Advanced Search Results

Mr.Vijay Singh Vs. Ministry of Health and Family Welfare

Court : Central Information Commission CIC

Subject : Right to Information

CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION Club Building (Near Post Office) Old JNU Campus, New Delhi - 110067 Tel: +91-11-26161796Decision No. CIC/AD/C/2011/000667/SG/15039 Complaint No. CIC/AD/C/2011/000667/SG Complainant : Mr. Vijay Singh S/o Mr. Sultan Singh House No.209/3 Gopal Nagar, Gurgaon-122001...

Assn. of Victims of Uphaar Tragedy and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) a ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Civil

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 12, 21, 32, 226; Cinematograph Act - Sections 12; Delhi Cinematograph Rules, 1953 - Rules 3, 3(3), 23 and 47; Delhi Cinematograph (Amendment) Rules 1981; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 161; Indian Electricity Act; Indian Electricity Rules, 1956 - Rules 32, 33, 36, 41, 42, 43, 50A, 51, 61A, 62(2), 63, 64, 64(2), 64A, 64A(2), 65 to 69; Delhi Fire (Prevention and Safety) Act, 1986; Delhi Fire (Prevention and Safety) Rules, 1987; Civil Law

Reported in : II(2003)ACC114; 2003ACJ1631; 2003IIIAD(Delhi)321; 104(2003)DLT234; 2003(68)DRJ128; 2003RLR333

Advocate for Respondent : Naveen Chawla, Adv. for Respondent No.1, ; Yashuwant Das, Sr. Adv. and ;

ORDER'. The film had a patriotic fervor and was based on the 1971 Indo-Pak war. During the matinee show of the film, immediately after the interval, the audience in the cinema hall saw smoke coming out...

institute of Human Behaviour and Allied Sciences Vs. Govt. of Nct of D ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Arvind Nayar

GITA MITTAL, J. “Salus Populi Est Suprema Lex” (Regard for public welfare is the highest law) 1. The present case reinforces the principle that adjudication on a factual situation by strict application of law would maximise...

Present: Mr. Gaurav Mohunta Advocate Vs. Ms. Neena and Another

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Land Acquisition

CRM-M- 23003 of 2014 (O&M).-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M- 23003 of 2014 (O&M).Decided on: 07.08.2014 Bharat Bhushan ....Petitioner Versus Ms.Neena and another ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE M.M.S.BEDI PRESENT: Mr.Gaurav...

Smt. Chand Kaur vs.union of India and Ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on: Judgment pronounced on:02. 08.2018 20.3.2018 * + W.P. (C) 9391/2017 1. SMT. CHAND KAUR ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Ranbir Yadav, Advocate. versus UNION OF...

Hanuman Pershad Etc. Vs. Chuni Alias Chuni Lal and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Property

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 30

Reported in : 13(1977)DLT226

Prakash Narain, J.(1) This appeal is directed against the order of an Additional District Judge, Delhi, passed on April 12, 1965 apportioning compensation between Shri Hanuman Pershad and his sons Krishan Kumar and Anil Kumar on...

M/S Saru Smelting Private Limited vs.sharda Gupta

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

* + % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RSA No.212/2017 & RSA No.213/2017 22nd August, 2017 RSA No.212/2017 M/s SARU SMELTING PRIVATE LIMITED ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sultan Singh, Sr. Adv....

Om Pal Vs. Anand Swarup (Dead) by Lrs.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949 - Sections 13(2)

Reported in : JT1988(4)SC46; (1988)94PLR699; 1988(2)SCALE1269; (1988)4SCC545; [1988]Supp3SCR391; 1989(1)LC38(SC)

Advocate for Respondent : Harbans lal, ; S.M. Ashri and ; Ashok Mahajan, Advs.

S. Natarajan, J.1. In this appeal by special leave by a tenant against the dismissal of his Revision under Section 15(5) of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act')...

Bipla Chemicals Industries Vs. Shree Keshariya Investment Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Court Rules, 1959 - Rule 9; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 433

Reported in : [1977]47CompCas211(Delhi); ILR1975Delhi901

T.P.S. Chawla, J.(1) A company known as 'Shree Keshariya Investment Limited' owns the Priyalaxmi Mills in Baroda. In March this year, and afterwards, 28 petitions were filed byvarious creditors for the winding up of this company....

Bhim SaIn Vs. Raj Devi

Court : Delhi

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 - Sections 14(1); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 11

Reported in : 1973RLR627

Rajindar Sachar, J. (1) This is an appeal by the tenant against the order of the Rent Control Tribunal dated 13.10.72 by which he set aside the order of the Additional Rent Controller dated 7-10-1969 and...