Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: mr mukul rohtagi · Page 1 of about 340 results (0.123 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Aug 19 2011

Shagun Mahila Udyogik Sahakari Sanstha Maryadit Vs. State of Maharasht ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-19-2011

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Maharashtra Co operative Societies Act, 1960.; Constitution of India - Article 32; Public Trust Act, 1950,; Societies Registration Act, 1860,; Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, ; Company registered under the Companies Act, 1956. ; Prevention of Food Adulteration Act ; Food Adulteration Prohibition Act, 1954.

1. Leave granted. 2. The instant appeal is directed against the final judgment and order of the High Court of judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench at Nagpur dated 9th September, 2010, in Writ Petition No. 4210...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 25 2000

T.T. Limited Vs. the Industrial Finance Copn. of India Limited

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-25-2000

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2000VIIAD(Delhi)146

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Mukul Rohtagi, Senior Advocate, ; Mr. Sumant Batra and ;

ORDERK. Ramamoorthy, J.1. The writ petitioner had taken financial assistance from the respondent on various heads. Feeling that the rates of interest charged by the respondent being on the high side, the petitioner wanted to have...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 25 1999

Sunil Kumar Vs. Union of India

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-25-1999

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 1999IVAD(Delhi)506; 80(1999)DLT170; 1999(50)DRJ263; (2000)ILLJ332Del

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Mukul Rohtagi, Senior Adovcate and ; Mr. S.S. Mann, Adv.

ORDERK. Ramamoorthy, J.1. The facts necessary for the appreciation of the questions raised by the petitioners could be narrated in the following terms:The petitioners, who are 24 in number in CW.585/88 and 7 in number in...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jun 01 2001

M/S Niko Resources Ltd. Vs. Union of India

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jun-01-2001

Subject : CommercialArbitration

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 9, 11, 16 and 16 (5); Production and Sharing Contract - Schedule - Articles 1.20 and 31; Joint Operating Agreement - Schedule - Articles 3.1 and 13; Indian Arbitration Act, 1940; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2

Reported in : 93(2001)DLT12

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Mukul Rohtagi, Sr. Adv., Additional Solicitor General, ; Mr. B. Sen, Sr. Adv., ;

ORDERSanjay Kishan Kaul, J.1. These appeals arise from a common order passed by the learned Single Judge on 8th March, 2001 dismissing the applications of the appellants filed under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 12 1999

S.C. Dubey Vs. Union of India

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jul-12-1999

Subject : Labour and IndustrialConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 86(2000)DLT523

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Mukul Rohtagi, Senior Advocate and ; Mr.V. Shekhar, Adv.

ORDERK. Ramamoorthy, J. 1. The second respondent is a public sector undertaking engaged in the manufacture of electronic instruments and manufacture of colour TVs and engaged in other activities with reference to electronics. The Headquarters of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 01 2001

Parshadi and Others Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Aug-01-2001

Subject : Property

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 3, 4, 6, 9, 10, 11, 48, 48(1) and (2); Delhi Development Act - Sections 22, 22(1), 16; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 15, 31(1), 77, 77(2), 77(3), 133, 162, 166, 166(1), 166(2), 166(3), 226, 227, 300-A, 356 and 356(1); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 51, 96, 98 and 165; Government of India (Allocation of Business) Rules, 1961; General Clauses Act - Sections 21; Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 - Sections 2; Transfer of Property Act - Sections 52; Delhi Land Revenue Rules - Rule 110, 110(4); Punjab Land Revenue Act, 1887; Delhi Development Authority (Disposal of Developed Nazul Land) Rules, 1981

Reported in : 93(2001)DLT436

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Harish Salve, Solicitor General, ; Mr. Mukul Rohtagi, Additional Solicitor General, ;

ORDERVijender Jain, J.1. Rule.2. Initially the petitioners have filed this writ petition seeking a direction to the respondents to decide the representations of the petitioners dated 4.11.1996. 6.12.1996 and 24.1.1997 for releasing from acquisition the lands...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 10 2001

Shipping Corpn of India Ltd. Etc. Etc. Vs. C.L. JaIn Woolen Mills and ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-10-2001

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 2(43), 8, 30, 33, 34, 45, 47, 49, 57, 58, 62, 63, 67, 68, 111 and 112; Major Ports Trust Act; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 170 and 171; Indian Bills of Lading Act, 1956

Reported in : AIR2001SC1806; 2001(75)ECC225; 2001(129)ELT561(SC); JT2001(4)SC507; (2001)3MLJ51(SC); 2001(3)SCALE279; (2001)5SCC345; [2001]2SCR1080

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Mukul Rohtagi, ; ASG, ; Mr. B. Datta, Sr. Adv., ;

Pattanaik, J. 1. Leave Granted. 2. In this batch of appeals, a common question of law having arisen, they were heard together and are being disposed of by this common judgment. The question for consideration is...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 04 2004

Kartongen Kemi Och Forvaltning Ab and ors. Vs. State Through Cbi

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-04-2004

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 227 and 228; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 120B, 161, 420 and 465; Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 - Sections 5(1) and 5(2); Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 63 and 78(6)

Reported in : 2004(72)DRJ693

Advocate for Respondent : Mukul Rohtagi, Addl. Solicitor General, ; Navin Chawla, ; N

J.D. Kapoor, J.1. The petitioners, M/s A.B. Bofors, S.P. Hinduja, G.P. Hinduja and P.P. Hinduja, have through these petitions challenged the impugned order dated 14.11.2002 passed by the learned Special Judge whereby he has charged them...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 18 2001

C.J. International Hotels Ltd. and ors. Vs. N.D.M.C. and Others

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-18-2001

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 20; Punjab Municipal Act, 1911; Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971 ; Army Act, 1950; Army Rules - Rules 66 and 66(1); Constitution of India - Articles 21, 136, 166 and 227; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 35; Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 - Sections 14-A;

Reported in : 2001(60)DRJ562

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Mukul Rohtagi, Addl. Solicitor General and ; Mr. Arvind Shah, Adv.

ORDERS.K. Mahajan. J.1. Plaintiff No. 1 is the owner of a five stat hotel being run under the name and style of Hotel Le Meridian. The hotel is constructed on a plot of land bearing No....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 11 1998

Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi and ors. Vs. Dr. Ran ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-11-1998

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : [1999]238ITR268(Delhi)

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Ravinder Sethi and ; Mr. Mukul Rohtagi, Sr. Advs., and ;

ORDERManmohan Sarin, J.1. The above batch of writ petitions have been preferred by the Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi. The challenge in the writ petitions is to the judgment dated 23.4.1998 of the Central...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial