Advanced Search Results

Mohan Ram Vs. State

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Service

Reported in : 1996(1)WLN94

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Singhvi

N.K. Jain, J.1. Mr. Choudhary, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this case is squarely covered by the decision of this Court rendered in S.B.C. Writ Petition No. 260/93 decided on 13.2.1996 and D.B.C. Special...

Shri Mishrimal Jethmal Oswal Vs. the Municipal Council of Lonavala, Th ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 2(2), 2(9), 99 and 108 - Order 20, Rules 1 to 8 - Order 49, Rule 3; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 537; Constitution of India - Article 226; Indian Penal Code

Reported in : AIR2006Bom190; 2006(3)ALLMR18; 2006(3)BomCR156; 2006(3)MhLj609

Advocate for Respondent : S.G. Aney, Sr. Counsel, ;C.S. Balsara, ;H.N. Vakil and ;D.D. Mehta, Advs., i/b., Mulla & Mulla for Respondent No. 4 and ;S.V. Pitre, Adv. for Respondent No. 1

D.B. Bhosale, J.1. The principal question, which arises for determination in this Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent, is whether the Judgment prepared by a member of the Division Bench and thereafter signed by...

Anz Grindlays Bank Ltd. Vs. Grindlays Bank Employees Union and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 25F; Bombay Shops and Establishments Act, 1948; Bombay Shops and Establishments Rules; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : (2000)IIILLJ629Bom

R.M. Lodha, J.1. The award passed by the Central Government Industrial Tribunal No. 2, Mumbai on June 30, 1997 adjudicating two references namely Reference No. CGIT-2/47 of 1993 and Reference No. CGIT-2/26 of 1995 is under...

Maharashtra State Co-operative Bank Limited and anr. Vs. the State of ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Banking

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 9 - Order 1, Rule 1; Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 - Sections 2(2), 2(10), 60 and 70; National Bank for Agricultural and Rural Development Act, 1981 - Sections 2; Banking Regulation Act, 1949 - Sections 18, 24 and 56; Multi-State Co-operative Societies Act, 1984 - Sections 3 and 5; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 1997(3)BomCR4

Advocate for Respondent : C.J. Sawant and ;N.M. Zambre, Advs. for respondent Nos. 1 & 2, ;D.Y. Chandrachud and ;G.S. Kulkarni, Advs., i/b., Crawford Bayley & Co. for respondent No. 3, ;M.S. Sanghavi, ;S.C. Dharmadhikar

N.D. Vyas, J.1. By the present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners have challenged the legality and validity of the Notification dated 30th December 1995 issued by the State of...

Miss Kamlesh Bhardwaj Etc. Vs. State of Rajasthan and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : ServiceConstitution

Reported in : 1982WLN358

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Singhvi

G.M. Lodha, J.1. As the stenographers are on strike, the judgment in these bunch of 31 writ petitions is being dictated on dictaphone.2. This is a bunch of 31 writ petitions filed by unsuccessful candidates who...

Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited Vs. Maharas ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Rohatgi, Mr. Singhvi, Mr. Mukerjee, Ms. Divya Anand

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.1843 OF2021MAHARASHTRA STATE ELECTRICITY DISTRIBUTION COMPANY LIMITED ....Appellant(s) versus MAHARASHTRA ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION & ORS. .…Respondent(s) JUDGMENT Indira Banerjee, J.This appeal, under Section 125...

Muktaram Sitaram Shinde Vs. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1997(4)BomCR418; 1997CriLJ3458

Advocate for Respondent : C.J. Sawant, Advocate General and ;Mrs. V.S. Dighe, Additional Government Pleader

ORDER1. One Muktaram Sitaram Shinde, a life convict undergoing punishment in the Kolhapur Central Jail, Kalamba, addressed, a letter dated 17th July, 1995 to the learned Chief Justice of this Court, which has been treated as...

Mangesh Janardhan Mohite (President) and ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : CivilProperty

Acts : Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Act, 1976 - Sections 16, 41, 42, 76, 95B and 184; Greater Bombay Development Control Regulations, 1991 - Regulation 33(7); Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 - Sections 44

Reported in : 2002(3)ALLMR660; 2002(5)BomCR653

Advocate for Respondent : Shekhar Naphade, Sr. Adv., i/b., Sameer Tendulkar, Adv. in W.P. No. 1288/2001 and in C. S. No. 171/2001 in W.P. No. 1288/2001, for respondent Nos. 13 to 15, ;P. Janardhanan, A.G. and R.M. Sawant, G.P.

H.L. Gokhale, J.1. These two petitions raise important questions of law with respect to some of the provisions of Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Act, 1976 (hereinafter referred to as 'MHAD Act') concerning development of acquired...

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Dr. A.M. Singhvi

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2007)212CTR(Raj)1; [2008]302ITR26(Raj)

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Singhvi

P.B. Majmudar, J.1. This appeal is directed against the judgment delivered by Tribunal, Jodhpur Bench, Jodhpur, in ITA No. 395/1999, by which the Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by Revenue and affirmed the order passed by...

Central Academy Education Society Vs. Jaipur Development Authority

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Civil

Reported in : 1987(2)WLN744

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Singhvi

Dinkar Lal Mehta, J.1. This revision petition has been preferred by the petitioner against the order passed by the learned Addl. Distt. Judge, Jaipur City, No. 3, Jaipur on 20th March, 1987, where by the order...