Advanced Search Results

P. Seshadri Vs. S. Mangati Gopal Reddy and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Tirumala Tirupathi Devasthanam Act, 1932; Hindu Charitable and Religious Institutions Act, 1989; Constitution of India - Article 226

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Atul Pandey

J U D G M E N T1. Leave granted.2. This appeal by special leave is directed against the judgment of the High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Hyderabad rendered in Writ Petition No. 24124 of...

S. Viswanatha Reddy Vs. N. Venkateswara Reddy and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : CivilLimitation

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 115 - Order 9, Rule 13; Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 5

Reported in : 1997(6)ALT57

Advocate for Respondent : M.N. Narasimha Reddy and ;G. Ramachandra Reddy, Advs.

Motilal B. Naik, J.1. Order dated 25-1-1996 passed in LA. No. 116 of 1995 in O.S. No. 92 of 1986 on the file of learned Subordinate Judge, Cuddapah is the subject matter of controversy in this...

Rameshwar Prasad and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Representation of People Act, 1951 - Sections 30, 53, 66, 73 and 153; Government of India Act, 1915 - Sections 8(1) and 63; Government of India (Amendment) Act, 1919 - Sections 21; Government of India (Amendment) Act, 1935 - Sections 10(4), 50 and 93; Constitution of India - Articles 6(1), 13, 14, 48, 48(2), 58(2), 61, 75, 94, 102, 103(2), 131, 143, 153, 154, 155, 157, 159, 163, 163(1), 164, 164(1), 164(2), 164(4), 167, 168, 170, 172, 172(1), 174, 174(1), 174(2), 175, 176, 179, 188, 191, 192(2), 200, 212, 231, 239(2), 256, 257, 275, 277, 277a, 278, 324, 327, 329, 352 to 360, 361, 361(1), 361(2), 365(5), 371A, 371F and 371H; Constitution of India (38th Amendment) Act; Constitution of India (44th Amendment) Act; Constitution (Fifty-Second Amendment) Act, 1985; Constitution (Ninety-f

Reported in : AIR2006SC980; 2006(3)CTC209; JT2006(1)SC457; (2006)2MLJ67(SC); 2006(1)SCALE385; (2006)2SCC1

Y.K. Sabharwal, C.J.1. The challenge in these petitions is to the constitutional validity of Notification dated 23rd May, 2005 ordering dissolution of the Legislative Assembly of the State of Bihar. It is a unique case. Earlier...

Palaniammal Vs. Pappathi

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF MADRAS DATED:25. 4.2013 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.RAJASURIA S.A.Nos.745 o”471. of 2013 and M.P.No.1 of 2011 (in SA.745 of 2011) 1.Palaniammal 2.Kandaswami .. Appellants in S.A.No.745 of 2011...

Amr Dev Prabha Through Its Power of Attorney Holder Mithilesh Kumar Si ...

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Land Acquisition

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No. 3685 of 2015 AMR - DEV PRABHA, Hyderabad through its power of attorney holder Mithilesh Kumar Singh, Dhanbad ... … Petitioner Versus The Union of...

Pentakota Satyanarayana and ors. Vs. Pentakota Seetharatnam and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : CivilProperty

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 68 and 114; ;Indian Succession Act - Sections 63; ;Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act - Sections 22; ;Constitution of India - Article 136; Hindu law

Reported in : AIR2005SC4362; 2005(6)ALD35(SC); 2005(5)ALLMR(SC)1105; 2005(6)ALT50(SC); 2005(4)AWC3548(SC); 2005(5)CTC207; II(2005)DMC669SC; [2006(1)JCR283(SC)]; JT2005(12)SC258; 2005(7)S

Advocate for Respondent : P.S. Narsimha, ; Ananga Bhattacharya and ; Avijeet Kumar L

1. Leave granted.2. The above two appeals were filed against the judgment and order dated 20.06.2003 passed by the High Court of Judicature, Andhra Pradesh at Hyderabad in Appeal No. 720 of 1997 and Cross Objections,...

Pavunambal and ors. Vs. Shanmugam and ors.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Family

Acts : Hindu Succession Act 1956 - Section 15(1)(a), 6, 6(3), 8, 9, 19; Indian Evidence Act - Section 91, 92, 68, 114; Indian Succession Act - Section 59, 30

Advocate for Respondent : Mr.C.Sanjay Babu, Adv

Prayer in S.A.No.1751 of 2004: This Second Appeal is filed against the Judgment and Decree dated 25.06.2002 made in A.S.No.117 of 2001 on the file of the Learned Principal District Judge, Chengalpattu, reversing the Judgment and...

Pushpa Devi Vs. Motl Lal and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Family

Reported in : RLW2009(1)Raj322

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Narsimha

ORDERThe matter comes on the objection filed on behalf of the petitioner on 26.5.2007 objecting to paras 2 to 7 and 16 of the affidavit of Moti Lal. Thereupon the Dy. Registrar (Judl.) has directed the...

Amr Dev Prabha Through Its Power of Attorney Holder Mithilesh Kumar Si ...

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Sharad Kaushal, Mr. Ratan Kumar Singh

W. P. (C) No. 3685 of 2015 In the matter of an application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India --- AMR - DEV PRABHA, a Consortium of M/s. AMR India Ltd. and M/s Dev...

R.C. Kumar and ors. Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 173(2), 173(6), 178 and 319; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860; Evidence Act - Sections 3

Reported in : 1991CriLJ887

Advocate for Respondent : Public Prosecutor and M.N. Narasimha Reddy, Adv.

ORDER1. In this revision, the question that arises for consideration is, whether a criminal Court after taking cognizance of an offence and before any evidence is let in subsequent to such taking cognizance can proceed against...