Advanced Search Results

Vardhman Properties Ltd. Vs. the Collector of Stamps, Govt. of Nct of ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Property

Acts : Indian Stamp Act, 1899 - Sections 13, 14, 33, 38, 38(2) and 40 - Schedule - Article 35; Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1952 - Sections 147 and 147(2); Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 105; Punjab Land Revenue Act, 1887

Reported in : AIR2007Delhi214; 140(2007)DLT354

Advocate for Respondent : Jagmohan Sabharwal, Sr. Adv., ; Zubeda Begum, ; Iram Majid

Badar Durrez Ahmed, J.1. All these petitions are directed against the notices issued under Section 40 of the Indian Stamp Act, 1899 (hereinafter referred to as a 'Stamp Act'). By virtue of these notices, deficient duty...

Surendra Pal Singh vs.uoi & Ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Rajan Sabharwal

* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:16. hJanuary , 2019 Pronounced on:11th February,2019 W.P.(C) 6222/2002 & CM No.10600/2002 SURENDRA PAL SINGH ........ Petitioner UOI & ORS. Through:... Petitioner in person....

Ansar Alam and ors. Vs. Municipal Corporation of Delhi and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Constitution

Reported in : 1998VAD(Delhi)148; 73(1998)DLT706

ORDERM.S.A. Siddiqui, J.1. On 30th June, 1989, applications were invited to fill up the posts of 60 Assistant Engineers (Civil) in the Engineering Department of the MCD. The essential qualifications for the post were a): degree...

Vidyanand & Anr. vs Union of India & Anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : MRTP

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Sabharwal

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 17347/2025 VIDYANAND & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. B.K. Agarwal, Adv.versusUNION OF INDIA & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Pritish Sabharwal, CGSC for R-1 HC Jitendra Kr....

National Assn. of Motion Pictures Exhibitors, Delhi Vs. Union of India ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Cinematograph Act, 1952; Delhi Cinematograph Rules, 1953; Union Territories (Laws) Act, 1950 - Sections 2; Punjab Cinemas Regulations Act, 1952; Constitution of India - Article 246

Reported in : ILR1983Delhi691

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Sabharwal

Sachar, J. (1) Does Delhi Administration lack competency in law to fix rates for admission to Cinematograph exhibition in Cinema houses notwithstanding the extension of the Punjab Cinemas Regulations Act, 1952 (hereinafter to be called the...

Director of Income-tax Vs. Galileo International Inc.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 5(2), 9(1), 234A and 234B

Reported in : [2009]180TAXMAN357(Delhi)

Advocate for Respondent : Dinesh Vyas, ; F.V. Irani, ; Satyen Sethi and ;

A.K. Sikri, J.1. Galileo International Inc. Ltd. ('respondent herein') is a company incorporated under the laws of US. It is thus a resident of USA. It carries on the business of maintaining and operating the system...

Commissioner of Income Tax-Xiv Vs. Vivek Aggarwal

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

$~4-10 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:09. h February, 2015 + + + + + + + ITA662014 ITA672014 ITA682014 ITA692014 ITA752014 ITA762014 ITA772014 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-XIV ..... Appellant...

Shiv Mandir Jeernodhan Sanathan Sabha (Regd.) Through Its General Secr ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Civil

Acts : Delhi Development Act - Sections 11A, 11A(2), 11A(3) and 44; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 119(2005)DLT444

Advocate for Respondent : J.M. Sabharwal, Sr. Adv. and ; Pawan Mathur, Adv.

S. Ravindra Bhat, J.1. Issue Rule. With consent of parties, the matter was finally heard.2. This petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution, challenges an action of the Delhi Development Authority, (DDA), by its letter dated...

Union of India Vs. Yogender Pal Singh

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Delhi Police Act, 1978 - Sections 149; Punjab Police Rules, 1934 - Rule 12.14 and 12.15

Reported in : 26(1984)DLT263

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Sital A. K. Dar

Charanjit Talwar, J.(1) This is an appeal under clause of the Letters Patent of Punjab High Court as applicable to this Court, by the Union of India challenging, the judgment of a learned Single Judge directing...

M. Bassi Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : ServiceConstitution

Acts : Delhi Administration Seniority Rules, 1965 - Rule 7

Reported in : ILR1985Delhi375; 1985LabIC526

Sachar, J.(1) This petition challenges the seniority list of the Assistant Labour Commissioners of the Labour Department issued by Delhi Administration on 8-5-1981. By the impugned list respondent No. 4 is shown as senior to the...