Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: mr parmeshwar mehta · Page 1 of about 8 results (0.042 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

May 16 2006

Mehmood Ali Vs. State of Bihar and anr.

Court : Patna

Decided on : May-16-2006

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Factories Act - Sections 7A and 7A(3); Bihar Factories Rules, 1950 - Rules 63(3) and 65(3)

Advocate for Respondent : Vikas Ratan Bharti, Adv.

Aftab Alam, J.1. Heard Mr. Y.V. Giri, Senior Advocate appearing for the petitioners and Mr. Parmeshwar Mehta, A.P.P. representing the State.2. The two petitioners seek quashing of the order dated 26.04.2003 passed by the Chief Judicial...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 16 2011

Maujilal Mehta, S/O Jamun Mehta and ors. Vs. the State of Bihar

Court : Patna

Decided on : Aug-16-2011

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 147, 325, 149, 307

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Parmeshwar Mehta, Adv.

1. Heard the counsel for the appellants and the State. 2. The appellant no. 3, Khusilal Mehta, has been convicted under Section 147 of the Penal Code and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for six months...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 10 2011

Jaswant Paswan Vs. the State of Bihar

Court : Patna

Decided on : Aug-10-2011

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 395, 414, 379, 394, 392

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Parmeshwar Mehta, Adv.

1. Heard the counsel for the appellant and the State. 2. The appellant has been convicted under Section 395 of the Penal Code and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for seven years. 3. The prosecution case,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Apr 21 2011

Mahendra Mistry. Vs. State of Bihar.

Court : Patna

Decided on : Apr-21-2011

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Section 395

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Parmeshwar Mehta, Adv.

1. The appellant has been convicted for the offences under Section 395 IPC and sentenced to RI for ten years by the 2nd Additional Sessions Judge, Saharsa in S.Tr. No. 111/81/77/88 by a judgment dated 14.06.1995.2....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 14 2011

Rakesh Kumar MalhotrA. Vs. State of Bihar, and anr.

Court : Patna

Decided on : Jan-14-2011

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 420, 406

Advocate for Respondent : MR. PARMESHWAR MEHTA; MR. GAURANG CHATTERJEE, Advs.

1. Learned Counsel for the petitioner appearing in Criminal Misc. No. 38457 of 2007 is permitted to correct the complaint case number in paragraph 1 and prayer portion of the application.2. Criminal Misc. No. 38457 of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 04 2011

Godhan Ram, Son of Late Jagdeo Ram and ors. Vs. the State of Bihar

Court : Patna

Decided on : Aug-04-2011

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 147, 325; Arms Act - Section 25(1)(a); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Section 360

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Parmeshwar Mehta, Adv.

1. Heard learned counsel for the appellants and learned counsel for the State. 2. The appellant no. 1, Godhan Ram has been convicted under Section 147 I.P.C. and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for one year...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 03 2011

Dularchand Ram and ors. Vs. the State of Bihar

Court : Patna

Decided on : Aug-03-2011

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Section 304

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Parmeshwar Mehta, Adv.

1. Heard learned counsel for the appellants and learned counsel for the State. 2. The appellants have been convicted under Section 304 part II of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 03 2011

Nand Kumar Thakur Vs. the State of Bihar

Court : Patna

Decided on : Aug-03-2011

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 323, 324

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Parmeshwar Mehta, Adv.

1. On repeated calls no one appears on behalf of the appellant. 2. Mrs. Rina Sinha, Advocate appears and prays that she may be permitted to appear in this case as Amicus Curiae. 3. Prayer is...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial