Advanced Search Results

Union of India (Uoi) Vs. Sansar Chand and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : LimitationCivil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Section 149; ;Arbitration Act, 1940 - Section 8 and 8(1); ;Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 56, 73, 126 and 127

Reported in : AIR1960HP1

Advocate for Respondent : V.V. Mahajan, Adv.

T. Ramabhadaran, J.C.1. This appeal, by a plaintiff, arises out of a suit for the recovery of a sum of Rs. 32,726/-/-, representing the balance due to him (the plaintiff) from defendants 1 and 2 (Sansar...

Nartnden Gopal and Co. Vs. Northern India Timber Supply Company

Court : Delhi

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 115

Reported in : ILR1973Delhi544

Anand, J. (1) This petition must be dismissed on the short ground that the impugned order is beyond the revisional jurisdiction of this Court under section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The petition has...

M/S. Taneja Developers and Infrastructure Ltd. and Vs. the Official Li ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Respondent : M/s. Delhi Automobiles Ltd. Learned, Mr. Sethi, Mr. Mahajan, Mr. Sibal

$~1 & 2 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:12. 07.2013 Decided on:22. 08.2013 + CO.APPL.26/2011, C.M. NO. 7989/2011 (for stay) M/S. TANEJA DEVELOPERS AND INFRASTRUCTURE LTD. AND ANR. ..... Appellants...

Present: Mr. Sanjiv Bansal Advocate Vs. State of Haryana and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Sethi

CWP No.2768 of 2007 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.2768 of 2007 Date of Decision:10. 09.2013 Mukesh Malhotra ..... Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others ..... Respondents CORAM:-...

Union of India and ors Vs. Mukesh Kumar

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Sethi

HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AT JAMMU. LPASW No. 160 OF 200.Union of India and ors Petitioners Mukesh Kumar Respondent !Mr. R. Koul, CGSC ^Mr. Sunil Sethi, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Ravi Abrol, Advocate Honble...

Lajya Ram Vs. Jalil-ur Rehman and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Contract

Acts : Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 219

Reported in : 3(1967)DLT672

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Sohan Lal Sethi, Mr. Sethi

S.N. Andley, J. (1) The plaintiff, who is the appellant before us, -has filed this appeal against the decree of Shri K. K. Gujral, Sub Judge 1st Class, Delhi, dismissing his' suit. The appellant had filed...

Vineet Kumar Gupta Vs. Pradip Kumar Gupta

Court : Delhi

Subject : Property

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 39, Rule 1

Reported in : 1996IAD(Delhi)891; 61(1996)DLT734; 1996(36)DRJ685

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Sethi

N.G. Nandi, J. (1) On attaining the majority, the plaintiff has filed the suit for declaration that the agreements, one dated 1.7.1977 and the other dated 21.8.1979, executed between defendants No. 1to 5 and the General...

Asif Jehan Gattu and anr. Vs. Executive Officer Doda Municipal Corpora ...

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Subject : Election

Reported in : 2008(2)JKJ748

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Sethi

Y.P. Nargotra, J.1. Through this writ petition, the petitioners seek to question the validity of Chief Electoral Officer's order dated 28-11-06 by virtue of which they have been disqualified and order dated 18-4-07 passed by the...

Patri Swamy Rural Teacher Training Institution vs National Council for ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Sethi

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 4371/2026 & CM APPL. 21258/2026PATRI SWAMY RURAL TEACHER TRAINING INSTITUTION.....Petitioner Through: Ms. Arunima, Ms. Swati Jhunjhunwala, Advs.versusNATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION THROUGHITS CHAIRPERSON & ANR......Respondent...

Dr. Devinder Kumar Gupta and ors. Vs. Realogy Corporation and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Arbitration and Conciliation

Acts : Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 34, 48, 11; Arbitration Act, 1940 - Section 24; Companies Act; Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Section 34; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Section 96 - Orders 41, 11 Rules 1, 11

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. P.V. Kapur; Mr. Anish Dayal; Mr. Siddharth Vaid; Mr. Aman Anand; Mr. Ranabir Dutta; Mr. Rajiv Nayar; Mr. Prateek Jalan; Mr. Siddharth Bhatnagar; Mr. Darpan Wadhwa; Mrs. Sonia Dube; Mr. S. Chakraborty, Advs.

1. This Appeal challenges the Order dated 4.5.2011 of the learned Single Judge who has concluded that the Court cannot go into the controversy concerning the existence or validity of the Arbitration Clause invoked by one...