Advanced Search Results
Surendra Shankar Walkar Vs. Laxman Shankar Waikar and ors.
Mumbai
Dec-02-1958
Arbitration
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 3, Rule 4
(1959)61BOMLR757
K.R. Bengeri and ;G.R. Madbhavi, Advs.
ORDER1. The relevant facts out of which this civil revision application and the civil application arise are briefly as follows. The applicant and opponent No. 1 are brothers. Opponents Nos. 2 and 3 are the sons...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKesu Pandu Yelawande Vs. Indubai Ankush Khandagale
Mumbai
Mar-11-1970
Family
(1970)72BOMLR471; 1970MhLJ751
Mr. Pendse
Nain, J.1. This is an appeal against the appellate judgment dated January 25, 1965 of the learned District Judge, Ahmednagar. The appeal has been filed by the original defendants Nos. 1 and 6. Respondent No. 1...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShree Ram Mills Limited Vs. Rashtriya Mill Mazdoor Sangh
Mumbai
Jun-27-2014
Labour and Industrial
Mr. Pendse
1. The Petitioner challenges the order passed by the Industrial Court, Mumbai allowing the complaint filed by the Respondent directing the Petitioner to enter the names of the concerned workmen on the muster roll and provide...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Vishwanath Revansiddappa Lingshetti Vs. Shivshankar Basappa Ningshetti
Mumbai
Apr-11-1970
Civil
(1972)74BOMLR714
Mr. Pendse
Nain, J.1. In these three appeals the parties coming in appeal are claiming certain amounts of interest in the settlement of partnership accounts. The interest is either claimed on debit entries made in the personal accounts...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe State of Maharashtra Vs. Ramchandra Vasudeo Deshpande
Mumbai
Mar-14-1973
Criminal
(1974)76BOMLR249
Bhole, J.1. This is an appeal by the State against the order of acquittal passed by the learned Special Judge, Jalgaon, in a case where the three accused were acquitted of the offence punishable under Sections...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of Maharashtra Vs. Kamalakar Nandram Bhavsar and ors.
Mumbai
Oct-31-2002
Criminal
Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 32; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 231, 232, 233 and 294; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 306 and 498A
I(2003)DMC358
V.T. Tulpule, Sr. Adv. and ;C.K. Pendse, Adv.
D.G. Deshpande, J.1. This is an appeal against the acquittal filed by the State. All the accused - respondents were prosecuted for offence under Sections 306 read with 34, 498 and 498A of the Indian Penal...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSundrabai Ramchandra Rabade and anr. Vs. Anandrao Haribhau Rabade and ...
Mumbai
Jul-03-1972
PropertyCivil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 47 - Order 21, Rules 66 (2) and 90; Limitation Act, 1963 - Schedule - Articles 127 and 137
AIR1973Bom301; (1973)75BOMLR198
J.R. Lalit, Adv. for ;U. Lalit, Adv.
Tulzapurkar, J. 1. This appeal in execution proceedings raises an interesting question as to whether if no notice under Order 21 Rule 66 (2) of the Code of Civil Procedure is served on the judgment-debtor, are...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSayyed Hasan Sayyed Mahamad Idrus and ors. Vs. Sayyad Mazarulhakka Say ...
Mumbai
Aug-11-1975
PropertyCivil
Bombay Court Fees Act, 1959 - Sections 6; Court Fees Act, 1870 - Sections 7
AIR1976Bom251; 1976MhLJ101
M.L. Pendse, Adv.
ORDER1. These two revision applications involve the question of computation of Court-fee payable under Section 6(v) of the Bombay Court-fees Act, 1959, in respect of Bagayat land with residential houses situated thereon. Both the applications can...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGanesh Shankar Kulkarni Vs. Janakibai Krishnaji Kulkarni and ors.
Mumbai
Sep-01-1976
PropertyLimitation
Limitation Act, 1908 - Sections 2(7), 4, 14 and 14(2); Transfer of Property Act - Sections 41; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 80 - Order 34, Rules 1 and 4
AIR1977Bom269
V.V. Albal, ;M.L. Pendse and ;H.D. Gole, Advs.
Aggarwal, J.1. This second appeal against the decision of the learned District Judge, Kolhapur, has been referred to Division Bench by a learned Single Judge as, in his opinion, it involves important questions, particularly as regards...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAvadhoot L. Shilotri Vs. Securities and Exchange Board of India
SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT
May-21-2004
MRTP
2. Avadhoot Shilotri is the appellant in this appeal (hereinafter referred to as the "appellant"). The appellant challenges the order passed by the respondent Securities & Exchange Board of India dated 2.1.2004.3. The operative portion of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- Next ›
- Last »