Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: mr r n roy · Page 1 of about 9 results (0.194 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jul 22 2008

Sadanand Chatterjee Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Jul-22-2008

Subject : Property

Reported in : [2008(4)JCR110(Jhr)]

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. R.N. Roy

ORDERR.K. Merathia, J.1. Mr. Sunil Kumar Sinha, appearing for the petitioner, submitted that petitioner has challenged the notice dated 10.6.2008 (Annexure 2) issued to the petitioner for removing alleged encroachment from the Railway land to the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 21 1987

Hindustan Cables Ltd. Vs. Collector of C. Ex.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on : Aug-21-1987

Subject : MRTP

Reported in : (1989)(42)ELT60TriDel

1. This appeal dated 2-5-1983 is filed by M/s. Hindustan Cables Ltd. against the Order No. 97(27A)81-Collr-7/83 dated 2-2-1983.2. The learned Counsel for M/s. Hindustan Cables, Mr. R.N. Roy Choudhry was asked how M/s. Hindustan Cables...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 06 2013

Parmeshwar Dayal Vs. the State of Jharkhand and ors

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Mar-06-2013

Subject : Arbitration

INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI L.P.A.No.22of2013 ParmeshwarDayal ......Appellant Versus TheStateofJharkhandandors......Respondents CORAM:HONBLETHECHIEFJUSTICE HONBLEMRSJUSTICEJAYAROY .... FortheAppellant :Mr.BishambharShastri,Adv. FortheRespondents :Mr.R.N.Roy,G.P .III& Mr.A.K.Yadav,Adv. Dated6 th March,2013 ByCourt This Letters Patent Appeal has been preferred againsttheinterimorderand,therefore,itisnotmaintainable. TheLettersPatentAppealisdismissed,asnotmaintainable. (PrakashTatia,C.J.) (JayaRoy,J) G.Jha/

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jul 29 2013

Anil Kumar Dhosia Vs. Union of India and ors

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Jul-29-2013

Subject : Education

INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI CivilReviewNo.55of2011 AnilKumarDhosia ....Petitioner Versus UnionofIndiaandors. .....Opp.Parties CORAM:HONBLETHECHIEFJUSTICE HONBLEMR.JUSTICED.N.PATEL .... ForthePetitioner :M/sM.M.Pal,Sr.Adv.&S.C.Roy,Adv. FortheOpp.parties :Mr.R.N.Roy,Adv. Orderno.4 Dated29th July,2013 1. The petitioner's contention is that his writ petition was dismissedvideorderdated3rd February,2011,onthegroundthat thepetitionerdidnotrequestforremedicaltestwhereaspetitioner, infact,submittedhisrepresentationforremedicaltestalongwith others.2. Learned counsel for the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 21 2016

Majidan Bibi and Anr Vs. Union of India Through General Manager South ...

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Apr-21-2016

Subject : Land Acquisition

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI M.A.No.391 of 2014 --- 1. Majidan Bibi, W/o Sk. Dilkhus @ Sk. Dilkhus Alam.2. Sk. Dilkhus @ Sk. Dilkhus Alam. Both r/o Zakir Nagar, P.O. Azadnagar, Mango, P.S....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 26 2013

Smt Kalyani Devi Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Jul-26-2013

Subject : Education

INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI Cont.Case(Civil)No.895of2012 Smt.KalyaniDevi Petitioner Versus TheStateofJharkhand&others .........OppositeParties. CORAM: HONBLEMR.JUSTICED.N.PATEL ForthePetitioner:Mr.O.P .Singh,Advocate FortheState:Mr.R.N.Roy,G.P.III 09/Dated:26 th July,2013 1. Counselfortheapplicantfairlysubmitted,uponinstructionsfromhis client,thatfornoncomplianceoftheorder,againstwhichthiscontempt petitionhasbeenpreferred,hasnowbeencompliedwithbytheopposite parties,atbelatedstage.2. In view of this submission, this contempt petition is, hereby, dismissed. (D.N.Patel,J) VK/

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 19 1993

Delhi Bottling Co. Pvt. Ltd. Vs. A.N. Tripathi and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-19-1993

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 33(2)

Reported in : 51(1993)DLT240; (1994)ILLJ1207Del

Santosh Duggal, J. (1) The question involved in this writ petition,filed by the Management, namely, M/s. Delhi Bottling Co. (P) Ltd. under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution, falls in a very narrow compass, namely,as to whether...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 24 1956

Nand Kishore Prasad Vs. the State of Bihar and anr. Overruled

Court : Patna

Decided on : Aug-24-1956

Subject : Service Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 311

JUDGMENT1. In this case the petitioner Nand Kishore Prasad hag applied to the High Court under Article 236 of the Constitution for grant of a writ in the nature of certiorari to quash order No. 1056...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 26 2013

Yatindra Kumar Das and anr Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Jul-26-2013

Subject : Education

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(Cr.)No. 126 of 2010 Yatindra Kumar Das & Anr .........Petitioners Vs. The State of Jharkhand and others........Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR For the Petitioners: Mr. R....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial