Advanced Search Results

Phantom Films Pvt. Ltd. and Another Vs. Central Board of Film Certific ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Miscellaneous

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Sethna

Oral Judgment: (S.C. Dharmadhikari, J.) 1. Rule. Respondents waive service. By consent, Rule is made returnable forthwith. 2. By this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners seek a writ of certiorari...

i.T.C. Limited Vs. M.K. Chipkar and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Excise

Acts : Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 27; Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rules 2, 11, 173C and 173F; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 3, 4, 11A, 11B and 40; Constitution of India - Article 226; Contract Act - Sections 72; Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 17(1)

Reported in : 1986(9)ECC385; 1987(10)LC531(Bombay); 1985(22)ELT334(Bom)

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Sethna

1. This appeal is directed against the decision dated April 6, 1977, of the learned Single Judge (Rege J.) dismissing the petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution claiming a refund of excess excise duty...

Godrej Industries Ltd. Vs. Asstt. Collector of C. Ex. Overruled

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 4(4), 11D, 12

Reported in : 2003(161)ELT68(Bom)

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Sethna

H.L. Gokhale, J.1. The petitioner is a public limited company engaged in the manufacture of a variety of cosmetics and toilet preparations including liquid hair dyes amongst other products. Respondent No. 1 to this petition is...

Oswal Woollen Mills Ltd. Vs. Union of India

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 111; Central Excise Act

Reported in : 1989(23)LC286(Bombay); 1989(43)ELT57(Bom)

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Sethna

1. This petition concerns the import of woollen rags.2. Woollen rags, by reason of an exemption notification dated 21st March 1959, were totally exempt from Customs duty.3. The petitioners imported five consignments of woollen rags in...

Josts Engineering Limited, Bombay Vs. Union of India and Another

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 226; Employees Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provision Act, 1952 - Sections 14B

Reported in : (1983)85BOMLR12; (1983)IILLJ436Bom; 1983MhLJ454

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Sethna

1. This writ petition impugns the order of the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, Maharashtra (the second respondent) levying damages against the petitioner under the provisions of S. 14B of the Employees Provident Funds & Miscellaneous Provision...

Western Bengal Coal Fields Ltd. Vs. Union of India

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rules 11 and 173J; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 11A and 11B

Reported in : 1989(24)LC118(Bombay); 1989(43)ELT27(Bom)

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Sethna

1. The 1st petitioners manufacture phenol formaldehyde moulding power. By a notification dated 1st June 1971 partial exemption from excise duty was given to phenolic resins. During August and September 1974 the petitioners did not claim...

Krislon Texturiser Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act

Reported in : 1989(25)LC179(Bombay); 1989(44)ELT448(Bom)

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Sethna

1. The petitioners imported partially oriented yarn (POY) of 115 deniers. Countervailing duty (CVD) thereon was regulated by the provisions of Item 18 II(i)(a) of the Central Excise Tariff. An Excise exemption notification dated 11th May...

Extrusion Processes Pvt. Ltd. and Others Vs. Union of India and Anothe ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act - Sections 4 and 4(4)

Reported in : 1988LC218(Bombay); 1987(31)ELT866(Bom)

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Sethna

ORDER1. Both these petitions can be disposed of by a common judgment. These two petitions were filed in the wake of various judgments that practically allowed post-manufacturing expenses of every sort, deductible from the excise duty...

Bombay Paints and Allied Products Ltd. Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Excise

Acts : Customs Tariff Act, 1975; Central Excise Act

Reported in : 1985(21)ELT663(Bom)

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Sethna

1. The Petitioners, Bombay Paints and Allied Products Ltd., are engaged in the manufacture of paints. In January 1977 the petitioners imported three metric tons of 'Aluminum Silicate P. 820'. After the arrival of the goods...

Alkem Laboratories Pvt. Ltd. and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Excise

Reported in : 1989(20)LC219(Bombay)

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Sethna

Bharucha, J.1. The petitioners manufacture preserved foods and patent medicines. Their product 'Alprovit Liquid' was classified under Tariff Item IB of the 1st Schedule to the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944. It appears that the...