Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: mr r krishnaswami · Page 1 of about 51 results (0.140 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Mar 07 2012

G. Janobai Vs. V.N. Devadoss.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-07-2012

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Respondent : Mr.R. Krishnaswamy, Adv.

Appeal filed under Section 96 of the Civil Procedure Code against the judgment and decree dated 21.8.2007 in O.S.No.222 of 2004 on the file of the Additional District Court (Fast Track Court-III), Poonamallee.JUDGMENTG.M. AKBAR ALI,J.,1. Appeal...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 29 1991

M/S. Sabson (India) Pvt. Ltd., Bangalore Vs. Neyveli Lignite Corporati ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jul-29-1991

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 2, 14, 14(2), 17, 21, 30, 31, 33 and 40 ; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1906 - Sections 16

Reported in : AIR1992Mad282; (1991)IIMLJ211

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. R. Krishnaswami, Adv.

ORDER1. O.P. NO. 531 of 1987 was filed by Sabson (India) Pvt. Ltd., Bangalore against Neyveli Lignite Corporation and Mr. Justice V. V. Raghavan and Mr. M. G. Balasubramaniam (arbitrators) under Sections 14(2) and 17 of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 29 1989

S. Amudha Vs. Chairman, Neyveli Lignite Corporation

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Aug-29-1989

Subject : Constitution

Reported in : (1991)1MLJ137

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. R. Krishnaswami

Mohan, Officiating C.J.1. The short tacts leading to the writ appeal are as follows: The appellant herein in a B.Sc., Chemistry graduate of the University of Madras and she secured second class in the annual examination....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Aug 29 1989

S. Amudha Vs. Chairman, Neyveli Lignite Corporation

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Aug-29-1989

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Maternity Benefit Act, 1961 - Sections 3, 4, 5 and 6

Reported in : (1991)IILLJ234Mad; (1991)IMLJ137

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. R. Krishnaswami

1. The short facts leading to the writ appeal are as follows :The appellant herein is a B. Sc., Chemistry graduate of the University of Madras and she secured Second class in the annual examination. She...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 29 2013

M.Arumugam Vs. State of Tamil Nadu

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jan-29-2013

Subject : Land Acquisition

In the High Court of Judicature at Madras Dated:29. 01.2013 Coram The Honourable Mrs.JUSTICE CHITRA VENKATARAMAN and The Honourable Mr.JUSTICE R.KARUPPIAH Writ Petition Nos.25699, 25882, 25889, 25890, 31749, 24817 to 24820, 23753, 23754 , 25824 to...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 23 2026

Minjur Paguthi Podhu Thozhilalar Sangam Vs GOVERNMENT OF INDIA

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-23-2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 23.03.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI And W.M.P.No.11620 of 2026 1.Minjur Paguthi Podhu Thozhilalar Sangam, Rep. by its General Secretary, Athipattu Pudhu Nagar, Chennai - 120. 2.G.Arputham 3.Aaravalli ......

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 06 2002

Consolidated Agencies a Partnership Firm Rep. by Its Partner A.L. Laks ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-06-2002

Subject : CommercialContract

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 20

Reported in : AIR2002Mad396; (2002)2MLJ56

Advocate for Respondent : R. Krishnaswamy, Sr. Counsel

P.D. Dinakaran, J.1. The appeal is directed against the order dated 29.3.2001 made in Application No.3713 of 1998 in C.S.No.87 of 1998 revoking the leave granted under Clause 12 of the Letters Patent to the plaintiff/appellant...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 03 2001

Parveen Travels (P.) Ltd. Vs. Visteon Automative Systems India (P.) Lt ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Dec-03-2001

Subject : ArbitrationContract

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 9; Specific Relief Act - Sections 14, 14(1) and 41

Reported in : [2002]112CompCas630(Mad); [2003]44SCL564(Mad)

Advocate for Respondent : Krishna Srinivasan, Adv.

K. Sampath, J.1. This is an application under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, for an order of interim injunction restraining the respondent, their men, agents, etc., from cancelling the agreement with the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 15 2009

Emgeeyar Pictures Pvt. Ltd. Represented by Its Managing Director Nirma ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Sep-15-2009

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Sale of Goods Act; Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 19(4)

Reported in : (2009)8MLJ1149

Advocate for Respondent : V. Thiageswaran, Adv. for Waraon & Saikumar for R1 and ;R. Krishnaswami, Sr. Counsel for ;K. Harishankar, Adv. for R2

M. Chockalingam, J.1. These two appeals challenge a common order of the learned Single Judge of this Court made in O.A. No. 48 of 2009 in C.S. No. 1101 of 2008 and in O.A. No. 1231...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 11 1997

V. Shankar Ram Vs. Mrs. Sukanya

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-11-1997

Subject : Family

Acts : Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 5, 12 and 28; Child Marriage Restraint (Amendment) Act, 1978; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 17; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 120; Constitution of India - Article 142

Reported in : AIR1997Mad394; (1997)IIMLJ170

Advocate for Respondent : R. Krishnaswamy, Adv.

ORDERAr. Lakshmanan. J. 1. This appeal filed under Section 28 of the Hindu Marriage Act is directed against the judgment and decree dated 22-10-1991 in O.P. No. 88 of 1990 on the file of the Additional...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial