Advanced Search Results

Smt. Solgabai Sunil Pawar Vs. the State of Maharashtra and Another

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 21, 32 and 226; India Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 306, 323 and 330

Reported in : 1998ACJ1109; 1998BomCR(Cri)562; (1999)1BOMLR449; 1998CriLJ1505; 1998(2)MhLj410

Advocate for Respondent : R.S. Deshpande, Adv.

ORDERA.P. Shah, J.1. The petitioner Solgabai Sunil Pawar has filed this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for holding an enquiry in respect of the death of the petitioner's husband Sunil Pawar in...

Smt. Sunita Hanumant Fulore Vs. the State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords Bootleggers, Drug Offenders and Dangerous Persons Act, 1981 - Sections 3, 3(1), 8 and 8(2); Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords Bootleggers, Drug Offenders and Dangerous Persons Act, 1996; Constitution of India - Articel 226; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 147, 148, 149, 324, 325, 326, 452, 504 and 506(2)

Reported in : 2001ALLMR(Cri)794; 2001BomCR(Cri)753; (2001)3BOMLR241; 2001CriLJ2472

Advocate for Respondent : Miss. A.K. Kamat, A.P.P.

Vishnu Sahai, J. 1. Through this Writ Petition, preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner, who describes herself as the wife of the detenu Hanumant Kathod Fulore, has impugned the order dated...

Naseem Riyaz Khalifa Vs. Shafupta Naseem Khalifa and Another

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Education

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Pitale

Oral Judgment: 1 Rule. With the consent of the Learned Counsel for the parties made returnable forthwith and heard. 2 The Writ Jurisdiction of this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is invoked...

The State of Maharashtra Through the Addl. Chief Secretary to Governme ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2006(1)ALLMR450; 2006(1)BomCR117; (2005)107BOMLR1111; 2006(2)MhLj538

Advocate for Respondent : A.R. Pitale, Adv.

D.B. Bhosale, J.1. Heard learned Counsel for the parties.2. Rule, returnable forthwith. Mr. Pitale, learned Counsel waives service for the respondents. By consent of the parties the matter is taken up for final hearing.3. These writ...

Nandlal Wasudeo Badwaik Vs. Lata Nandlal Badwaik and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Manish Pitale

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.24 OF2014(@SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRL.) No.8852 of 2008) NANDLAL WASUDEO BADWAIK ..... APPELLANT VERSUS LATA NANDLAL BADWAIK & ANR. ..... RESPONDENTS JUDGMENT CHANDRAMAULI KR....