Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: mr pendse · Page 1 of about 56 results (0.091 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Dec 02 1958

Surendra Shankar Walkar Vs. Laxman Shankar Waikar and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Dec-02-1958

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 3, Rule 4

Reported in : (1959)61BOMLR757

Advocate for Respondent : K.R. Bengeri and ;G.R. Madbhavi, Advs.

ORDER1. The relevant facts out of which this civil revision application and the civil application arise are briefly as follows. The applicant and opponent No. 1 are brothers. Opponents Nos. 2 and 3 are the sons...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 11 1970

Kesu Pandu Yelawande Vs. Indubai Ankush Khandagale

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-11-1970

Subject : Family

Reported in : (1970)72BOMLR471; 1970MhLJ751

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Pendse

Nain, J.1. This is an appeal against the appellate judgment dated January 25, 1965 of the learned District Judge, Ahmednagar. The appeal has been filed by the original defendants Nos. 1 and 6. Respondent No. 1...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 27 2014

Shree Ram Mills Limited Vs. Rashtriya Mill Mazdoor Sangh

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jun-27-2014

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Pendse

1. The Petitioner challenges the order passed by the Industrial Court, Mumbai allowing the complaint filed by the Respondent directing the Petitioner to enter the names of the concerned workmen on the muster roll and provide...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Apr 11 1970

Vishwanath Revansiddappa Lingshetti Vs. Shivshankar Basappa Ningshetti

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-11-1970

Subject : Civil

Reported in : (1972)74BOMLR714

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Pendse

Nain, J.1. In these three appeals the parties coming in appeal are claiming certain amounts of interest in the settlement of partnership accounts. The interest is either claimed on debit entries made in the personal accounts...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 14 1973

The State of Maharashtra Vs. Ramchandra Vasudeo Deshpande

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-14-1973

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : (1974)76BOMLR249

Bhole, J.1. This is an appeal by the State against the order of acquittal passed by the learned Special Judge, Jalgaon, in a case where the three accused were acquitted of the offence punishable under Sections...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 31 2002

State of Maharashtra Vs. Kamalakar Nandram Bhavsar and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Oct-31-2002

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 32; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 231, 232, 233 and 294; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 306 and 498A

Reported in : I(2003)DMC358

Advocate for Respondent : V.T. Tulpule, Sr. Adv. and ;C.K. Pendse, Adv.

D.G. Deshpande, J.1. This is an appeal against the acquittal filed by the State. All the accused - respondents were prosecuted for offence under Sections 306 read with 34, 498 and 498A of the Indian Penal...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 03 1972

Sundrabai Ramchandra Rabade and anr. Vs. Anandrao Haribhau Rabade and ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-03-1972

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 47 - Order 21, Rules 66 (2) and 90; Limitation Act, 1963 - Schedule - Articles 127 and 137

Reported in : AIR1973Bom301; (1973)75BOMLR198

Advocate for Respondent : J.R. Lalit, Adv. for ;U. Lalit, Adv.

Tulzapurkar, J. 1. This appeal in execution proceedings raises an interesting question as to whether if no notice under Order 21 Rule 66 (2) of the Code of Civil Procedure is served on the judgment-debtor, are...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 11 1975

Sayyed Hasan Sayyed Mahamad Idrus and ors. Vs. Sayyad Mazarulhakka Say ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-11-1975

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Bombay Court Fees Act, 1959 - Sections 6; Court Fees Act, 1870 - Sections 7

Reported in : AIR1976Bom251; 1976MhLJ101

Advocate for Respondent : M.L. Pendse, Adv.

ORDER1. These two revision applications involve the question of computation of Court-fee payable under Section 6(v) of the Bombay Court-fees Act, 1959, in respect of Bagayat land with residential houses situated thereon. Both the applications can...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 01 1976

Ganesh Shankar Kulkarni Vs. Janakibai Krishnaji Kulkarni and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-01-1976

Subject : PropertyLimitation

Acts : Limitation Act, 1908 - Sections 2(7), 4, 14 and 14(2); Transfer of Property Act - Sections 41; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 80 - Order 34, Rules 1 and 4

Reported in : AIR1977Bom269

Advocate for Respondent : V.V. Albal, ;M.L. Pendse and ;H.D. Gole, Advs.

Aggarwal, J.1. This second appeal against the decision of the learned District Judge, Kolhapur, has been referred to Division Bench by a learned Single Judge as, in his opinion, it involves important questions, particularly as regards...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 21 2004

Avadhoot L. Shilotri Vs. Securities and Exchange Board of India

Court : SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

Decided on : May-21-2004

Subject : MRTP

2. Avadhoot Shilotri is the appellant in this appeal (hereinafter referred to as the "appellant"). The appellant challenges the order passed by the respondent Securities & Exchange Board of India dated 2.1.2004.3. The operative portion of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial