Advanced Search Results

Union of India (Uoi) Vs. Mansingka Industries Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Excise

Acts : Indian Companies Act; Central Excises Act, 1944 - Sections 2, 2(4), 3, 4, 35, 36 and 40; Vegetable Oil Control Order, 1947; Essential Commodities Act, 1955; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 9; Finance Act of 1969; Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rule 173C

Reported in : 1979(4)ELT158(Bom)

Mukhi, J.1. This is an appeal by the Union of India in the Department of Central Excise against a decree passed by the learned Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, Jalgaon, in favour of the respondents Mansingka...

Sohanlal Pahladrai Vaid Vs. State

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Commissions of Inquiry Act, 1952 - Sections 6; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 145

Reported in : AIR1965Bom1; (1964)66BOMLR353; 1965CriLJ10; ILR1964Bom679

Advocate for Respondent : J.T. Chada, Adv. and ;M.A. Rane, Asst. Goveronment Pleader

ORDER(1) This is a revision application by the accused against the order passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, F.C., Jalgaon, which is confirmed by the learned Sessions Judge, Jalgaon, rejecting their prayer for a summons for...

Balkishan A. Devidayal Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 8(1), 9(3), 9(4), 14, 160, 161, 193 and 228; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 2, 3, 4, 4(2), 5, 6, 7, 8, 8(1), 9, 9(3), 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 18, 19, 19B, 21, 22, 23, 25, 77, 78(3), 154, 155(2), 156, 160, 162, 162(1), 173, 173(1), 173(4), 190, 190(1) and 251-A; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 132 and 133; Evidence Act - Sections 3, 8, 8(1), 8(2), 9, 9(3), 9(4), 21, 24, 25, 26, 27, 32, 77(2), 78(3), 145, 162, 162(1) and 165

Reported in : AIR1981SC379; (1980)82BOMLR471; 1980CriLJ1424; (1980)4SCC600; [1981]1SCR175

Advocate for Respondent : J.L. Nain and ; M.N. Shroff, Advs.

Sarkaria, J.1. These appeals by special leave directed against Judgments, dated January 17, 1974 and March 29, 1974, of the Bombay High Court, raise, among others, three important questions, namely :(1) Whether an Officer of the...

Ganeshilal Ramkumar and anr. Vs. Jhangiram Lillaram

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC),1908- Order 5, Rule 21-A - Order 30, Rules 3 and 5 - Order 81, Rule 3(3)

Reported in : AIR1974Bom101; (1973)75BOMLR760; ILR1974Bom1105; 1974MhLJ370

Advocate for Respondent : Keshavdas Dalpatrai, Adv.

1. This is an appeal from an order of Principal Judge Rege of the Bombay City Civil Court (as he then was) dated 28th February 1972 dismissing the first defendant's motion for setting aside an ex...

K.M.A. Ltd. Vs. K.S. Thailambal

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Company

Reported in : (1986)88BOMLR89

M.H. Kania, J.1. This appeal raises an interesting question regarding adjustments permitted in winding up in respect of dividends under the provisions of the Companies Act, 1956.2. The respondent No. 3, the Official Liquidator of Kamani...

State of Punjab Vs. Ramesh Kumar

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1984CriLJ381

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Aiai Mittal

S.S. Dewan, J.1. This appeal preferred by the State of Punjab against the acquittal of respondent Ramesh Kumar on a charge under Section 16(1)(a)(i) of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954. is concluded in favour...

Vishnu Shiv Ram Bhoir and ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : AIR1979SC1943; 1979CriLJ1305; (1979)3SCC365; 1979(11)LC869(SC)

S. Murtaza Fazal Ali, J.1. Fourteen persons were charged under Sections 147, 148, 302/149, 395 and 396 of Indian Penal Code and tried by the 3rd Additional Sessions Judge, Thana who acquitted all the accused persons...

Suryakant Natvarlal Surati and Others Vs. Kamani Bros. P. Ltd. and Oth ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 125, 125(1) and 125(4)

Reported in : [1985]58CompCas121(Bom)

Sujatha V. Manohar, J.1. The plaintiffs, who are the trustees of Kamani Engineering Corporation Limited Employees' Gratuity Fund, had filed Suit No. 308 of 1977 in this court against the defendant company for realisation of amounts...

Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay Vs. Ramadevi Shri Nivas Ruja a ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Property

Acts : Land Acquistion Act, 1894 - Sections 3 and 30; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 40

Reported in : AIR1982Bom391; (1982)84BOMLR399; 1982MhLJ377

Advocate for Respondent : P.L. Nain, Adv., ;i/b., Doru & Doru Co.,;B.E. Patel and;S.P. Kanuga, Advs.

Chandurkar, J.1. This is an appeal by the municipal corporation of Greater Bombay challenging the decision of a learned single judge of this court holding that respondent No.1 was entitled to apportionment of amount of compensation...

Mrs. Maya Bhagwandas Advani Vs. Bhagwandas Tarachand Advani

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Trusts and Societies

Reported in : (1979)81BOMLR126; 1978MhLJ449

Chandurkar, J.1. This petition arises out of a dispute raised by opponent No. 1, who is the husband of the petitioner, in respect of five shares which admittedly stand in the name of the petitioner but...