, 469 and 471

Reported in : 2006(1)CHN578

Advocate for Respondent : Subodh Chandra Ukil and ;Chandan Kumar Ghosh, Advs.

P.N. Sinha, J.1. This revisional application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code (in short the Code) is aimed at quashing the proceeding of complaint case No. C-1024 of 2003 under Sections 420/120B of the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 24 1992

People United for Better Living in Calcutta-public and Another Vs. Sta ...

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Sep-24-1992

Subject : EnvironmentConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226;; Town and Country Planning Act

Reported in : AIR1993Cal215,97CWN142

ORDER1. Population growth and modern technological developments by themselves pose a great threat to the very existence of living and non-living organisms -- this is not confined to a particular region, but it has crossed trans-national...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 23 2001

Colliery Mazdoor Sabha of India Vs. Board of Industrial Financial Reco ...

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jul-23-2001

Subject : SICA

Acts : Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 - Section 25; ;Board of Industrial Financial Reconstruction (BIFR) Regulations, 1987 - Regulation 20; ;Constitution of India - Article 226

Advocate for Respondent : Anindya Mitra, ;Udayen Sen, ;K.H. Darsan, ;Mala Chakraborty, ;Jayanti Dhar Ouader, ;Asoka Nath Ghosh and ;Anup Kr. Biswas, Advs.

Dilip Kumar Seth, J.1. The order dated 23-2-2001 passed by the Board of Industrial Financial Reconstruction in Case No. 501 /2000 of Eastern Coalfields Ltd. has since been challenged in this writ petition on the ground...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 17 1988

B. Ghosh and Co. Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Collector of Customs

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Feb-17-1988

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Act, 1962 - Section 30(3)

Reported in : 1988(37)ELT53(Cal)

Ajit Kumar Sengupta, J.1. The Court. The first petitioner acted as the Steamer Agents of a foreign sea-going ship M.V. 'Erzuram' belonging to a foreign owner carrying on business In Turkey. The second petitioner Is a...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 30 2001

Soorajmull Nagarmull Vs. Jute Corporation of India Ltd.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jul-30-2001

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 3(17), 20, 31(7) and 34; ;Interest Act, 1978 - Section 6(2)

Advocate for Respondent : Biswaroop Gupta, Sr. Adv. and ;P.K. Chatterjee, Adv.

Asok Kumar Ganguly, J. 1. This appeal has been filed by M/s. Soorajmull Nagarmull, a registered partnership firm (hereinafter referred to as SN) challenging the judgment and order dated 16th July, 1991 by which a learned...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial