Advanced Search Results

Cit Vs. Shalimar Housing and Finance Ltd.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : [2010]321ITR157(MP)

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Sumit Nema

ORDERDipak Misra, J.1. The present appeal preferred under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) was admitted on the following substantial question of law:Whether in the obtaining factual matrix,...

Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Shubhash Traders,

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2009)226CTR(MP)372

ORDERDipak Misra, J.1. These three appeals preferred under Section 260A of the IT Act, 1961 (for brevity 'the Act') were listed for default for not filing the application for condonation of delay supported with affidavit. At...

Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Smt. Suniti Singh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2008)215CTR(MP)326; [2008]299ITR1183(MP)

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Mukesh Agrawal

Dipak Misra, J.1. In the present appeal preferred under Section 260A of the IT Act, 1961 (in short 'the Act) the following substantial question of law emanates for consideration:Whether in the facts and circumstances of the...

All India Punjab National Bank Officers' Association and Ors. Vs. Chai ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : BankingDirect Taxation

Reported in : (2010)229CTR(MP)257

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Sanjeev Tuli

ORDERDipak Misra, J.1. Regard being had to the similarity of the controversy involved in this batch of writ petitions, they were heard analogously and are disposed of by a singular order. For the sake of clarity...

All India State Bank of Indore Officers' Co-ordination Committee and O ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 17(2), 295 and 295(2); Income Tax Rules, 1962 - Rule 3; Income Tax (Amendment) Rules, 2001 - Rule 3

Reported in : (2004)186CTR(MP)649

Advocate for Respondent : Rohit Arya and ;Ajit Ade, Advs.

Dipak Misra, J.1. In this batch of writ petitions the petitioners have prayed for a declaration that Rule 3 of the IT Rules, 1962 (in short 'the Rules') which has been brought into the existence by...

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Narmada Ginning and Pressing Factory

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2007)213CTR(MP)500

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Sumit Nema

A.K. Patnaik, C.J.1. This is an appeal under Section 260A of the IT Act, 1961, filed by the CIT, Bhopal, against the order dt. 31st March, 2006, of the Tribunal, Indore Bench, Indore, for the block...

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. H.E.G. Ltd.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2010)228CTR(MP)497; [2009]310ITR341(MP)

Dipak Misra, J.1. Regard being had to the similarity of the substantial question of law involved in these appeals preferred under Section 260A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (or brevity 'the Act'), they were heard analogously...

All India State Bank of Indore Officers' Co-ordination Committee Vs. C ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : [2004]134TAXMAN303(MP)

ORDERDipak Misra, J. In this batch of writ petitions the petitioners have prayed for a declaration that rule 3 of the Income Tax Rules, 1962 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Rules') which has been brought into...

Commissioner, Commercial Tax Vs. Saurabh Metals Pvt. Ltd. and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Sales Tax/VATSICA

Reported in : (2009)24VST520(MP)

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Sumit Nema

ORDERDipak Misra, J.1. Invoking the extraordinary jurisdiction of this Court under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner, Commissioner, Commercial Tax, Government of Madhya Pradesh, has prayed for issue of a writ...

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Khushlal Chand Nirmal Kumar

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 131(1), 158BB, 158BB(1) and 158BC; Finance Act, 2002

Reported in : (2003)183CTR(MP)503; [2003]263ITR77(MP)

Advocate for Respondent : Sumit Nema, Adv.

Dipak Misra, J.1. In this appeal preferred under Section 260A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (for brevity 'the Act'), the Revenue has called in question the legal propriety of the order passed by the Income-tax Appellate...