Advanced Search Results

Hirendra Kumar Mitter Vs. Sudhangshu Shekhar Paul

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Civil

Acts : Calcutta High Court Rules - Rule 72

Reported in : AIR1977Cal149,80CWN1015

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Sen

Masud, J. 1. We delivered a judgment in this appeal on January 6, 1976 allowing the appeal, after hearing the Counsel for the appellant. On that day nobody appeared on behalf of the respondent. Thereafter, the...

Birendra Kumar Vs. Coal India Limited Through Its C.M.D. and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Service

Reported in : [2008(4)JCR695(Jhr)]

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Sen

R.K. Merathia, J.1. Heard the parties finally.2. Mr. Kalyan Roy, appearing for the petitioner submitted that petitioner has challenged the notice dated 5.6.2008 (Annexure-4) by which several employees including the petitioner have been asked to appear...

N. Malla (Prof.) and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Service

Advocate for Respondent : Mrs. S. R. Sen, Mr. Sen

D. Biswas, J.1. Both the appeals arise out of a common judgment and order dated 13.9.2002 passed by a learned Single Judge of this Court in WP(C) Nos. 174 (SH)/01 and 233 (SH)/01. The Writ Appeal...

Krishna Kumar Khemka and anr. Vs. Jagadish Narayana Bhan and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Limitation

Acts : High Court Rules; ;Hogh Court Orders; ;Calcutta High Court Original Side Rules - Rule 34; ;Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 5 and 17(1) - Schedule - Article 124; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 11and 12(2) - Order 23, Rule 1(3)

Reported in : AIR1971Cal322,75CWN573

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Sen

B.C. Mitra, J.1. This is an application for condonation of the delay in making an application for review under Order 47 of the Civil Procedure Code, and for an order that the memorandum of Review presented...

Eastern Coal Co. Ltd. Vs. Income-tax Officer, a Ward and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 147 and 148; ;Income Tax Act, 1922 - Section 34(1)

Reported in : [1970]78ITR700(Cal)

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Sen

K.L. Roy, J.1. This is an application under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the validity of a notice issued by the respondent-Income-tax Officer, under Section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as...

Maharaja Srish Chandra Nandi by Manager Kasimbazar Raj Wards Estate Vs ...

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Tenancy

Reported in : AIR1942Cal445

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Sen

Pal, J.1. This is an appeal by the plaintiff in a suit for recovery of arrears of rent. Defendant 11 appears and contests the suit alleging that the tenancy is a niskar one. The learned Munsif...

Burn Standard Co. Ltd. Vs. Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Limited

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Contract Act, 1872 - Section 126; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Section 20

Reported in : AIR2000Cal283,[2001]103CompCas541(Cal)

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Sen

Ashok Kumar Mathur, C. J.1. This is an appeal arising out of an order dated 14th March, 2000 passed by the Learned single Judge in W.P. No. 2924 of 1999 whereby the Learned single Judge held...

Rentworks India Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Small Industries Development Bank of Ind ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Sen

1. The question in the present Notice of Motion is, whether, having regard to the Plaintiffs case in the suit herein as noted below, the Defendant should be restrained by a temporary injunction (a) from prosecuting...

C Krishniah Chetty And Sons Private Limited Vs. Deepali Company Privat ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Sen

R COM.APPEAL.61/2021 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE27H DAY OF MAY2021PRESENT THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA AND THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S.VISHWAJITH SHETTY COMMERCIAL APPEAL No.61/2021 BETWEEN: C.KRISHNIAH CHETTY...

Suraj Ratan Thirani and ors. Vs. the Azamabad Tea Co. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Property

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 2, Rule 2 - Order 9, Rule 9; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 41; Crown Grants Act - Sections 3

Reported in : AIR1965SC295; [1964]6SCR192

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Sen

Ayyangar, J.1. This is an appeal preferred, by virtue of a certificate of fitnessgranted by the Calcutta High Court, against its judgment, by which the decreepassed by the Subordinate Judge of Darjeeling was substantially affirmed. 2....