Advanced Search Results

itc Limited Vs. Holbud Limited and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : ContractArbitration

Reported in : 1998(2)ALLMR268; (1997)99BOMLR755

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Narichania

S.S. Nijjar, J.1. The present suit has been filed by the plaintiffs against the defendants claiming a number of reliefs. It is claimed that there is no valid, binding or concluded contract in existence between the...

Rabo Bank Vs. State Bank of Hyderabad

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Education

1. By this Summons for Judgment, plaintiffs seek that the judgment be entered for the plaintiffs in this suit against the defendants for a sum of USD 1,931,627.89 as per particulars of claims with further interest...

POL India Projects Limited and Another Vs. Aurelia Reederei Eugen Frie ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Arbitration

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Andhyarujina

1. The petitioners in Arbitration Petition No.76 of 2012 which is filed under section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short the said Arbitration Act) have impugned the final arbitral award dated 15th...

M.V. sea Success I Vs. Liverpool and London Steamship Protection and I ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Admiralty Courts Act, 1861 - Sections 5; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 7, Rule 11

Reported in : 2002(2)BomCR537

Advocate for Respondent : P.S. Pratap, Adv. in Appl. No. 226/2001 in Notice of Motion No. 2455/2000 in Admiralty Suit No. 32/2000, for respondent No. 1 and ;Rahul Narichania, Adv., i/b., Mulla & Mulla in Appl. No. 739/2000

R.M. Lodha, J.1. The learned Single Judge while dismissing Notice of Motion No. 2455/2000 with regard to prayer (a) taken out by the Vessel m.v. 'Sea Success I' and her owners S.S. Shipping Corporation Inc. in...

Crown Maritime Co. (i) Ltd. Vs. Barge Salina Ii and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Admiralty Courts Act, 1840 - Sections 6; Admiralty Courts Act, 1861 - Sections 5, 6 and 7; Colonial Courts of Admiralty Act, 1890; Administration of Justice Act, 1920; Judicature Act, 1873; Supreme Court Act, 1981

Reported in : 2008(1)BomCR143

Advocate for Respondent : Rahul Narichania and ;Manoj Khatri, Advs., i/b., Santosh Shetty, Adv.

Dharmadhikari S.C., J.1. The defendants have filed this notice of motion seeking the following reliefs:(a) That the order dated 3rd September, 2007 be vacated and/or set aside;(b) The plaintiff be directed to deposit in this Hon'ble...

M/s. Kassiopi Maritime Co. Ltd. and Another Vs. M.T.AL Layyah and Anot ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Arbitration

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Ramabhadran

P.C. : 1. By an exparte order dated 11.9.2012 this Court ordered arrest of the 1st defendant-vessel. Thereafter by an order dated 9.11.2012 this court ordered release of the 1st defendant-vessel at which time the court...

Noble Resources Ltd. Vs. Twenty First Century Wire Roads Ltd.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Arbitration

1. By this petition filed under Sections 44 to 49 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short the said âArbitration Actâ?), the petitioner seeks a declaration that the arbitral award dated 21st November 2011...

Essar House Private Limited Vs. Arcellor Mittal Nippon Steel India Lim ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.OF2022(Arising out of SLP (C) No.3187 of 2021) ESSAR HOUSE PRIVATE LIMITED ... Appellant versus ARCELLOR MITTAL NIPPON STEEL INDIA LIMITED ... Respondent WITH...

Bharat Singh Vs. M.V. Kamal XLVI and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

P.C. 1. These are a group of suits in which the plaintiffs are crew members who worked onboard different vessels mentioned in each suit. The vessel on which the plaintiffs worked as crew are shown as...

Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. and anr. Vs. Shipping Corporation ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Merchant Shipping Act, 1958 - Sections 352A, 352B(1), 352C, 352C(3), 352C(4) and 358C

Reported in : 2007(4)ALLMR92; 2007(6)BomCR395; 2007(3)MhLj100

Advocate for Respondent : Rahul Narichania, Adv. and ;Kunal Shah, Adv., i/b., ;Bhatt and Saldanha, Advs.

ORDERS.A. Bobde, J.1. This is the defendants' Notice of Motion. The defendants seek a stay of this Suit No. 1512 of 2001 filed by the Oil and Natural Gas Corporation and the New India Assurance company...