Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: mr sanjeev sachdeva · Page 1 of about 36 results (0.100 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Nov 02 2011

Arun Kumar Bhatia and anr Vs. Vijay Kumar and ors

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Nov-02-2011

Subject : Income Tax

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 276 CC, 140(c), 139, 276-D, 278-B

1. Issue notice.2. Mr.Sanjiv Rajpal, Senior Standing Counsel for Income Tax accepts notice on behalf of respondent No.1.3. With the consent of counsel for parties, matter is taken up for disposal.4. Vide the instant petition, the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 16 2011

Ajay Kumar Joshi and ors. Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Aug-16-2011

Subject : Service

Acts : IAS (Cadre) Rules, 1954 - Rule 4(2); IAS (Fixation of Cadre Strength) Regulations, 1955; All India Services Act, 1951; Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957 - Section 96

Advocate for Respondent : Mr.A.S.Chandhiok; Mr.Sanjeev Sachdeva, Advs.

1. Regard being had to the commonality of controversy, this batch of writ petitions was heard together and is disposed of by a singular order. Ajay Kumar Joshi, the petitioner in W.P.(C) No.3457/2011, preferred two original...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 25 1998

Madan Lal Vs. Union of India and anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-25-1998

Subject : Service

Acts : Army Act, 1950 - Sections 71, 72 and 73

Reported in : 1998VIIAD(Delhi)65; 4(1998)CLT368; 75(1998)DLT750

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Sanjeev Sachdeva, Adv.

K. Ramamoorthy, J.1. The fact that the respondents held Court Martial against the petitioner and that the punishment of dismissal was passed is not in dispute. The petitioner claimed pension for the service rendered by him....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Sep 13 2010

Major Alok Shukla Vs Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-13-2010

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Section 302

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Sanjeev Sachdeva, Adv.

1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the Judgment? Yes2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? Yes3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? ORDER.1. The petitioner's grievance...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 17 1999

Surat Singh (Ex.Ct.) Vs. Union of India

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-17-1999

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 1999IVAD(Delhi)409; 1999(50)DRJ351

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Sanjeev Sachdeva, Adv.

ORDERK. Ramamoorthy, J.1.The petitioner has claimed disability pension. The petitioner was enrolled in the Central Reserve Police Force on the 10th of July, 1964. In the year 1967, the petitioner suffered from Myopia and on the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 09 2011

Devendra Kumar and anr. Vs. Govt. of Nct of Delhi and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-09-2011

Subject : Land Acquisition

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 171

Advocate for Respondent : Mr.Nazmi Waziri; Mr.Sanjeev Sachdeva; Mr. Sanjeet Ranjan; Mr. P. Mehta; Mr. Rakesh Tiku; Mr. Mrityunjay Kumar; Mr. Aman Lekhi; Mr. Mohit Gupta; Mr. Rupinder Pal Singh; Mr. M.A. Hashmi; Mr. S.P. Kalra; Mr. Mahavir Singh, Advs.

1. In these two writ petitions, the controversy involved being common although the nature of challenge is from different spectrums, namely, one involving the interpretation of Rule 31(A) of the Bar Council of Delhi Election Rules,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 09 2011

Peoples Union for Democratic Rights and Others Vs. Union of India and ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-09-2011

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Sanjeev Sachdeva And Ors.

ORDER1. This Court on earlier occasion had directed personal presence of competent authorities of certain organizations. In pursuance of the earlier order, Mr. Anil Kumar Singh, Labour Commissioner-cum- Secretary of the Board, Mr. Virender Prasad, General...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 22 2012

M/S. Inca Builders Vs. Housing and Urban Development Corporation

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-22-2012

Subject : Land Acquisition

IA No. 12018 of 2007 (u/Sections 30 and 33 of the Arbitration Act, 1940) 1. These are objections under Sections 30 and 33 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 (‘Act’) to the Award dated 28th April 1999...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 01 2017

Commissioner of Customs vs.emd Locomotive Technologies Pvt Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Nov-01-2017

Subject : Land Acquisition

$~14 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CUSAA602017 Date of decision:1. t November, 2017. COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS versus Through: Mr.Aditya Singla, Sr. Standing Counsel with Mr. Mohit Pandey, Adv. ..... Appellant...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 19 2006

Court on Its Own Motion Vs. Mr. Gulshan Bajwa

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Oct-19-2006

Subject : Contempt of Court

Acts : Contempt of Courts Act, 1926 - Sections 13; Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 - Sections 3, 5, 6, 8, 9, 13, 17(5) and 19(3); Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 65, 110 and 161(2); Constitution of India - Article 215; Contempt of Courts (Amendment) Act; Probation of Offenders Act, 1958 - Sections 3, 4 and 12

Reported in : 141(2007)DLT111

Advocate for Respondent : Party-in-person

Swatanter Kumar, J.1. The meaning of the expression 'contempt' in normal parlance is an act of state of despising, the conduct that defies the authority or dignity of a Court. It is so because such conduct...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial