Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: mr sanjiv sachdeva · Page 1 of about 7 results (0.063 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jul 30 2010

Deepak Khosla Vs Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jul-30-2010

Subject : Land Acquisition

Acts : Sections 15(1)(c),15(2), 3(1),3(2),14,2(c)

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Sanjiv Sachdeva, Mr. Preet Pal Singh, Mr. Vibhu Verma , Mr. Chitranshul Sinha, Mr. Rajiv Bansal, Advs.

1. Whether Reporters of Local newspapers may be allowed to see the Judgment?2. To be referred to the Reporter or not?3. Whether the Judgment should be reported in the Digest?ORDER.1. The petitioner herein has preferred a...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 21 2000

Shadi Lal (Deceased) Through Lrs. Vs. Competent Authority and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jul-21-2000

Subject : Property

Acts : Slum Areas (Improvement and Clearance) Act, 1956 - Sections 19(1)

Reported in : AIR2001Delhi76; 2000(56)DRJ522

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Sanjiv Sachdeva

ORDERManmohan Sarin, J.1. The present petition dated 20.2.1978, had been instituted by Shri Shadi Lal on assailing the order dated 12.1.1978, passed by respondent No. 1 competent authority granting permission to the respondent/land-lords under Section 19(1)...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 11 2010

Ms. Sadhna Payal and ors. Vs. Director of Education and anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-11-2010

Subject : Service

Acts : Delhi School Education Act, 1973 - Sections 4, 10 and 24; Delhi School Education Rules; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 167(2010)DLT111

Advocate for Respondent : Sanjiv Sachdeva, Adv. for Respondent No. 2 and ; Sujata Kashyap, Adv. for Respondent No. 1

Kailash Gambhir, J.1. By this writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India the petitioners seek directions to respondent No. 2 for the implementation of the recommendations of the 5th Pay Commission and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

May 12 1995

Suraj S.J. Bahadur Vs. Shakji S.J. Bahadur

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-12-1995

Subject : FamilyProperty

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 6, Rule 17

Reported in : 1995(34)DRJ224

Usha Mehra, J. (1) The plaintiff has sought the amendment of his plaint by this application. He wants to incorporate in detail the facts regarding setting up of a 'Will' dated 10.7.1981 by the defendant and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 08 1998

Harminder Kumar (Cap.) Vs. Union of India

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-08-1998

Subject : Service

Acts : Army Act, 1950 - Sections 19 and 122 - Rule 14(2)

Reported in : 1998VIAD(Delhi)368; 75(1998)DLT597

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Sanjiv Sachdeva, Adv.

ORDERK. Ramamoorthy, J.1. The petitioner has challenged in the writ petition the show-cause notice dated 28.2.1984 issued under Army Rule 14 read with Section 19 of the Army Act, 1950.2. The case of the petitioner is...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 23 2000

iind Lt. B.S. Bamhrah Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-23-2000

Subject : Civil

Acts : Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 14

Reported in : 2000VAD(Delhi)865

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Sanjiv Sachdeva, Adv.

ORDERVikramajit Sen, J.1. The plaintiff has filed the present suit for the recovery of damages/compensation because he sustained severe injuries paralysing and de-capacitating him completely during the 4th Himalyan Car Rally when the Army service vehicle...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 30 2001

Shri Parimal Singh Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-30-2001

Subject : Service

Acts : CRPF Act, 1949 - Sections 11 and 12; CRPF Rules, 1955 - Rules 11, 27, 28 and 29

Reported in : 2001IVAD(Delhi)679; [2001(91)FLR317]

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Sanjiv Sachdeva and ; Ms. Priya Mehra, Advs.

ORDERVikramajit Sen, J.1. The Petitioner was recruited into the C.R.P.F. on 24.4.1991. After over seven years of service he has been dismissed in terms of the impugned order dated 8.12.1997 of the Commandant 81 BN CRPF....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial