Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: mr palkhivala · Page 1 of about 405 results (0.074 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Apr 13 1964

Shankarlal Dhondiram Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, Bombay South

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-13-1964

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 26A, 34 and 34(1)

Reported in : [1965]56ITR435(Bom)

Advocate for Respondent : G.N. Joshi, Adv.

Y.S. Tambe, J.1. This is a reference under sub-section (I) of section 66 of the Indian Income-tax Act. The assessee before us is a Hindu undivided family known as 'Shri Shankarlal Dhondiram'. We are here concerned...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 25 1977

Commissioner of Income-tax, West Bengal-i Vs. Indian Aluminium Co. Ltd ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jan-25-1977

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 15C

Reported in : AIR1977SC1141; [1977]108ITR367(SC); (1977)4SCC598d; 1977(9)LC131(SC)

Advocate for Respondent : N.A. Palkhivala, ; A.K. Sen, ; J.B. Dadachanji, ;

P.K. Goswami, J.1. This appeal by the Commissioner, of Income-tax, West Bengal, Calcutta, on certificate is from the judgment of the Calcutta High Court, since reported in Commissioner of Income-tax, West Bengal-I v. Indian Aluminium Co....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 26 2006

Merit Enterprises Vs. Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Hyderabad

Decided on : Apr-26-2006

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2007)288ITR226(Hyd.)

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Palkhivala

1. This reference arises out of the appeal, against the assessment order passed by the DCIT, Central Circle-I, Hyderabad under Section 158BC of the Income-tax Act for the block period from 1.4.1989 to 18.11.1999, dated Nil,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jul 25 1975

Registrar of Restrictive Trade Vs. Tata Engineering and Locomotive

Court : Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission MRTPC

Decided on : Jul-25-1975

Subject : MRTP

Reported in : (1976)46CompCas470NULL

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Palkhivala

1. This is an application by the Registrar of Restrictive Trade Agreements (hereinafter for the sake of brevity referred to as "the Registrar") against Tata Engineering & Locomotive Co. Ltd., a company incorporated under the Companies...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 19 1966

Commissioner of Income-tax, Patiala and ors. Vs. Shahzada Nand and Son ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jan-19-1966

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Finance Act, 1956 - Sections 22 and 22(2); Indian Income-tax Act, 1922 - Sections 34, 34(1), 34(1)(1A), 34(1A) to 34(1D), 5(4) and 5(1); Income-tax (Amendment) Act, 1954; Income-tax (Amendement) Act, 1959 - Sections 34(4); Taxation of Income (Investigation Commission) Act, 1947; ;Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : AIR1966SC1342; [1966]60ITR392(SC); [1966]3SCR379

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Palkhivala

Subba Rao, J.1. These two appeals, one by special leave and the other by certificate, raise the question whether notice can be issued at any time for reassessment under s. 34(1)(a), as amended by the Finance...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 12 1962

S.C. Prashar, Income-tax Officer, Market Ward, Bombay and anr. Vs. Vas ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-12-1962

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 226; Income-tax Act, 1922 - Sections 23(5), 34(1), 34(2), 34(3) and 34(4); Income-tax (Amendment) Act, 1953 - Sections 31; Indian Income-tax (Amendment) Act, 1959 - Sections 4

Reported in : AIR1963SC1356; [1963]49ITR1(SC); [1964]1SCR29

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Palkhivala

S.K. Das, J. 1. This appeal has been brought to this court on a certificate of fitness granted by the High Court of Bombay. The appellants are the Union of India and the Income-tax Officer, Market...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 25 2003

A.S. Mani Vs. Union of India

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jul-25-2003

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : [2003]131TAXMAN717(Kar)

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Palkhivala

ORDERSri A.S. Mani, an expert in Marketing in the Petroleum sector is knocking the doors of this court in the light of an adverse endorsement issued by the Ministry of Finance dated 2-6-1999.2. The admitted facts...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 02 1965

Chiranjilal Tibrewala Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, Bombay City Ii

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-02-1965

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 22(2), 22(4), 23(4) and 27

Reported in : [1966]59ITR42(Bom)

Desai, J. 1. For the assessment year 1957-58, for which the relevant previous year was the S. Y. 2012 extending from the 15 November, 1955, to 2nd November, 1956, the assessee, who was a registered partnership...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 03 1965

Tribhuvandas Vallabhdas Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, Bombay South

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-03-1965

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 2(4) and 10

Reported in : [1966]61ITR518(Bom)

Advocate for Respondent : G.N. Joshi, Adv.

V.S. Desai, J.1. The question that arises for consideration on this reference is whether a certain transaction of the purchase and sale of silver entered into by the assessee was an adventure in the nature of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 23 1957

Commissioner of Income-tax, Bombay City I Vs. Chugandas and Co. (Secur ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-23-1957

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 10 and 25(3); Income Tax Act, 1918

Reported in : AIR1960Bom109; [1960]38ITR241(Bom)

Advocate for Respondent : N.A. Palkhivala, Adv.

Tendolkar, J.1. The question referred to this court upon this reference is : 'Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case interest received on securities held by the assessee formed part of the assessee's business...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial