Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: mr sodhi · Page 1 of about 102 results (0.113 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jul 19 1994

Avtar Singh Alias Minto Vs. State of Delhi

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jul-19-1994

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 - Section 5

Reported in : 1995Supp(1)SCC198

A.S. Anand and; Faizan Uddin, JJ.1. Avtar Singh-appellant has been convicted for an offence under Section 5 of the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987, hereinafter TADA. Through this appeal, he has questioned his conviction...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 23 1980

Pritam Singh Vs. State of Punjab

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jul-23-1980

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 438(1); Indian Penal code, 1860 - Sections 420

Reported in : 1980CriLJ1174; 18(1980)DLT405; 1981RLR37

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Sodhi

Charanjit Talwar, J.(1) By an order passed on April 8, 1980, the petitioner was granted interim bail under section 438(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The petitioner's case in the petition was that First Information...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 02 1985

Kailash Chand Vs. the State and Others

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-02-1985

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 324 and 325; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 107 and 151; Arms Act - Sections 25 and 27

Reported in : 1986CriLJ1703; ILR1985Delhi807; 1986RLR81

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Sodhi Teja Singh

Sharief-Ud-Din, J. 1. By this petition under Art. 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has sought a writ quashing the order by which history sheet of the petitioner has been opened by the respondents...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Feb 26 1986

inder Singh Malik Vs. State and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-26-1986

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Punjab Police Rules, 1934 - Rule 23;Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 102, 109, 327, 400, 406, 409, 498A and 506; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 244, 245 and 246; Prevention of Corruption Act - Sections 5(2)

Reported in : 1986(3)Crimes191; 30(1986)DLT92; 1986(10)DRJ317; 1986RLR244

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Sodhi

Charanjit Talwar, J.(1) By this petition Inder Singh malik seeks issuances of an appropriate writ under Article 226 of e Constitution of India for quashing the history sheet opened by the police authorities in accordance with...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 12 1990

Harjit Singh Vs. State and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jul-12-1990

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 307, 323 and 506

Reported in : 42(1990)DLT224; 1990(19)DRJ136

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Sodhi

M.K. Chawla, J. (1) Rule D B. (2) The present, petition of Harjit Singh is for issuance of an appropriate writ of certiorari for quashing the order of Deputy Commissioner of Police (East) ordering the registration...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 25 2014

Present: M/S Sukhdeep Singh Sandhu and Y.K.Saxena Advocates for the Vs ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Feb-25-2014

Subject : Land Acquisition

1 CR.A.No.292-DB of 2009, CR.A.No.632-DB of 2008 & CR.A.No.725-DB of 2008 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision:25. 02.2014 CR.A.No.292-DB of 2009 Abdul Latif Adam Momin …Appellant Versus Union of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 27 1959

Bhura Mal Dan Dayal Vs. Imperial Flour Mills Ltd. and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Apr-27-1959

Subject : Civil

Acts : Court-fees Act, 1870 - Sections 1, 5, 13 and 30; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 7, Rule 10

Reported in : AIR1959P& H629

Advocate for Respondent : H.L. Sarin, Adv. and; L.D. Kaushal, Deputy Adv. General

I.D. Dua, J. 1. The plaintiff originally instituted the suit in the Civil Court at Delhi but it was held that Delhi Court had no jurisdiction with the result that the plaint was returned for being...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 16 2015

Narender Kumar Vs. State of Nct of Delhi

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-16-2015

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.447 OF2010Narender Kumar …Appellant VERSUS State of NCT of Delhi …Respondent With CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.484 OF2010JUDGMENT Fakkir Mohamed Ibrahim Kalifulla, J.The appellant in Criminal...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 05 1965

Harbans Singh, Harnam Singh and ors. Vs. the State of Punjab and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Apr-05-1965

Subject : Civil

Acts : Northern India Canal and Drainage Act, 1873 - Sections 57; Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 4, 6, 17, 23, 24, 30A and 30D; Land Acquisition Act, 1870 - Sections 9 to 12 , 14, 15, 18 to 23, 26 to 40, 51, 57, 58 and 59; Punjab Land Preservation Act, 1900

Reported in : AIR1965P& H356

S.B. Capoor, J.(1) This Letters Patent appeal is directed against the order, dated the 7th January, 1965 of a learned Singh Judge of this Court whereby he dismissed the appellants civil writ petition under Arts. 226/227...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 25 1961

Hiralal Kher Vs. Chief Settlement Commissioner and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : May-25-1961

Subject : Property

Acts : Displaced Persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act, 1954 - Sections 24 and 24(3); Displaced Persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Rules, 1955 - Rule 105; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 41, Rule 11

Reported in : AIR1961P& H545

Advocate for Respondent : L.D. Kaushal, Sr. Dy. Adv. General

G.D. Khosla, C.J.1. In this reference we are concerned with the manner in which a revision before the Chief Settlement Commissioner under Section 24 of the Displaced Persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act, 1954, must be dealt...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial