Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: mr r s murthy · Page 1 of about 17 results (0.177 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Mar 16 2001

K. Gnanamba Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-16-2001

Subject : Service

Acts : Railway Service (Pension) Rules, 1993 - Rules 20, 31 and 107; Constitution of India - Article 309

Reported in : 2001(2)ALD699

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. R.S. Murthy, Adv.

ORDERS.B. Sinha, CJ1. This writ petition has been filed by the wife of K. Srinivasan since deceased claiming pensionary benefits. The petitioner's husband joined as casual labourer and worked in that capacity in the construction wing...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 15 1995

Union of India (Uoi), Ministry of Home Affairs, Rep. by the Secretary ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Sep-15-1995

Subject : Service

Acts : Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972 - Rule 48

Reported in : 1995(3)ALT436

Advocate for Respondent : R.S. Murthy, Adv. and ;K. Rajanna, Addl. S.C. in W.A. 158/93 and ;Y. Suryanarayana, Adv. in W.A. 44/93

Lingaraja Rath, J.1. Both these appeals arise out of the same judgment respectively preferred by the respondent and the appellants in W.P. No. 6987 of 1989 and hence are disposed of by this common judgment. For...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 17 1997

Govt. of India, Ministry of Home Affairs, Rep. by Its Deputy Secretary ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Sep-17-1997

Subject : Civil

Acts : Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act, 1976 - Sections 4, 5, 6 and 10

Reported in : 1997(5)ALT820

Advocate for Respondent : R. Dayananda Reddy, Adv. for Respondent No. 1 and ;C. Trivikrama Rao, Adv. for Respondent No. 2

Lingaraja Rath, J.1. The Central Government is in appeal against the order of the learned single Judge holding that a notice to be required to be given to show cause prior to any order is passed...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Sep 02 1998

M.V.V. Satyanarayana Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Sep-02-1998

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 5, 11 and 12(2); Limitation Act, 1962 - Schedule - Article 137; Limitation (Amendment) Act, 1963 - Schedule - Articles 3 and 137; Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 21 and 43(1)

Reported in : 1998(5)ALD582; 1998(5)ALT262

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. R.S. Murthy, SC for the Railways

1. The short but interesting question involved in this application is whether the application under Section 11 of theArbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short, 'the Arbitration Act' is barred by limitation?2. The applicant was entrusted...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 19 1998

K. Venkateswara Rao Vs. T. Seshachalapathi and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Feb-19-1998

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 29 and 30; Interest Act, 1978

Reported in : 1998(2)ALT610; 1998(2)ARBLR87(AP)

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. R.S. Murthy, ;SC for South Central Railway

ORDERMotilal B. Naik, J.1. All these three matters arise out of a common order passed by the III Additional Judge, City Civil Court, Secunderabad in O.S.No.121 of 1992 and O.P.No.84 of 1992 dated 23-7-1993,2. O.S.No.121 of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 30 1999

M.V.V. Satyanarayana, Secunderabad Vs. Union of India

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-30-1999

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 11(6)

Reported in : 1999(3)ALD405; 1999(4)ALT761

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. R.S. Murthy, Adv.

ORDER1. These are the applications for appointment of Sole Arbitrator for adjudicating the disputes that have arisen between the parties to these petitions.2. It is common ground that the petitioner has entered into an agreement with...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 30 1999

K. Pothuraju @ Kalyanam Vs. Government of Andhra Pradesh, Revenue Depa ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-30-1999

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 2(2), 96 and 144 - Order 22, Rule 3; Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 18, 23, 26, 53 and 54; Andhra Pradesh Revenue Recovery Act - Sections 52; Civil Rules of Practice - Order V; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 21, 226 and 300-A

Reported in : 1999(3)ALD473; 1999(3)ALT366

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. R.S. Murthy, Government Pleader for Revenue

ORDERVaman Rao, J. 1. These writ petitions have been filed challenging the order passed by the Court of Senior Civil Judge, Anakapalli in a petition filed under Section 144 of the Civil Procedure Code (for short...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 28 1997

K. Gundacchar Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Nov-28-1997

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Andhra Pradesh Education Act, 1982 - Sections 78-AB; Andhra Pradesh Aided Degree, Oriental and Degree Colleges Staff Pension Rules, 1993 - Rule 2; Constitution of India - Article 14; Andhra Pradesh Revised Pension Rules, 1980; Andhra Pradesh Teachers Contributory Provident Fund-cum-Pension and Gratuity Rules, 1961; Andhra Pradesh Liberalised Pension Rules, 1961; Andhra Pradesh Education (Amendment) Act, 1993; Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972; Fundamental Rules - Rule 56; Hyderabad Civil Services Rules - Rule 231; Andhra Pradesh Ordinance, 1984; Andhra Pradesh Act, 1985 - Sections 4(1); Rajasthan Service Rules, 1951 - Rules 7(24), 250C, 256AB and 268-H;

Reported in : 1998(3)ALD196

Advocate for Respondent : Government Pleader for Higher Education, ;Mr. R.S. Murthy, SC for Central Government

ORDER1. All the three writ petitions raise common questions of law and hence they are disposed of by a common order.2. In these writ petitions, constitutional validity of Section 78-B(i) of A.P. Education Act, 1982 and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 31 2001

Jagadish and Kamala Mittal Museum of Indian Arts Vs. Secretary, Minist ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-31-2001

Subject : Trusts and Societies

Acts : Foreign Contributions (Regulation) Act, 1976 - Sections 3, 4, 5, 6-A, 11, 12, 14 and 22 to 25-A; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973

Reported in : 2001(3)ALD799

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. R.S. Murthy, ;SC for Central Government

ORDERElipe Dharma Rao, J 1. Jagdishand Kamala Mittal Museum of Indian Arts, represented by its Trustee Secretary filed this writ petition to issue a writ of certiorari or any other order or writ quashing the impugned...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 13 1998

M.V.V. Satyanarayana Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jul-13-1998

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 8

Reported in : 1998(5)ALD131; 1998(5)ALT132

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. R.S. Murthy, SC for Railways

1. This is an application for appointment of a sole arbitrator for adjudicating the disputes that have arisen between the applicant and the respondents. 2. It is an admitted fact that, for the construction of Type...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial