Advanced Search Results

Anil Kaura @ Sachin vs.the State

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Amit Ahlawat, Mr. Ramesh Gupta, Mr. Bharat Sharma, Mr. Kapil Tanwar

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + BAIL APPLN. 46/2019 Reserved on :23. 10.2019 Pronounced on :14.11.2019 ANIL KAURA @ SACHIN ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Sunil K. Mittal, Adv. Versus THE...

Deepak Amitabh & Ors. Vs.state & Anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Ramesh Gupta, Mr. Rajinder Singh, Ms. Nirpreet Kaur, Mr. Digvijay Singh, Mr. Ajay P. Tushir

$~1 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 4556/2019 Date of decision:19. 09.2019 DEEPAK AMITABH & ORS. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Sidharth Luthra, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Ravi Kishore, Adv. with...

C.S. Agarwal and anr. Vs. State and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 420, 406, 120-B; Letter Patent Act - clause 10; Government of India Act - Sections 107, 108; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 154, 173, 482

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. K.T.S. Tulsi; Mr. Ramesh Gupta; Mr. Rajinder Singh; Mr. Gaurav M. Librahem; Mr. Lalit Choudhary; Mr. Ranjit Kapoor, Advs.

1. C.S. Agarwal, the appellant in LPA No.819 of 2010, had filed Writ Petition (Crl.) No.57 of 2010 invoking the jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482...

Ramesh Sharma vs.jagat Singh Nagar & Ors

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Ramesh Gupta, Mr. Arjun Dewan, Mr. Uday Bedi, Mr. Amit Sharma, Ms. Meenakshi Dahiya

$~8 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:08. h October, 2018 + CRL.M.C. 3200/2015 RAMESH SHARMA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. B.S. Joon, Mr. Karan Chaudhary, Mr.Neeraj Balhara and Ms. Akriti Mishra, Advocates...

D R I Vs. Rajesh Sharma

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Ramesh Gupta, Mr. Janendra Kumar Chumbak

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: March 24, 2015 + CRL.M.C. 5222/2013 & Crl.M.A.No.4343/2015 DRI Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Amish Aggarwala & Mr. Satish Aggarwala, Advocates versus RAJESH SHARMA...

M/S Virtus Dordrechit B.V. vs Vikram Bhargava (Since Deceased) & O ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Ramesh Gupta, Mr. Shailendra Singh, Mr. M. Begun, Mr. Ishaan Jain, Mr. Surya Pratap Singh, Ms. Avneet Kaur

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.A. 132/2018 M/S VIRTUS DORDRECHIT B.V. .....Appellant Through: Ms. Nandita Rao, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Sangita Bharti, Mr. Ashish Kumar, Mr. Lokesh Malik and Mr. Samarjeet...

M/S Krypton Heights Builders & Infrastructure vs.m/s Sun Control S ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Hem C. Vashisht, Mr. Rahul Malik, Mr. Ramesh Gupta

$~24 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:24. h April, 2018 + RFA7362016 & CM APPL. 27349/2017 M/S KRYPTON HEIGHTS BUILDERS & INFRASTRUCTURE ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Alok Tripathi, Advocate...

Pushkar Mal Verma Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Delivered on :05. 03.2015 CRL.A.124/2013 REKHA SHARMA ….. Appellant ….. Respondent Versus CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Appellant For...

Ajit Singh Sangwan Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Delivered on :05. 03.2015 CRL.A.124/2013 REKHA SHARMA ….. Appellant ….. Respondent Versus CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Appellant For...

Nirmal Devi Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Delivered on :05. 03.2015 CRL.A.124/2013 REKHA SHARMA ….. Appellant ….. Respondent Versus CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Appellant For...