Advanced Search Results

A. Subramanian Vs. Punjab National Bank Represented by Its Chairman-cu ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Service

Reported in : (1998)2MLJ233

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. S. Jayaraman

AR. Lakshmanan, J.1. After hearing the learned Counsel for the appellant, the writ appeal is admitted. By consent of both parties, the writ appeal is taken up for final hearing.2. The writ appeal is directed against...

R. Varadachari Vs. the Management of the Press Trust of India, Parliam ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : (2003)IILLJ420Mad

Advocate for Respondent : S. Jayaraman, Adv. for RR1 and 2

ORDERE. Padmanabhan, J.1. In W.P. No. 10076 of 1998, the petitioner, R. Varadachari has prayed for the issue of a writ of certiorari to call for the records in I.D. No. 53/91 dated 12.3.97 on the...

S. Balasubramanian rep. by Power of Attorney Agent Gomathinayagam Vs. ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Property

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - sections 4(1), 6(1), 23, 28 and 34; Interest Act, 1978 - Sections 1

Reported in : (2001)2MLJ529; 2001(2)CTC519

ORDERP. Shanmugam, J.1. The claimant as well as the Land Acquisition Officer, aggrieved by the common judgment rendered under the Land Acquisition Act, have filed the above appeals.2. An extent of 11.38.0 hectares of dry lauds...

C.R. Mugundan and ors. Vs. Director General (Member Secretary), Indian ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : (1996)ILLJ849Mad; (1996)IMLJ523

Advocate for Respondent : S. Jayaraman, Adv.

ORDERAr. Lakshmanan, J.1. The prayer in W.P, No. 18969 of 1994 is to issue a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to regularise the services of the petitioners in their respective categories as they are working...

Madura Coats Ltd. and Millennium Mills Vs. Devadoss Sathraj

Court : Chennai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 115

Reported in : (2003)IIILLJ1132Mad; (2003)3MLJ261

Advocate for Respondent : K. Srinivasan, Adv.

ORDERS. Ashok Kumar, J.1. The petitioners are the defendants in O.S. No. 109 of 2002. The respondent/plaintiff filed the suit against the petitioners/defendants for a declaration that the transfer order dated 27.12.2001 issued by the first...

Management of Craigmore Estate, Kullakamby Post, Nilgiris Dist. Vs. La ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 11A

Reported in : (1981)IILLJ23Mad

1. Certain disciplinary proceedings were taken by the petitioner against the second respondent which culminated in an order of dismissal against the second respondent. The second respondent agitated the mater further but way of industrial dispute...

State Bank of Travancore Vs. Dy. Commissioner of Labour, Coimbatore an ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Tamil Nadu Shops and Establishments Act, 1947 - Sections 41, 41(1) and 41(2)

Reported in : (1981)ILLJ393Mad

ORDER1. The second respondent was employed as a Head Cashier in the Nagercoil branch of the petitioner at the relevant point of time. On 11th May, 1976, the petitioner issued a memo to the second respondent,...

Provisional Liquidator, Ramakrishna Industries (Pvt.) Ltd. and Others ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Reported in : (1992)IILLJ797Mad

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. S. Jayaraman

Nainar Sundaram, Ag. C.J. 1. Respondents 8, 2 and 3 in W.P. No. 3035 of 1988 are the appellants in this writ appeal. Petitioners 1 to 5 in the writ petition are respondents 1 to 5...

The Workmen of India Cements Limited, Reptd. by the Secretary, Sankari ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Reported in : (1988)2MLJ413

ORDERS.A. Kader, J.1. This writ petition has been filed by the Labour Union of India Cements Limited, Sankari for the issuance of a Writ of certiorari quashing the award dt.31-5-1982 passed by the first respondent-Presiding Officer,...

P. Periasamy, S/O Ponnusamy, Cuddalore Vs. the General Manager (Operat ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Service

Reported in : (2002)IIILLJ701Mad

Advocate for Respondent : S. Jayaraman, Adv.

ORDER1. By consent the main writ petition itself was taken up and arguments heard.2. The facts leading to the filing of the writ petition may be summarised as follows:The writ petitioner was working as a Conductor...