Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: mr parekh · Page 1 of about 261 results (0.092 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

May 07 2012

Supreme Court Bar Association and ors. Vs. B.D. Kaushik.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : May-07-2012

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 39 Rules 1 and 2, Section 151 ; Companies Act, 1956 - Section 173(2)

Surinder Singh Nijjar|1. I.A. No.1 of 2012 has been filed by the Supreme Court Advocate-on- Record Association (SCAORA) in Civil Appeal Nos.3401 and 3402 of 2003, which were disposed of on 26th September, 2011, and form...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 02 1985

Makbool Ahmed and ors. Vs. Bhura Lal and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Apr-02-1985

Subject : Motor VehiclesCivil

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 95(1), 95(2) and 110A

Reported in : AIR1986Raj177; [1987]62CompCas447(Raj); 1985(1)WLN220

S.S. Byas, J.1. Since both these appeals under Section 110-D of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 ('the Act' hereinafter) arise out of one and the same award of the Claims Tribunal, Bhilwara dated Oct. 16, 1979,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 23 1982

Mathuralal and anr. Vs. Mandattsingh and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Feb-23-1982

Subject : Election

Reported in : 1982WLN(UC)173

M.C. Jain, J.1. The above two writ petitions arise out of the common facts. It will be proper to dispose of them together by a common order, so they are being disposed of by this common...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Sep 24 1993

Keshavji Meghaji Dediya Vs. the State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-24-1993

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Maharashtra Scheduled Articles (Display and Marking of Prices) Order, 1966; Essential Commodities Act, 1955 - Sections 7(1)

Reported in : 1994(3)BomCR640

Advocate for Respondent : Bhojne, A.P.P. for State

S.W. Puranik, J.1. Appellant stands convicted for the offence under section 7(1)(a)(ii) of the Essential Commodities Act read with Clause 3(a) of the Maharashtra Scheduled Articles (Display and Marking of Prices) Order, 1966 and sentenced to...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 06 1985

Dr. Sudhir Kumar Vs. Mohan Lal Sukhadia University or the Udaipur Univ ...

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Nov-06-1985

Subject : Service

Reported in : 1985WLN(UC)400

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Parekh

Ashok Kumar Mathur, J.1. The petitioner by this writ petition has prayed that the order Annexure-1 dated 23-1-1982 may be quashed and the respondents may be directed not to proceed according to order Annexure-1 by way...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 23 2003

Haresh K. Borisagar Vs. State of Gujarat

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Jul-23-2003

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 21; Gujarat Municipalities Act, 1963 - Sections 260

Reported in : (2003)4GLR493

Advocate for Respondent : P.K. Parekh, Adv. for Respondent No. 1 and; Government Pleader for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2-3 in Speci

ORDERH.K. Rathod, J.1. Recently, the Hon'ble Apex Court has made important observations and raised important questions relating to Article 21 of the Constitution of India in case of Kapila Hingorani v. State of Bihar reported in...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 01 2007

Atulkumar Bhagwat Prasad Bhatt Vs. State of Gujarat and anr.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Nov-01-2007

Subject : Civil

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 14; Drugs and Cosmetic Rules, 1945 - Rule 2; Gujarat Homeopathy Act, 1967; Gujarat Medical Council Act, 1967; Gujarat Medical Practitioners Act, 1963 - Sections 17(2), 17(3), 30, 30(1), 30(2), 34 and 37; Indian Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940; Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 - Sections 15(1), 15(2), 21, 21(1), 23, 25 and 27; Indian Medicine Central Council Act, 1970 - Sections 2, 2(1), 3, 14, 14(1), 14(2), 16, 17, 17(1), 17(2), 17(3), 17(4), 23(1), 28 and 29

Reported in : AIR2008Guj57; 2008GLH(1)386

Advocate for Respondent : Sunit S. Shah, G.P. and; Krunal Pandya, AGP

ORDERAkshay H. Mehta, J.1. Rule in the matters in which it is not issued. Mr. Sunit Shah, Ld. GP and Mr. Krunal Pandya, Ld. AGP waive service of rule on behalf of respondents.Since in all these...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 03 2001

Gujarat Rajya Dairy Karmacharisabha Vs. Managing Director

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : May-03-2001

Subject : Contract

Acts : Companies Act, 1956; Contract Act - Sections 23; Trade Union Act

Reported in : (2001)4GLR3492

Advocate for Respondent : S.N. Shelat, Adv. General alongwith; A.D.Oza, Ld.Govt.Pleader,;

K.M. Mehta, J.1. Gujarat Rajya Dairy Karmachari Sabha - petitioner has filed this petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, and has challenged the Circular dated 8.7.1999 passed by Gujarat Dairy Development...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 17 2005

Rajeshbhai Thakorbhai Bhatt Vs. Director of Municipalities

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Mar-17-2005

Subject : Civil

Acts : Gujarat Municipalities Act - Sections 70, 253, 258, 258(2) and 258(3); Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : (2005)3GLR2425

Advocate for Respondent : M.R. Mengdey, Ld. AGP for Respondent No. 1-2 in Special Civil Application No. 10477 of 2002,; Yatin Soni

Jayant Patel, J.1. As all the matters are interconnected on facts and as the common questions arise, they are being considered by this common judgement finally today, with the consent of the learned Counsel for the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 05 1976

Raymond Woollen Mills Ltd. Vs. Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practi ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-05-1976

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 111; Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969 - Sections 2, 5, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 12(1), 12(3), 13, 17(1), 17(2), 18, 18(1), 18(2), 19, 20, 21, 21(3), 22, 22(3), 23, 26, 26(1), 26(2), 31, 31(1), 32, 33, 33(1), 33(3), 34, 35, 37, 37(1), 37(2), 37(4), 38, 38(1), 39, 44(2), 50, 55, 66 and 66(1); Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : [1979]49CompCas686(Bom)

R.L. Aggarwal, J.1. This writ petition arises under the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969 (hereinafter refereed to as 'the MRTP Act'). The petitioner seeks withdrawal, cancellation and annulment of the Notice of Enquiry dated...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial