Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: mr s s dalal · Page 1 of about 46 results (0.124 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Nov 12 1973

Matter of the Contempt of Court Vs. D.B. Vohra and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Nov-12-1973

Subject : Contempt of Court

Acts : Contempt of Court Act, 1971 - Sections 10 and 15

Reported in : ILR1974Delhi466

S.N. Andley, C.J. (1) Certain incidents happened in the Court of Mr. Ravi Kumar, Subordinate Judge 1st Class, Delhi, on August 17, 1973 involving his reader (Chander Mohan), D. B, Vohra, Bishan Dayal Gupta, Advocates and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 26 1999

Sita Ram Vs. Union of India

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-26-1999

Subject : Property

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections, 4 and 23(1-A)

Reported in : 1999IVAD(Delhi)503; 79(1999)DLT10; 1999(50)DRJ326

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. S.S. Dalal, Adv.

Usha Mehra, J. 1. A notification under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act (hereinafter called the Act) was issued on 27th January, 1984 in order to acquire land situated in Villages Amberhai, Matiala, Palam, Togan...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 28 1999

Kartar Singh and ors. Vs. Union of India

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-28-1999

Subject : Property

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 23(1)

Reported in : 1999IVAD(Delhi)587; 80(1999)DLT477

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. S.S. Dalal, Adv.

ORDERUsha Mehra, J.1. Notification under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act (in short the Act) was published on 12th December, 1972. The Land Acquisition Collector (in short the LAC) classified the land of the appellant...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Oct 05 2013

Shiv Kumar and Others Vs. State of Haryana and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Oct-05-2013

Subject : Land Acquisition

CWP No.11477 of 1991 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.11477 of 1991 Reserved on:19. 09.2013. Date of Decision:05. 10.2013 Shiv Kumar and others ....Petitioners. Versus State of Haryana and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 06 2012

The Shahabad Cooperative Sugar Mills Ltd. Shahabad Vs. the State of Ha ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Dec-06-2012

Subject : Land Acquisition

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.5983 of 2009 (O&M) Date of Decision: December 06, 2012 The Shahabad Cooperative Sugar Mills Ltd., Shahabad Markanda, District Kurukshetra ...Petitioner Versus The...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 22 2007

H.S. Pannu Vs. Govt. of N.C.T. of Delhi and anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Oct-22-2007

Subject : ElectricityCriminal

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 21; Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 39, 44, 135 to 139, 151, 152, 154, 154(3) and 154(5); Electricity Rules, 2003; Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 - Sections 20(8); Maharastra Control of Organized Crimes Act, 1999; Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 21(3), 21(4) and 37; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) (Cr.PC), 1973 - Sections 82, 83, 262 to 265, 397, 401, 437, 437(3), 438, 438(1), 438(2), 439, 446A, 497 and 498; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 409 and 420

Reported in : 2007(99)DRJ366

Advocate for Respondent : M.S. Vinaik, Adv. for BSES RPL,; N.K. Kaul, Sr. Adv. and; S

S. Ravindra Bhat, J.1. These revision proceedings under Sections 397/401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure Code (Cr.PC) involve decision of common questions. Hence with consent of counsel, they were heard together.2. The Petitioners purport to...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 17 2012

Present: Mr. Ajay JaIn Advocate Vs. State of Haryana and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Dec-17-2012

Subject : Land Acquisition

CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.3887 OF 201.:{ 1 }: IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH DATE OF DECISION: DECEMBER 17 2012 Partap Singh Ranga .....Petitioner VERSUS State of Haryana and others ....Respondents CORAM:-...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 04 2012

“that the Petitioner Has Never Applied for Requisite Change of Vs. D ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Dec-04-2012

Subject : Land Acquisition

CWP No.4349 of 2012 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ***** CWP No.4349 of 2012 Date of decision :4. 12.2012 Dharamvir Malik ..........Petitioner versus State of Haryana and others .......Respondents CORAM:...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 15 2014

Present: Mr. S.S.Dalal Advocate for Vs. State of Haryana and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jul-15-2014

Subject : Land Acquisition

CWP No.12754 of 2014 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.12754 of 2014 Date of Decision: 15.07.2014 Anil Kumar and others ..Petitioner(s) Versus State of Haryana and others ..Respondent(s) CORAM:...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 19 2018

Union of India Anr. Vs.ravinder Kumar Gupta & Ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Dec-19-2018

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Sanath Kumar, Mr. Manvi Gola, Mr. Vinayak

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: November 19, 2018 Pronounced on: December 19, 2018 + W.P.(C) 5835/1999 UNION OF INDIA ANR. ...Petitioners Through: Mr. P.P. Malhotra, Senior Advocate with Mr....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial