Advanced Search Results

Employers in Relation to Manoharbahal Colliery, Calcutta Vs. K.N. Mish ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code Of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 23 Rule 3

Reported in : AIR1975SC1632; 1975LabIC1082; (1975)2SCC244; 1975(7)LC252(SC)

A. ALAGIRISWAMI, J.1. This is an application by the first respondent in the appeal to set aside the compromise decree dated February 7, 1972. The Memorandum of Compromise on the basis of which the appeal was...

Asaddar Ali Khan Waqf Estate by Mutwali Gajanfor Ali Khan and anr. Vs. ...

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Property

Reported in : AIR1944Cal57

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Mukherjee

Pal, J.1. This appeal is by the plaintiffs in a suit for the recovery of possession of the disputed lands on a declaration that the same appertain to taluk No. 1079/7 Bakar Mahmud. The taluk No....

Rukmani Debi Kashuka Vs. Jadu Nath Misra and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1974CriLJ1139

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Mukherjee

ORDERAnil Kumar Sen, J.1. This rule was issued on a writ petition. The petitioner is a woman who being served with a requisition dated June 4. 1970 by respondent No. 1 an Investigating Officer belonging to...

Collector of C. Ex. Vs. Incab Industries

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Subject : Excise

Reported in : (1990)(45)ELT342TriDel

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Mukherjee

1. These 103 appeals are disposed of by a common order as the issue involved is common.2. Appeals No. 1600 to 1606/89-A, arise out of an order-in-appeal No.2/Pat./89, dated 9-1-1989 of the Collector approving 7 price...

Samir Mandal Vs. State of Bihar and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code Of Criminal Procedure (Cr.P.C), 1973 - Section 125; Inidan Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Section 494

Reported in : II(2006)DMC599; (2001)10SCC50

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Mukherjee

G.B. Pattanaik,; U.C. Banerjee and; S.N. Variava, JJ.1. Leave granted.2. The only question that arises for consideration in this appeal is whether the respondent alleging to be the wife of the appellant was entitled to claim...

Union of India (Uoi) and ors. Vs. Pradeep Kumar Saxena

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Acts : Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 - Section 21

Reported in : 1995Supp(4)SCC69

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Mukherjee

J.S. Verma and; S.P. Bharucha, JJ.1. Leave granted. Heard.2. The respondent Pradeep Kumar Saxena was engaged as a Typist on daily wages on 5-8-1987 in the North Eastern Railway at Lucknow and was discontinued on 11-3-1988....

M/S. Kachhi Properties, Satara, a Partnership Firm, Through Partner an ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Acts : Indian Registration Act, 1908 - Section 18 , ; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Section 52, Order 39, Rules 1 and 2 ; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908

Reported in : AIR2011(NOC)185(Bom)

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Mukherjee

1. A common question about the necessity of granting a temporary injunction to restrain a defendant from creating third party interests/alienating the property pending suit, in the face of provisions of Section 52 of the Transfer...

R. Khemka and Another Vs. Deccan Enterprises Pvt. Ltd., Secunderabad a ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 165, 210, 397, 398, 402 and 437; Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 34

Reported in : 1999(1)ALD558; 1999(1)ALT628; [2000]100CompCas211(AP)

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Mukherjee for Y. Ratnakar, ;Mr. P. Chatterjee for Mohmood Ali, ;Mr. S.A. Kapoor for Ravi S., Advs.

ORDERUmesh Chandra Banerjee, CJ .1. Statutory protection against 'oppression' in corporate management as provided under Sections 397 and 398 of the Companies Act cannot but be ascribed to be discretionary in nature and the law Courts...

State of Punjab Vs. Balraj Singh Alias Chhajju

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 302 and 307

Reported in : AIR1978SC1136; 1978CriLJ1092; (1978)3SCC129; 1978(10)LC248(SC)

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Mukherjee

S. Murtaza Fazal Ali, J. 1. This appeal by special leave is directed against the judgment of the Punjab and Haryana High Court dated 10.9.1974 by which the appellant Balraj Singh @ Chhajju has been acquitted...

Purnia Vs. State of Orissa

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : AIR1979SC1454; 48(1979)CLT533(SC); (1979)3SCC393; 1979(11)LC426(SC)

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Mukherjee

S. Murtaza Fazal Ali, J.1. In this appeal under the Supreme Court (Enlargement of Crl. Appellate Jurisdiction) Act, the appellant has been convicted under Section 302 IPC and sentenced to imprisonment for life. The appellant was...