Advanced Search Results

Kanshi Nath Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 - Sections 2, 7, 13(2), 13(3), 13(5) and 16; Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955 - Rule 53

Reported in : 124(2005)DLT413; 2005(84)DRJ506

Advocate for Respondent : Sunil Sharma, Adv.

Badar Durrez Ahmed, J.1. This revision petition is directed against the judgment and/or order dated 17.04.2003 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge whereby the petitioner's appeal against the judgment dated 29.10.1990 and order on sentence...

Varaha Infra - Jceg (Jv) vs.national Highway Authority of India and An ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Mittal

$~7 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Judgment:14. h August, 2019 + W.P.(C) 8312/2019 VARAHA INFRA - JCEG (JV) ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Senior Advocate with Ms....

Gram Panchayat, Murthal Vs. the Land Acquisition Collector

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Limitation

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 18, 18(1) and 18(2); Indian Limitation Act, 1908 - Sections 3, 4 to 24, 29 and 29(2) - Schedule - Article 182; Uttar Pradesh Sales Act, 1948 - Sections 2(1) and 10(3); Uttar Pradesh Tenancy Act, 1939; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 12; Income-tax Act - Sections 66(2) and 66(3); Orissa Agricultural Income-tax Act

Reported in : AIR1972P& H36

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Mittal

Prem Chand Jain, J.1. The question that has been referred by my Lord, the Chief Justice, for our decision is in the following terms :--'Is an applicant entitled to exclude the period taken in obtaining a...

Karnail Singh and ors. Vs. Kapur Singh and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 2(2) and 97; Court-fee Act

Reported in : AIR1980P& H202

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. A. N. Mittal, Mr. Mittal

Prem Chand Jain, J.1. Reference dated 28-9-1979 by Prem Chand Jain and D. S. Tewatia, JJ.) The question that falls for determination in this appeal may be stated thus:--'What court-fee would be payable on the memorandum...

Chhotey Etc. Vs. Mohammad YasIn Etc

Court : Delhi

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 - Sections 25; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 21, Rule 97

Reported in : 1977RLR484

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Mittal

Rajindar Sachar, J. (1) The appellant objector filed an appeal before the Rent Control Tribunal and asked for interim stay which was refused vide order dated 3-8-1976. Thereafter the objector filed an appeal to this Court...

Master Manoj Vs. Sh. Bhuvnesh Gupta @ Bhanu and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Mittal

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment pronounced on: April 16, 2014 + CS(OS) 113/2008 & I.A. No.5445/2010 MASTER MANOJ Through ..... Plaintiff Mr.J.S.Bakshi, Adv. with Ms.Sunita Tiwari, Adv. versus SH....

Samir Jasuja Vs. M/S Assotech Realty Private Ltd. and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Mittal, Mr. Chawla

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Order reserved on:03. 10.2013 % + Order delivered on:21. 10.2013 CS(OS) 2229/2009 SAMIR JASUJA Through: ..... Plaintiff Mr. Siddharth Yadav and Mr. Wasim Ashraf, Advocates versus...

Sh. Gautam JaIn and anr. Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Essential Commodities Act, 1955 - Sections 3 and 7; Essential Commodities (Special Provisions) Act, 1981 - Sections 12A; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 120B, 420, 468 and 471; Newsprint Control Order, 1962; defense of India Rules, 1962 - Rule 132A; defense of India (Amendment) Rules, 1965

Reported in : 129(2006)DLT477

Advocate for Respondent : R.M. Tiwari, Adv.

Badar Durrez Ahmed, J.1. These 8 revision petitions raise common issues, although there are separate orders which are impugned in these petitions. Some of the accused are also common in these petitions. The broad facts are...

Shafiq Ahmad Vs. District Magistrate, Meerut and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 87 and 88; Constitution of India - Article 32

Reported in : 1990AIHC220; 1990CriLJ573; 1989(3)Crimes278(SC); JT1989(3)SC659; 1989(2)SCALE565; (1989)4SCC556; [1989]Supp1SCR56; AIR 1990 SC 220

Advocate for Respondent : Anil Dev Singh, ; Yogeshwar Prasad, ; Kitty Kumar Mangalam,

Sabyasachi Mukharji, J.1. This petition under Article 32 of the Constitution challenges the detention of the petitioner-a detenu, under Section 3(2) of the National Security Act, 1980 (hereinafter called 'the Act'). The petitioner is a bachelor....

Union of India Vs. Kewal Krishan Mittal

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 151; Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 34; Constitution of India - Article 311; Bar Council of India Rules - Rule 51; Fundamental Rules - Rule 54(3)

Reported in : AIR1984Delhi38; 25(1984)DLT24; 1984RLR20

Avadh Behari, J.(1) The single question in these proceedings is whether this court can issue a direction to the Union of India for the payment of arrears of salary to the Government servant after the dismissal...