Advanced Search Results

H. R. Chauhan Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : Trusts and Societies

Acts : The Himachal Pradesh Cooperative Societies Act 1968 - Section 67

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Ram Murti Bisht; Mr. Vinod Thakur; Mr. Raman Sethi, Advs.

1. Petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs:- (a) Quash the impugned order Annexure A-1 issued arbitrarily, malafidely and illegally by the respondents; (b) Direct the respondents to permit the applicant to continue in the post...

Chanan Vs. Hari Ram and anr.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : PropertyCivil

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Raman Sethi

Kuldip Singh, J.1. This appeal has been directed against judgement, decree dated 17.9.1997 passed by learned District Judge, Solan camp at Nalagarh, in Civil Appeal No. 21-NL/13 of 1994, affirming the judgement, decree dated 20.1.1994, passed...

In Re: Gontermann-piepers (India) Ltd.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : SICA

Acts : Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 - Sections 15, 22, 22(1) and 81(1A); ;Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 100 to 103 and 391 to 394

Reported in : [2005]57SCL225(HP)

Lokeshwar Singh Panta, J.1. This petition under Sections 391 to 394 read with Section 81 (1 A) and Sections 100 to 103 of the Companies Act, 1956 has been filed by Gontermann-Piepers (India) Limited with its...

Hans Raj and Others Vs. Ran Singh

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Raman Sethi

RAJIV SHARMA, J. 1. This regular second appeal is directed against the judgment and decree passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Solan on 23.3.2002 in Civil Appeal No.51-S/13 of 2001. 2. Material facts necessary for...

Gountermann Peipers (India) Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 81(1A), 100 to 103, 391 to 394 and 443; ;Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 - Sections 15, 16, 17, 22, 22(1) and 25; ;Karnataka Rent Control Act, 1961 - Sections 21(1) and 50(1)

Reported in : [2005]126CompCas489(HP)

Advocate for Respondent : N.K. Thakur, Adv. for Respondent No. 1,; R.M. Suri,; Roh

V.K. Gupta C.J.1. This appeal under Section 391(7) of the Companies Act, 1956, is directed against the judgment dated June 10, 2004, passed by a learned single judge of this court in Company Petition No. 13...

P.L. Gupta Vs. H.P.S.E.B and anr.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Respondent : Mrs. Anjula Khajuria, Adv.

1. Since common questions of law and facts are involved in all these petitions, the same were taken up together for hearing and are being disposed of by a common judgment. However, in order to maintain...