Advanced Search Results

Ratanji Ardeshir Dubash Vs. the State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Reported in : (1970)72BOMLR304

Tulzapurkar, J.1. The petitioners, who are trustees of A. B. Dubash Trust and as such own a building called 'Villa Ramona' situate at Nepean Sea Road, Bombay, have filed this petition under Article 226 of the...

NagIn Mansukhlal Dagli Vs. Haribhai Manibhai Patel

Court : Mumbai

Subject : CivilTenancy

Acts : Presidency Small Cause Courts Act, 1882 - Sections 19, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45 and 46; Presidency Small Cause Courts (Maharashtra Amendment) Act, 1975; Bombay City Civil Court Act, 1948 - Sections 3; Bombay High Court Letters Patents Amendment Act, 1948; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 20, Rule 12; Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947 - Sections 28; Bombay Government Premises (Eviction) Act, 1955; Bombay Municipal Corporation Act; Bombay Housing Board Act, 1948; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 108; Special Marriage Act, 1954 - Sections 37; Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 25; Indian Divorce Act, 1869 - Sections 37; Parsi Marriage and Divorce Act, 1936 - Sections 40; Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 34

Reported in : AIR1980Bom123

Advocate for Respondent : K.K. Vyas and;S.K. Vyas, Advs.

Madon, J.1. The question with respect to this Court's jurisdiction to entertain and try this suit filed on the Original Side has been referred to a Division Bench by a learned single Judge of this High...

Syndicate Bank Vs. East India Hotels Ltd.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 6(1) and 6(4); Presidency Small Causes Courts Act, 1882 - Sections 41

Reported in : 2005(1)BomCR514; 2005(2)MhLj363

Advocate for Respondent : S.H. Doctor, Sr. Adv., ;A.S. Doctor, ;S.C. Shah and ;Chhaya Shah Gupta, Advs., i/b., Bhasin & Co.

Devadhar J.P., J.1. This appeal arises out of the judgment and order dated 24-2-1995 wherein the preliminary issue of jurisdiction raised by the appellant defendant has been rejected by the learned Single Judge by holding that...

Gujarat State Road Transport Corporation Vs. Hussainbhai J. Saiyed

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Reported in : (2009)IILLJ43Guj

Advocate for Respondent : J.S. Brahmbhatt, Adv.

K.M. Thaker, J.1. In this petition, the petitioner, Gujarat State Road Transport Corporation (hereinafter referred to as 'the corporation') has challenged award dated May 13, 2003 passed by the Industrial Tribunal in reference (IT) No. 72/1999....

Government Pleader Vs. the Groundnut Extraction Export Development Ass ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Reported in : (1977)79BOMLR226

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Vahanvati

Madon, J.1. The petitioner has filed this application in revision purporting to do so under Section 5(2) of the Bombay Court-fees Act, 1959.2. The facts which have given rise to this application are that on December...

Commissioner of Sales Tax Vs. Bombay Film Laboratories Private Limited

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1953; Bombay Sales Tax (Amendment) Act, 1959

Reported in : [1978]41STC52(Bom)

Advocate for Respondent : V.H. Patil, Adv.

Madon, J. 1. The respondents were registered as dealer under the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1953, with effect from 10th June, 1954. They are also registered as dealers under the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959. The...

Abbashbhai K. Golwala Vs. R.G. Shah and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Indian Partnership Act, 1932 - Sections 40, 41, 42, 43 and 44; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 13

Reported in : AIR1988Bom187

Advocate for Respondent : R.A. Kapadia and;P.K. Devitre, Advs., i/b., Rustamji and Ginwala, Advs.

ORDER1. The plaintiff, the three defendants and Kantilal Ochhavlal Sheth were carrying on business in partnership in the name of M/s. Goodwill Light House on the terms and conditions recorded in the Deed of Partnership dated...

Dashrath S/O Ramkrishna Shelke Vs. the State of Maharashtra Through th ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 16; Maharashtra Civil Services Rules, 1982 - Rule 10(4)

Reported in : 1994(4)BomCR570

Advocate for Respondent : C.J. Sawant, S.C. and ;R.D. Soni, A.P.P. for respondent Nos. 1 to 4

M.S. Rane, J.1. This petition is being disposed of at the stage of admission itself on hearing the learned Counsel for both the sides and on perusal of the relevant record comprising of the pleadings i.e....

Advani Oerlikon Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Bombay Court Fees Act, 1959; Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 256(2)

Reported in : (1977)79BOMLR229; [1977]107ITR520(Bom)

Advocate for Respondent : V.H. Patil, Adv.

Madon, J.1. This is an application in revision under section 5(2) of the Bombay Court Fees, 1959. 2. The petitioners are a private limited company and carry on the business of manufacture and sale electrodes and...

Central Bank of India Vs. Elmot Engineering Co. Pvt. Ltd. and Others. ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 446

Reported in : 1992(3)BomCR309; [1994]81CompCas10(Bom); 1993(1)MhLj771

S.M. Jhunjhunuwala, J.1. The applicants have applied for leave under section 446 of the Companies Act, 1956, to continue to prosecute the Original Suit No. 7 of 1986 and Original Suit No. 507 of 1989 filed...