Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: mr r muthukumaraswamy · Page 1 of about 95 results (0.061 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Feb 27 2012

P.Sundararajan Vs. the Registrar [Vigilance]

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Feb-27-2012

Subject : Right to Information

Advocate for Respondent : Mr.R.Muthukumaraswamy, Adv.

 Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a writ of mandamus directing the respondent to commence a statutory investigation by registering an FIR on his complaint dated 18.08.2011 and submit...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 29 2010

Dr. Subramanian. Vs. the Administrator Cum Scheme Judge, and anr.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jul-29-2010

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. R. Muthukumaraswamy, Adv.

1. The Anbanathapuram Vahaiara Charities was established long back. There are five descendent families to the founder. A dispute arose relating to administration of the charity that led to the filing of suit in O.S. No.68/48...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 12 2011

inside Cpcl Campus Vs. Chennai Petroleum Corporation Limited

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Dec-12-2011

Subject : Company Law

Acts : Companies Act, 1956; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Section 12(3); Constitution of India - Articles 51(c), 39A

Advocate for Respondent : Mr.R.Muthukumaraswamy, Adv.

This writ petition is filed by the Chennai Petroleum Officers Association (Registered Association) to quash the notice dated 6.9.2011 issued by the respondent, namely, Chennai Petroleum Corporation Limited. 2. The case of the petitioner-association are as...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jul 04 2012

B.StalIn Vs. the Registrar

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jul-04-2012

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 226, 21; Excise Act ; Customs Act ; Companies Act - Section 10F; Income Tax Act; Reorganisation Act, 1956 - Section 51(2); General Clauses Act, 1897 - Section 21; Code of Civil Procedure(CPC). - Section 22, 23, 24, 141

Advocate for Respondent : Mr.R.Muthukumaraswamy, SC, Adv

This writ petition is preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issue of a writ of mandamus to direct the second and third respondents not to pass, number or list writ...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 30 2014

K.V.Karthalingan Vs. the Governent of Tamilnadu

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jun-30-2014

Subject : Education

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 30.06.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.NAGAMUTHU W.P.No.10668 of 2014 and M.P.No.2 of 2014 K.V.KARTHALINGAN ..Petitioner versus 1 THE GOVERNENT OF TAMILNADU REP BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 15 2016

The Registrar Judicial, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai Vs ...

Court : Chennai Madurai

Decided on : Nov-15-2016

Subject : Land Acquisition

(Prayer: Suo motu Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this court to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any order or direction in the nature of Writ directing the Respondents...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 21 2007

D. Aravinth and ors. Vs. the State of Tamil Nadu Rep. by Its Secretary ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jun-21-2007

Subject : CivilConsumer

Acts : Tamil Nadu Recognised Private Schools Regulation Act; School Education Rules; Constitution of India - Articles 21 and 41;

Reported in : AIR2007Mad300

Advocate for Respondent : M. Sekar, Spl.G.P. (E) for R2, ;J. Raja Kalifulla, GP for R1 and ;R. Muthukumaraswamy, SC for ;V.P. Sengottuvel, Adv. for R3

ORDERA.P. Shah, C.J.1. The petitioners are the students of the third respondent school. The third respondent school is a recognised private school and is under the control and supervision of the first and second respondents. The...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 06 2014

Kollidam Aaru Pathukappu Nala Sangam Vs. 1.The Union of India, Rep.by ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Aug-06-2014

Subject : Land Acquisition

Before the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court Dated :6. 08-2014 Coram The Honourable Mr.Justice V.RAMASUBRAMANIAN and The Honourable Ms.Justice V.M.VELUMANI Writ Petition (MD) No.7146 of 2014 Writ Petition (MD) No.7147 to 7157, 7767 to 7772...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 04 2016

Asset Reconstruction Company (India) Limited Vs. The Inspector General ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jan-04-2016

Subject : Land Acquisition

(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking for the relief of issuance of writ of certiorarified mandamus to call for the records of the 2nd respondent culminated in the sale...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 25 1991

The Tamil Nadu Electricity Board Vs. R. Srinivasan

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Sep-25-1991

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 2(1) and (18), 122 and 125 - Order 3, Rule 4(1) (2) and (5), 5 and 6 - Order 2, Rule 4(3); Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : AIR1992Mad40; (1991)IIMLJ635

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. M.R. Ranghavan and ;Mr. T.R. Rajagopalan Amicus Curiae, Advs.

ORDERNainar Sundaram, J.1. The writ appeal has been preferred against the order of the learned single Judge in W.P. No. 11437 of 1981. There is no gainsaying that the writ petition is one preferred under Article...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial