Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: mr mukul rohatgi · Page 1 of about 307 results (0.165 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jan 03 2001

Delhi Bar Association Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jan-03-2001

Subject : Service

Reported in : 2000(6)SCALE41; (2002)10SCC159

B.N. Kirpal,; D.P. Mohapatra and; R.P. Sethi, JJ.1. Mr Mukul Rohatgi, learned Additional Solicitor-General, brings to our notice that there is an order of stay passed by this Court which is hindering the recruitment of the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 11 2012

Ms Patel Enginnering Ltd. Vs. Union of India and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : May-11-2012

Subject : Commercial

Acts : National Highways Authority Act - Section 3 (1) (2) (4); Constitution Of India - Article 298; Capital of Punjab (Development and Regulation) Act, 1952

Chelameswar, J.1. The National Highways Authority of India (R-2) had decided to undertake development and operation / maintenance of “six laning of Dhankuni - Kharagpur Section of NH-6” in the States of West Bengal and Orissa...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 28 1992

Sarla Luthra Vs. Gadore Tools (India) Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-28-1992

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 - Sections 14D

Reported in : 49(1993)DLT44; 1993(25)DRJ52; 1993RLR22

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Mukul Rohatgi

Santosh Duggal, J.(1) The question falling for determination in this revision petition filed under section 25-B(8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (for short the Act. falls in a very narrow campass. (2) The petitioner...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Feb 16 2008

Bajaj Auto Ltd., State of Maharashtra Rep. by S. Ravikumar Vs. Tvs Mot ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Feb-16-2008

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Patents Act, 1970 - Sections 2, 10, 11, 11(2), 11(3), 11B(1), 11B(3), 12, 12(1), 13, 13(1), 13(4), 25, 26(1), 43, 47, 48, 53(1), 64, 104A, 105, 106 and 108; Patents (Amendment) Act, 2002 - Sections 48; Patents (Amendment) Act, 2005; Motor Vehicles Act; Patents Act, 1949; Patents and Designs Act, 1911 - Sections 12; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2; Designs Act, 1911 - Sections 2(8), 26(1), 51 and 53

Reported in : (2008)ILLJ726Mad; LC2008(1)217; 2008(36)PTC417(Mad)

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Mukul Rohatgi

P. Jyothimani, J.1. The plaintiff in C.S. No. 979 of 2007 is the defendant in C.S. No. 1111 of 2007.2. C.S. No. 1111 of 2007 is a suit filed under Section 108 of the Patents Act,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 01 1992

Ram Sarup Vs. Brahma Devi and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-01-1992

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 - Sections 39

Reported in : 1992(23)DRJ242

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Mukul Rohatgi, Mr. Rehatgi

P.N. Nag, J.(1) This Second Appeal under Section 39 of the Delhi Rent Control Act (hereinafter called the Act) has arisen out of an order dated 15.2.1991 passed by Shri O.P. Dwivedi, Rent Control Tribunal whereby...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 13 2019

M/S Golden Tobacco Limited and Anr. Vs.itc Limited and Anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-13-2019

Subject : MRTP

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Mukul Rohatgi, Mr. Rajiv Nayar, Mr. Mahesh Agarwal, Mr. Rishi Agarwal, Mr. Karan Luthra, Ms. Aarushi Tiku

$~2 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:13. h September, 2019 W.P.(C) 9490/2019 and CM APPL. 39051/2019 M/S GOLDEN TOBACCO LIMITED AND ANR. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Raj Bahadur...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 09 1996

Shruti Enterprises Vs. Daya Nand

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-09-1996

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 151; Registration Act, 1908 - Sections 17(1)

Reported in : 1996IIAD(Delhi)661; 63(1996)DLT68; 1996(38)DRJ168; 1996RLR267

J.K. Mehra, J.(1) This is a revision petition filed by the. tenant M/s Shruti Enterprises against the order of first appellate Court of Shri Raghuvir Singh, Senior Civil Judge. In brief, the case of the petitioner...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 16 2015

Supreme Court Advocates-On-Record Association and Anr. Vs. Union of In ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-16-2015

Subject : MRTP

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.13 OF2015Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record - Association and another … Petitioner(s) versus Union of India … Respondent(s) With |WRIT PETITION (C) No.14 OF2015| |WRIT...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 24 2022

Zakia Ahsan Jafri Vs. The State Of Gujarat

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jun-24-2022

Subject : Land Acquisition

1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL No.………./2022 (arising out of SLP(Crl.) No.………./2022 @ Diary No.34207/2018) ZAKIA AHSAN JAFRI …. APPELLANT versus STATE OF GUJARAT & ANR. …. RESPONDENTS JUDGMENT1...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 14 2021

Madras Bar Association Vs. Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jul-14-2021

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Writ Petition (Civil) No.502 of 2021 Madras Bar Association .... Petitioner(s) Versus Union of India & Another …. Respondent (s) JUDGMENT L. NAGESWARA RAO, J.1. The...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial