Advanced Search Results

Ritesh Kumar Vs. Smt. Chandrakanta

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Limitation

Reported in : AIR2007Raj192; RLW2007(3)Raj2465

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. R.K. Agarwal

Vineet Kothari, J.1. These two appeals were filed in this Court on 19.12.2005 without payment of any court fees. The suit of the plaintiff-respondent for cancellation of the sale deed in favour of the appellant-defendant was...

Union of India (Uoi) Vs. U.P. Asbestos Ltd.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Civil

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. R. K. Agarwal, Mr. R. K. Agrawal

Rajiv Sharma, J.1. Heard Ms. Deep Shikha, learned Counsel for the appellants and Mr. R. K. Agarwal, learned Counsel for the Respondents.2. As the common questions of facts and law are involved in the aforementioned cases,...

Mazibur Rahman Vs. Abul HussaIn and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) Sections - 245, 304, 313, 401, 401(3) and 439(4); Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections - 147, 148, 149, 302, 323, 324, 325, 341 and 342

Advocate for Respondent : D. Das and R.K. Agarwal, Advs.

I.A. Ansari, J.1. The judgment and order, dated 21.8.2003, passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge (Adhoc), Barpeta, in Sessions Case No. 138 of 2000, whereby 4 (four) accused persons, namely, Abul Hussain, Jabber Ali, Aynal...

Arun Kumar Tyagi Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 15(4) and 226

Reported in : RLW2003(1)Raj695; 2002(4)WLC158

Advocate for Respondent : A. Kasliwal,; R.K. Agarwal and; Virendra Lodha, Advs

Rathore, J.1. This petition is directed against the order dated 11.12.2001 by which the respondent Board has awarded Retail Out Let dealership of HPCL at Jaipur in favour of the respondent No. 4 Smt. Anju Kataria...

Palden Bhutia and ors. Vs. Januka Chettri and ors.

Court : Sikkim

Subject : Civil

Reported in : AIR2007Sik15

Advocate for Respondent : Shri. R. K. Agarwal

A.P. Subba, J.1. This Appeal is directed against the judgment and decree dated 24-3-2006, passed by the learned District Judge (South & West) at Namchi, in title Suit No. 9 of 2005.2. The facts of the...

MartIn and Harris Pvt. Ltd and anr. Vs. Rajendra Mehta and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : 2007(3)WLN329

R.S. Chauhan, J.1. The dispute over provisional rent under Section 7 of the Rajasthan Rent Control Act, 1950 (henceforth to be referred to as 'the Act of 1950', for short) has brought the parties before this...

Santosh Kumar Himatsingka and ors. Vs. Snowlion Automobiles Ltd. and a ...

Court : Sikkim

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 2007CriLJ2351

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. N.K.P. Sarraf

ORDERA.P. Subba, J.1. This Criminal Misc. Case filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 is directed against the order dated 21-4-2006 passed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate (East and North) at...

Evergreen Sweet House Vs. Ever Green and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Delhi Shops and Establishments Act, 1954; Trademarks Act, 1999 - Sections 2(1), 29(1) and 29(2)

Reported in : LC2009(1)14; 2008(38)PTC325(Del)

Advocate for Respondent : Ramesh Saraf, Adv. for defendant Nos. 1 to 4

S. Ravindra Bhat, J.IA 6442/20051. This order will dispose of is 6442/2005, an application for ad-interim injunction restraining the defendant from using the trademark and trading style 'EVERGREEN', or any other mark deceptively or confusingly similar...

Mahesh Agrawal Vs. Vikram Agrawal

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Arbitration

Reported in : 2007(4)ARBLR33(Raj); RLW2007(3)Raj2153

R.S. Chauhan, J.1. The dispute over the management of a hotel is the bone of contention between the parties. The appellant has challenged the Order dated 9.3.2006 passed by the District Judge, Jaipur whereby the learned...

Bhag Chand Vs. A.D.J. No. 5 and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Tenancy

Reported in : AIR2009Raj178; RLW2009(3)Raj2081

ORDERDalip Singh, J.1. The questions for consideration which have been referred to the Larger Bench for decision are as follows:(1) Whether Section 29 of the Rajasthan Rent Control Act, 2001 has its overriding effect on Section...