Advanced Search Results

Dharampal Satyapal Ltd. Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Contempt of Courts

Acts : Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 - Article 12

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Atul Nanda; Mr. Neeraj Chaudhari; Mr. Khalid Arshad; Mr. Mohit Auluck, Advs.

1. On 14th March, 2011, the first date of hearing, the following order was passed:- "WP (C) No. 1651/2011 Heard Mr.Sudhir Chandra, learned senior counsel along with Mr.Manish Bishnoi, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr.Atul...

Focus Brands Trading (India) Pvt Ltd and anr.Vs Campari International ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Arbitration

Advocate for Respondent : Mr Neeraj K Kaul, Sr, Mr Darpan Wadhwa, Mr Kamal Shankar, Mr Sandeep Das , Mr Aditya Mehra. Advs.

1. Whether the Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment Yes2. To be referred to Reporters or not Yes3. Whether the judgment should be reported Yes in the Digest ?ORDER. (under Section...

Focus Brands Trading (India) Pvt Ltd and anr. Vs Campari International ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Arbitration

Advocate for Respondent : Mr Neeraj K Kaul, Sr , Mr Darpan Wadhwa, Mr Kamal Shankar, Mr Sandeep Das, Mr Aditya Mehra. Advs.

1. Whether the Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment Yes2. To be referred to Reporters or not Yes3. Whether the judgment should be reported Yes in the Digest ?ORDER. (under Section...

Hemant Baburao Patil Vs. Uoi and ors

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Acts : Commissions of Enquiry Act, 1952

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. A.S. Chandhiok; Mr.Neeraj Chaudhary; Mr.Sandeep Bajaj; Mr. Khalid Arshad; Ms.Neha Rastogi, Advs.

1. The petitioner No.1, President of National Anti Corruption Public Power, a registered association and an NGO and the association, the petitioner No.2 herein, have preferred this public interest writ petition with the following reliefs: "(a)...

All India Researchers Coordination Committee and ors. Vs. Union of Ind ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226, 14; UNIVERSITY GRANTS COMMISSION ACT (UGC) - Section 20, 20(1), 25(3), 26, 26(1)(e)(g),

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Neeraj Chaudhari; Mr. Khalid Arshad; Mr. Bhagat Singh, And Ors.

MANMOHAN, J :1. Present writ petitions have been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the constitutional validity of the Regulations dated 11th July, 2009 framed by the University Grants Commission (in short,...

All India Researchers Coordination Committee and ors. Vs. Union of Ind ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution Of India - Article 226; UNIVERSITY GRANTS COMMISSION ACT 1956 (UGC) Act, 1956 - Sections 26,26(1), 20(1),25.

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Neeraj Chaudhari; Mr. Khalid Arshad; Mr. Bhagat Singh;Mr. Amitesh Kumar; Mr. Mohinder J.S. Rupal; Mr. Sonam Gupta; Mr. B.V. Niren; Ms. Maninder Acharya.Advs

1. Whether the Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? Yes3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? YesMANMOHAN, J :1....

M/S. Jhalani Tools (India) Ltd. Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Delhi

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 136; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 6, Rule 16

Reported in : 2001IIAD(Delhi)596; 90(2001)DLT89; 2001(57)DRJ794

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Neeraj Kaul and ; Ms. Namita Sood, Advs.

ORDERA.K. Sikri, J.1. Apart from other questions, the main question which falls for determination in this writ petition is as to whether the instant writ petition is barred by rest judicator/constructive rest judicata. This and other...

Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi. Vs Central Distille ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Punjab Excise Act

Acts : Punjab Excise Act, 1914 - Rule 17-B

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Neeraj Kishan Kaul ; Mr. Jayant Nath, ; Mrs. Anjali K. Verma ; Mr. Niraj Gupta, Advs.

1. Whether Reporters of local papers may beallowed to see the judgment? No2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? Yes3. Whether the judgment should be reported in Digest? 1. These are six writ petitions...

Government of National Capitalterritory of Delhi Thorugh .Principal Se ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Punjab Excise Act

Acts : Punjab Excise Act, 1914 - Rule 17-B

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Neeraj Kishan Kaul ; Mr. Jayant Nath, ; Mrs. Anjali K. Verma ; Mr. Niraj Gupta, Advs.

1. Whether Reporters of local papers may beallowed to see the judgment? No2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? Yes3. Whether the judgment should be reported in Digest? Yes1. These are six writ petitions...

Balwant Singh and ors. Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Reported in : 2000VIIAD(Delhi)1; 2000(55)DRJ22

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Ashok Bhasin and ; Mr. Neeraj Kaul, Advs.

ORDERA.K. Sikri, J.1. There are canteens in Parliament House and Parliament House Annexe and petitioners are working in these canteens. They are the employees of these canteens on casual basis which are being run by Canteen...